Comments on: 15 Year Old Girl Criminally Charged For Self Abuse http://www.erosblog.com/2004/03/31/15-year-old-girl-criminally-charged-for-self-abuse/ Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jack http://www.erosblog.com/2004/03/31/15-year-old-girl-criminally-charged-for-self-abuse/#comment-107324 Jack Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:22:32 +0000 http://www.erosblog.com/wp/?p=770#comment-107324 God help America with our legal system and god-or-should-i-say-religion-sponsored human stupidity. God help our world, if we cannot see beyond our noses. Why not sentence to death every suicide-attempter that did not succeed in killing him/herself then. Come on folks, wtf is going on with us, people!?! God help America with our legal system and god-or-should-i-say-religion-sponsored human stupidity. God help our world, if we cannot see beyond our noses.

Why not sentence to death every suicide-attempter that did not succeed in killing him/herself then.

Come on folks, wtf is going on with us, people!?!

]]> By: sudsyjoe http://www.erosblog.com/2004/03/31/15-year-old-girl-criminally-charged-for-self-abuse/#comment-64691 sudsyjoe Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:53:45 +0000 http://www.erosblog.com/wp/?p=770#comment-64691 Did this girl charge money to see her pictures? that is the only reason I can see to charge her with anything. I hope these cops know that they have ruined this girl's life. She is now marked as a child molester, and not many people take into consideration the facts of the charge against her they just see a baby raper LOL. I feel that the legal system has caused her more damage that she could ever cause! Did this girl charge money to see her pictures? that is the only reason I can see to charge her with anything. I hope these cops know that they have ruined this girl’s life. She is now marked as a child molester, and not many people take into consideration the facts of the charge against her they just see a baby raper LOL. I feel that the legal system has caused her more damage that she could ever cause!

]]> By: Dr.Whiplash http://www.erosblog.com/2004/03/31/15-year-old-girl-criminally-charged-for-self-abuse/#comment-21409 Dr.Whiplash Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:33:25 +0000 http://www.erosblog.com/wp/?p=770#comment-21409 I would LOVE to know the current disposition of this case. Bacchus is right in comment #6. Ostensibly, the girl can't be used in porn because she's supposedly below the age of consent (18 in California, 14 in Hawaii, 16 in Connecticut...), or age at which she is competent to make decisions regarding her body. This generally refers to sexual acts with others, And the above posting mentions no partners. In many states, only male on female intercourse is forbidden. If the act cannot result in sexual reproduction, then the action isn't forbidden. The general rule of thumb regarding photography is that if it isn't illegal to DO it, it's not illegal to photograph it. Hence, if 12-year-old Brooke Shields can be naked in front of her doctor, the she should be able to be naked in front of the director of "Pretty Baby", and twelve-year-olds should be able to pose for Sally Mann's photographs. If she's too young to competently give consent, then she's too young to be competently responsible as well, therefore if she's old enough to be competently responsible for what she did, then she's old enough to consent to it. Besides, maybe she showed herself a false I.D... I would LOVE to know the current disposition of this case. Bacchus is right in comment #6. Ostensibly, the girl can’t be used in porn because she’s supposedly below the age of consent (18 in California, 14 in Hawaii, 16 in Connecticut…), or age at which she is competent to make decisions regarding her body. This generally refers to sexual acts with others, And the above posting mentions no partners. In many states, only male on female intercourse is forbidden. If the act cannot result in sexual reproduction, then the action isn’t forbidden. The general rule of thumb regarding photography is that if it isn’t illegal to DO it, it’s not illegal to photograph it. Hence, if 12-year-old Brooke Shields can be naked in front of her doctor, the she should be able to be naked in front of the director of “Pretty Baby”, and twelve-year-olds should be able to pose for Sally Mann’s photographs. If she’s too young to competently give consent, then she’s too young to be competently responsible as well, therefore if she’s old enough to be competently responsible for what she did, then she’s old enough to consent to it. Besides, maybe she showed herself a false I.D…

]]> By: Shane http://www.erosblog.com/2004/03/31/15-year-old-girl-criminally-charged-for-self-abuse/#comment-803 Shane Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:16:54 +0000 http://www.erosblog.com/wp/?p=770#comment-803 I can't agree with distorting the law because the current statutes seem inadequate. What's wrong with the dissemination charge? I can’t agree with distorting the law because the current statutes seem inadequate.
What’s wrong with the dissemination charge?

]]> By: holly http://www.erosblog.com/2004/03/31/15-year-old-girl-criminally-charged-for-self-abuse/#comment-800 holly Mon, 05 Apr 2004 01:31:48 +0000 http://www.erosblog.com/wp/?p=770#comment-800 Chances are IF someone saved her (the 15 yr old) pics on their hard drive and IF they got caught, they would have other pictures there as well, not just hers however, If anyone recalls seeing Brooke Shields in "Pretty Baby" or has viewed any one of a number of models these days that are below 18, it's very hard to tell, who is of age and who isn't. The police dept, in my opinion, should have used better judgement. Arresting her, charging her with Child porn etc., isn't going to 'cure' what is right or wrong in this picture. Where were her parents and why didn't they KNOW what their daughter was doing?? Why haven't they had a dialogue with her regarding the dangers of the internet?? The police, in my opinion, should have arrested the parents if anyone, for not paying attention to their daughter. Until she's 18, they are responsible. I'm a pornographer, but i know where my child surfs, i know what chat rooms he frequents, I know who he talks to, because WE talk about it. This is 2004, not 1904, and with all the media access we have today, there is not reason NOT to have frank and open discussions with children about being body positive, STD, sex, etc. Chances are IF someone saved her (the 15 yr old) pics on their hard drive and IF they got caught, they would have other pictures there as well, not just hers however, If anyone recalls seeing Brooke Shields in “Pretty Baby” or has viewed any one of a number of models these days that are below 18, it’s very hard to tell, who is of age and who isn’t.
The police dept, in my opinion, should have used better judgement. Arresting her, charging her with Child porn etc., isn’t going to ‘cure’ what is right or wrong in this picture.
Where were her parents and why didn’t they KNOW what their daughter was doing?? Why haven’t they had a dialogue with her regarding the dangers of the internet??
The police, in my opinion, should have arrested the parents if anyone, for not paying attention to their daughter. Until she’s 18, they are responsible.
I’m a pornographer, but i know where my child surfs, i know what chat rooms he frequents, I know who he talks to, because WE talk about it.
This is 2004, not 1904, and with all the media access we have today, there is not reason NOT to have frank and open discussions with children about being body positive, STD, sex, etc.

]]> By: Vikki http://www.erosblog.com/2004/03/31/15-year-old-girl-criminally-charged-for-self-abuse/#comment-804 Vikki Sat, 03 Apr 2004 04:34:10 +0000 http://www.erosblog.com/wp/?p=770#comment-804 I just want to know - if she does herself with a dildo, would that put her up on statutory rape charges, as well? Gosh, I'm glad I live in Canada. I just want to know – if she does herself with a dildo, would that put her up on statutory rape charges, as well?
Gosh, I’m glad I live in Canada.

]]> By: Bobo http://www.erosblog.com/2004/03/31/15-year-old-girl-criminally-charged-for-self-abuse/#comment-814 Bobo Fri, 02 Apr 2004 02:14:11 +0000 http://www.erosblog.com/wp/?p=770#comment-814 She should not be charged with the abuse, that is plainly nuts. Where she is liable is distributing those pictures to others. She should not be charged with the abuse, that is plainly nuts. Where she is liable is distributing those pictures to others.

]]>