<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Purely Symbolic Censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 17:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: W. S. Cross</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>W. S. Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>Japanese censorship laws are pretty specific from what I've been told, and they have no choice but to do these kinds of things (blurring the genitals of hardcore is another common result).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japanese censorship laws are pretty specific from what I&#8217;ve been told, and they have no choice but to do these kinds of things (blurring the genitals of hardcore is another common result).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan S.</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3415</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3415</guid>
		<description>Are you sure that line is for "censorship" rather than being, say, a depiction of a toothpick or some similar object that is supposed to actually be there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure that line is for &#8220;censorship&#8221; rather than being, say, a depiction of a toothpick or some similar object that is supposed to actually be there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wegglywoo</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3414</link>
		<dc:creator>wegglywoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3414</guid>
		<description>oh! of course... it's covering the clitoris.

i get it now.

now you say that, the picture finally makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh! of course&#8230; it&#8217;s covering the clitoris.</p>
<p>i get it now.</p>
<p>now you say that, the picture finally makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solo</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3417</link>
		<dc:creator>Solo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3417</guid>
		<description>Yeah, they cant show a womant clit or a man's penis-head ridge, if he has the skin taken off of the snake, that is. :D  after that, pretty much everything else if fair go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, they cant show a womant clit or a man&#8217;s penis-head ridge, if he has the skin taken off of the snake, that is. :D  after that, pretty much everything else if fair go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lana</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3413</link>
		<dc:creator>Lana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3413</guid>
		<description>haha. Right, because putting that white stripe over the clitoris makes it totally non-sexual. Too funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha. Right, because putting that white stripe over the clitoris makes it totally non-sexual. Too funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightfire</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3412</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/06/09/purely-symbolic-censorship/#comment-3412</guid>
		<description>Oh my, that's...wonderful.  I've never really understood that whole censorship in hentai thing, it seems to varry in how much and what is actually censored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, that&#8217;s&#8230;wonderful.  I&#8217;ve never really understood that whole censorship in hentai thing, it seems to varry in how much and what is actually censored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
