<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blowjob As Fine Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 23:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scheck</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Scheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>What I like is the smile of delight and anticipation on her face.  She looks like a woman who loves what she is about to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like is the smile of delight and anticipation on her face.  She looks like a woman who loves what she is about to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>Trinity, in all seriousness, that's the sort of question I try not to ask here on ErosBlog.

It comes up more frequently with regard to womens' breasts.  Trouble is, the "are those real?" conversation trends rapidly toward a sort of body-critical mode of discussion; the sort of folks who'll post "she's an ugly pig" whenever they see a woman not in the final throes of terminal anorexia are also the sort of folks who *love* to post "those boobs are fake" whenever someone else has admired some.  It's like they have a compulsion to shit all over anything that other folks have admired.

(I speculate that this is a species of adolescent male one-upsmanship.  "You think she's pretty?  She's a cow, you dork!")

For some folks (a blessed minority of ErosBlog readers) that's the only kind of discourse about nudity they are comfortable with.  I usually ban their sorry asses, but what I've discovered is that other, more friendly sorts of conversation on the topic (like your question) encourages the garbage-talkers to post.  So I try not to go there.

The other problem with the "is that real?" threads is pointlessness.  Everybody sees the same photo, nobody has better/different information, and so you get a hundred posts going "I think so" / "I don't think so" and at the end of the day, nobody knows anything more than they did at the beginning.  Trouble is, this exercise always turns up a few folks who feel their opinion *must* be correct, even though it's logically impossible for them to have enough information.  And then the pointless arguments start.

Thuse, I prefer to encourage everyone who cares to make a decision ... and then keep it to themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trinity, in all seriousness, that&#8217;s the sort of question I try not to ask here on ErosBlog.</p>
<p>It comes up more frequently with regard to womens&#8217; breasts.  Trouble is, the &#8220;are those real?&#8221; conversation trends rapidly toward a sort of body-critical mode of discussion; the sort of folks who&#8217;ll post &#8220;she&#8217;s an ugly pig&#8221; whenever they see a woman not in the final throes of terminal anorexia are also the sort of folks who *love* to post &#8220;those boobs are fake&#8221; whenever someone else has admired some.  It&#8217;s like they have a compulsion to shit all over anything that other folks have admired.</p>
<p>(I speculate that this is a species of adolescent male one-upsmanship.  &#8220;You think she&#8217;s pretty?  She&#8217;s a cow, you dork!&#8221;)</p>
<p>For some folks (a blessed minority of ErosBlog readers) that&#8217;s the only kind of discourse about nudity they are comfortable with.  I usually ban their sorry asses, but what I&#8217;ve discovered is that other, more friendly sorts of conversation on the topic (like your question) encourages the garbage-talkers to post.  So I try not to go there.</p>
<p>The other problem with the &#8220;is that real?&#8221; threads is pointlessness.  Everybody sees the same photo, nobody has better/different information, and so you get a hundred posts going &#8220;I think so&#8221; / &#8220;I don&#8217;t think so&#8221; and at the end of the day, nobody knows anything more than they did at the beginning.  Trouble is, this exercise always turns up a few folks who feel their opinion *must* be correct, even though it&#8217;s logically impossible for them to have enough information.  And then the pointless arguments start.</p>
<p>Thuse, I prefer to encourage everyone who cares to make a decision &#8230; and then keep it to themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trinity</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2427</link>
		<dc:creator>Trinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2427</guid>
		<description>that is so not a real penis... is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is so not a real penis&#8230; is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2426</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2426</guid>
		<description>Yes as Pussy Talk said she is a very real women, and a very happy one too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes as Pussy Talk said she is a very real women, and a very happy one too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2425</link>
		<dc:creator>The Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 09:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2425</guid>
		<description>What DTG said.

A beautiful picture indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What DTG said.</p>
<p>A beautiful picture indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky Mesmer</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2424</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky Mesmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2424</guid>
		<description>Got to love the vintage porno. Especially when the titties are that freaking nice. 
 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to love the vintage porno. Especially when the titties are that freaking nice.<br />
 :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cha</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Cha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>"Enough with the blowjobs"

  Never enough with the blowjobs bring them on 24/7 Kudos to the Artist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Enough with the blowjobs&#8221;</p>
<p>  Never enough with the blowjobs bring them on 24/7 Kudos to the Artist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pussy Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2423</link>
		<dc:creator>Pussy Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2423</guid>
		<description>How utterly refreshing, to see a real woman with a real womanly body portrayed as an object of desire, instead of some scrawny jailbait clothes hanger with store-bought boobs.  

Thank you!! 

DTG xxoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How utterly refreshing, to see a real woman with a real womanly body portrayed as an object of desire, instead of some scrawny jailbait clothes hanger with store-bought boobs.  </p>
<p>Thank you!! </p>
<p>DTG xxoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolHipster</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2422</link>
		<dc:creator>CoolHipster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2422</guid>
		<description>Women with hips like those are still sexy in 2005!  Don't let people tell you different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women with hips like those are still sexy in 2005!  Don&#8217;t let people tell you different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mumford</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Mumford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/wp/2005/12/04/the-blowjob-as-fine-art/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>Hi. Long-time reader, first time poster. Have you seen the hp ads on TV with the picture frames? An X-rated one would wonderful and the possible variations are endless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Long-time reader, first time poster. Have you seen the hp ads on TV with the picture frames? An X-rated one would wonderful and the possible variations are endless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
