October 4th, 2002 -- by Bacchus
Because Then She Won’t USE It
Anil Dash has been thinking in the shower again, and thinking like a man at that:
“Why don’t they just drop the facade and make a dildo-shaped attachment for those hand-held shower nozzles? I mean, we’re all kind of in a wink-wink understanding that those things exist solely for women’s masturbatory needs, right? Well, I say any job worth doing is worth doing right. And that means getting the right tools for the job.”
Similar Sex Blogging:
This entry was posted on Friday, October 4th, 2002 at 5:54 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=46
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=46
I’m a guy and I have one. It makes all showering activities easier, especially if your shower head does not have enough water pressure; you can move the head right into the area (armpit, chest, etc) to make sure it rinses all the soap off. It’s like most other household objects; just because you COULD masturbate with it doesn’t mean you have to.
I think they SHOULD make dildo attachments. It would be awesome.
If you really want to fully enjoy your massager, be sure to purchase a model with a hand-held head and a long flexible cord.
I always thought that it was interesting that soon after feminist writers reported that you could use a popular home-duty pulsating oral hygiene machine on your clitoris (with successful results that many women weren’t receiving from their husbands), the company that manufactured the apparatus came out with the shower massage. The short entirely sanitized admittance of their origination is found here:
http://www.wate...sage/
Originally many oral units were inconveniently permanently wall-mounted (next to the sink), by clueless husbands. They also invented both “traveling” and cordless versions of their original hydro-flosser, so that one could take the machine with you “when on vacation”.
Surely the desire women had for a unit that they could use while lying back in the tub (thereby neatly catching all of the “spent” water), had nothing to do with this version…
http://www.wate...-300/
Note: They now boast of “quiet operation”, and now you can dial back (or up!), the intensity of the pulsation pressure to suit the tenderness of your, um, gums, and they even have a variety of four different types of “tips”, including one for your, er, tongue…
…and here we have an even more compact version:
http://www.wate...sser/
[…] has been paying attention to Anil Dash for a very long time. Indeed, the second ErosBlog post ever quoted his musings on the masturbatory uses of hand-held shower nozzles. So I’ve been mulling his Stop […]
As I poke through your archives whilst crafting my History post, I read this and thought “well that person was clearly ahead of their time” since now that sort of thing does exist.
I mean not that they did it WELL. But they did it. There’s the Aqueous Vibe which threatens to take an eye out during use. And something that I don’t think is out yet called “WowerShower”.
Then again…..women don’t use the shower head for vaginal stimulation, it’s all about the clitoris!
Anil was and is a smart guy, but I don’t think he had given any careful thought to the clitoral/vaginal distinction. 2002 was really another country and another culture when viewed from now!