<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congratulations to Violet Blue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/#comment-8104</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/#comment-8104</guid>
		<description>Tnoswad, your perspective, and your comment, is welcome, but I fear you&#039;ve come to the wrong place if you&#039;re looking for any agreement with your fundamental premise that children should not be exposed to intelligent writing about sex.  My own view is that children don&#039;t tend to read anything that&#039;s not of interest to them, and if they find something disturbing or unpleasant, they stop.

Given that we live in a culture that&#039;s absolutely soaked with sexual imagery and info, it&#039;s really not a question of whether your six year old is going to be exposed to same.  The only real question is &lt;i&gt;which particular&lt;/i&gt; sexual info and images are they going to stumble over first?  For most kids, that&#039;s porn, often quite bad porn.  If I were raising a smart, reading six year old boy, I&#039;d *much* rather his first exposure to sex stuff was Violet Blue&#039;s smart prose, sitting next to the comics as if it&#039;s nothing special or taboo, than some furtively-shared-on-the-playground glossy spread of a 19-year-old girl crying while getting double-penetrated by Ron Jeremy and his eighty-year-old-uncle.

Make it smart, put it in the morning newspaper, he&#039;s gonna read six paragraphs, decide it&#039;s boring, and move on.  I can&#039;t imagine him taking harm from this process.

But of course, he&#039;s your boy.  I&#039;m not trying to make your decisions for you, just explaining why I don&#039;t share your concern.  No, you&#039;re not being totalitarian -- but I do think you&#039;re being short-sighted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tnoswad, your perspective, and your comment, is welcome, but I fear you&#8217;ve come to the wrong place if you&#8217;re looking for any agreement with your fundamental premise that children should not be exposed to intelligent writing about sex.  My own view is that children don&#8217;t tend to read anything that&#8217;s not of interest to them, and if they find something disturbing or unpleasant, they stop.</p>
<p>Given that we live in a culture that&#8217;s absolutely soaked with sexual imagery and info, it&#8217;s really not a question of whether your six year old is going to be exposed to same.  The only real question is <i>which particular</i> sexual info and images are they going to stumble over first?  For most kids, that&#8217;s porn, often quite bad porn.  If I were raising a smart, reading six year old boy, I&#8217;d *much* rather his first exposure to sex stuff was Violet Blue&#8217;s smart prose, sitting next to the comics as if it&#8217;s nothing special or taboo, than some furtively-shared-on-the-playground glossy spread of a 19-year-old girl crying while getting double-penetrated by Ron Jeremy and his eighty-year-old-uncle.</p>
<p>Make it smart, put it in the morning newspaper, he&#8217;s gonna read six paragraphs, decide it&#8217;s boring, and move on.  I can&#8217;t imagine him taking harm from this process.</p>
<p>But of course, he&#8217;s your boy.  I&#8217;m not trying to make your decisions for you, just explaining why I don&#8217;t share your concern.  No, you&#8217;re not being totalitarian &#8212; but I do think you&#8217;re being short-sighted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnoswad</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/#comment-8077</link>
		<dc:creator>tnoswad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/#comment-8077</guid>
		<description>I have to confess...I live near San Francisco, and was a Chronicle subscriber.  I&#039;m very sex positive and all, but...my wife and I have two boys, 6 and 4.  The eldest can read.  The very racy adult content in the Chronicle (even prior to Ms. Blue), which is in the entertainment section - the same section as the comics - was a major factor for us in cancelling in our subscription.

Bully for Violet Blue, and all, and I really enjoy her stuff, online, as a grownup, but - am I being totalitarian when I ask, &quot;Is the same section of the morning paper as the comics the right place for this?&quot;  Our eldest son is very precocious, and very interested in reading the paper (as he sees us do it every morning).  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s ridiculous to think that the section that kids love most shouldn&#039;t be the same section as the one with the sex columnist.  What made me a newspaper reader as an adult was reading the comics as a kid.  I want my sons to have that experience.  Frankly, I don&#039;t think Violet Blue should be a part of that, and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s unreasonable for me to think that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to confess&#8230;I live near San Francisco, and was a Chronicle subscriber.  I&#8217;m very sex positive and all, but&#8230;my wife and I have two boys, 6 and 4.  The eldest can read.  The very racy adult content in the Chronicle (even prior to Ms. Blue), which is in the entertainment section &#8211; the same section as the comics &#8211; was a major factor for us in cancelling in our subscription.</p>
<p>Bully for Violet Blue, and all, and I really enjoy her stuff, online, as a grownup, but &#8211; am I being totalitarian when I ask, &#8220;Is the same section of the morning paper as the comics the right place for this?&#8221;  Our eldest son is very precocious, and very interested in reading the paper (as he sees us do it every morning).  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s ridiculous to think that the section that kids love most shouldn&#8217;t be the same section as the one with the sex columnist.  What made me a newspaper reader as an adult was reading the comics as a kid.  I want my sons to have that experience.  Frankly, I don&#8217;t think Violet Blue should be a part of that, and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s unreasonable for me to think that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desireous</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/#comment-7951</link>
		<dc:creator>Desireous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/#comment-7951</guid>
		<description>Well I don&#039;t know who she is but good for her! She sounds quite interesting from what she wrote. It&#039;s always great to hear of people achieving dreams!

hugs
Des</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I don&#8217;t know who she is but good for her! She sounds quite interesting from what she wrote. It&#8217;s always great to hear of people achieving dreams!</p>
<p>hugs<br />
Des</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/#comment-7944</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/08/29/congratulations-to-violet-blue/#comment-7944</guid>
		<description>I have to agree it IS very awesome news!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree it IS very awesome news!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

