Comments on: Procreative Chastity, Anal Freedom

By: wench

wench — Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:38:09 +0000

I’ve heard, though I could be wrong, that often women had anal sex to preserve their virginity for marriage, and though I can’t remember how far back it was said to happen, I’m thinking at least the 15 or 16th century. Again, I could be wrong.

By: Danielle

Danielle — Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:28:28 +0000

I thought, for some reason, that the sin of Sodom & Gomorroh was non-procreational sex, which might even include using contraceptives. Not sure where I got that idea though. :)

By: cee

cee — Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:49:11 +0000

“this is very new in the postmodern sense”
i have a postmodern ass? Who knew?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:44:45 +0000

“How on earth they procreated”.
now we’re talking. The procreation need was always there. Look around now. Is it true?
The Butt sex craze between the genders, is only starting, and follows a pattern of increased sexual liberation.
First you got the hand job action, then came the blow job action, now women are showing sphincter and want the AJ action. Believe me, this is very new in the postmodern sense.
It was only a few years ago the Female cultural leaders were crying for ever larger cock. Now I don’t hear them. Is it because of a backlash? (sorry, pun intended)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:09:22 +0000

In modern theology the “Sin of Sodom” is as likely to be inhospitability as yer actual buggery — and the historical theology is that it was homosexual intercourse. Lot was the one good man in the city, which is why he was allowed to flee. The “pillar of salt” episode sounds so much like Orpheus and Eurydice fleeing hell (he looks back to check she’s following her, and *pfft* she’s gone) to be accidental.
The ancient Greeks, by the way, preferred inter-crural shagging (between the thighs) for their hot man-on-man action and went back to their wives only to procreate.
Was I the only person to read “Butt sex between the sexes is a relatively modern phenomena” as “But sex between…” and wonder how on earth they procreated?

By: creature

creature — Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:46:08 +0000

That bible story is interesting. Sorry, it got lumped into the Roman era. Wonder if what happened to that city portends something for the lot of us.

By: Justin

Justin — Sun, 08 Feb 2004 19:32:00 +0000

I’ve been reading a book called “Jewel in the Lotus” about Oriental/Arabic/Indian sexual habits in the 19th century and earlier. While the Europeans of that time might have fainted at the thought of anal sex, many other cultures enjoyed Every form of intercourse. Every, Every, Every. Just because a certain culture does not practice a sexual act at a certain time does not mean their ancestors were so inclined.