<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Champaign Sex And The Perils of Copy Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2006/07/18/champaign-sex-and-the-perils-of-copy-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/07/18/champaign-sex-and-the-perils-of-copy-protection/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 08:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/07/18/champaign-sex-and-the-perils-of-copy-protection/#comment-76695</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/07/18/champaign-sex-and-the-perils-of-copy-protection/#comment-76695</guid>
		<description>My mind has been stifled!  When I first saw that picture, I thought, "sanitation'!   Kind of a clean up before partaking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mind has been stifled!  When I first saw that picture, I thought, &#8220;sanitation&#8217;!   Kind of a clean up before partaking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael B</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/07/18/champaign-sex-and-the-perils-of-copy-protection/#comment-6406</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/07/18/champaign-sex-and-the-perils-of-copy-protection/#comment-6406</guid>
		<description>When I run across this particular issue when getting images for my blog, I use the very helpful feature in Firefox under tools, called Page Info.  If you call this up and then go to "Media" is shows all the invidual components of the page, including the jpg under the blank gif file.  You can then do a simple "save as".  I still need to resort to screen captures for flash based webpages as this doesn't work for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I run across this particular issue when getting images for my blog, I use the very helpful feature in Firefox under tools, called Page Info.  If you call this up and then go to &#8220;Media&#8221; is shows all the invidual components of the page, including the jpg under the blank gif file.  You can then do a simple &#8220;save as&#8221;.  I still need to resort to screen captures for flash based webpages as this doesn&#8217;t work for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/07/18/champaign-sex-and-the-perils-of-copy-protection/#comment-6397</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/07/18/champaign-sex-and-the-perils-of-copy-protection/#comment-6397</guid>
		<description>Not to burst your rant bubble, but it is also possible that the web designer of that site was trying to save herself the hassle of having her site's bandwidth hijacked by those who would merely &lt;i&gt;link&lt;/i&gt; to the pics in question. My buddy Ryland, of A Boy and His Computer fame, has a similar set-up: if someone tries to link to or save a pic that is on his site, they'll get another image instead that says, "You're trying to steal my bandwidth, and that makes baby Jesus cry."

Of course, if the woman has actually stated on her site that "All images are copyright © 2088 by Her Royal Dumbass," something similar, then she's an idiot.

Something to be said about those old illustrations, though: Makes you wonder what our forefathers knew that we have somehow forgotten, like how to enjoy ourselves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to burst your rant bubble, but it is also possible that the web designer of that site was trying to save herself the hassle of having her site&#8217;s bandwidth hijacked by those who would merely <i>link</i> to the pics in question. My buddy Ryland, of A Boy and His Computer fame, has a similar set-up: if someone tries to link to or save a pic that is on his site, they&#8217;ll get another image instead that says, &#8220;You&#8217;re trying to steal my bandwidth, and that makes baby Jesus cry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, if the woman has actually stated on her site that &#8220;All images are copyright © 2088 by Her Royal Dumbass,&#8221; something similar, then she&#8217;s an idiot.</p>
<p>Something to be said about those old illustrations, though: Makes you wonder what our forefathers knew that we have somehow forgotten, like how to enjoy ourselves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
