<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ErosBlog FAQ</title>
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-28333</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-28333</guid>
					<description>Back in 2003 you wanted to know if anyone had a link to &quot;How to put a condom on with your mouth&quot;.

http://web.archive.org/web/20040410102442/http://www.westvillage.nl/how_to_put/condom.html

It'll be a little slow because it's using the Web Archive database; which is fantastic for finding those lost &quot;dead&quot; websites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2003 you wanted to know if anyone had a link to &#8220;How to put a condom on with your mouth&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href='http://web.archive.org/web/20040410102442/http://www.westvillage.nl/how_to_put/condom.html' rel='nofollow'>http://web.archive.org/web/20040410102442/http://www.westvillage.nl/how_to_put/condom.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be a little slow because it&#8217;s using the Web Archive database; which is fantastic for finding those lost &#8220;dead&#8221; websites!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Annie</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-9511</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-9511</guid>
					<description>Tina, I'm pretty new to blogging/blog reading? &amp;#38; I'm not sure if my behaviour would be the same as others. If I find a blog that has recent posts I enjoy I will go back to older posts, I suppose as a way to learn more about the author.

After all if I like the ideas expressed maybe I'll find some opinions on other things I never thought about that are interesting as well. (such as shave all pubes when casting a mold of your privates in plaster, thank you Bacchus)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tina, I&#8217;m pretty new to blogging/blog reading? &amp; I&#8217;m not sure if my behaviour would be the same as others. If I find a blog that has recent posts I enjoy I will go back to older posts, I suppose as a way to learn more about the author.</p>
<p>After all if I like the ideas expressed maybe I&#8217;ll find some opinions on other things I never thought about that are interesting as well. (such as shave all pubes when casting a mold of your privates in plaster, thank you Bacchus)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tina</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-9348</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-9348</guid>
					<description>When I first started my blog I tried to link to everyone and anyone in return for reciprocal links. I think the difference over a blog to a stand alone web site is the worry that your early work and entries might never be found or read by anyone other than yourself.

A web site sits waiting to be discovered and although you might consider a blog to be in exactly the same position there is that fear that your writing daily entries and what could be some of your best work is archived away before it is discovered. Who really reads blog entries more than a month old?

I have been slowly cutting back on my reciprocals, its a catch 22 you want to delete them as they were a bad idea at the birth of your blog but then you did approach the other site owner asking them for a link in the first instance.

Tina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first started my blog I tried to link to everyone and anyone in return for reciprocal links. I think the difference over a blog to a stand alone web site is the worry that your early work and entries might never be found or read by anyone other than yourself.</p>
<p>A web site sits waiting to be discovered and although you might consider a blog to be in exactly the same position there is that fear that your writing daily entries and what could be some of your best work is archived away before it is discovered. Who really reads blog entries more than a month old?</p>
<p>I have been slowly cutting back on my reciprocals, its a catch 22 you want to delete them as they were a bad idea at the birth of your blog but then you did approach the other site owner asking them for a link in the first instance.</p>
<p>Tina
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gandalfe</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8955</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8955</guid>
					<description>What a superb reference for admins of all sites. This site should be considered a 101 course. Eros has been one of two adult sites that I frequent, DOMAI being the other. Thanks for being there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a superb reference for admins of all sites. This site should be considered a 101 course. Eros has been one of two adult sites that I frequent, DOMAI being the other. Thanks for being there!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8950</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8950</guid>
					<description>&quot;Two stupids don't make a smart&quot; -- I've never heard that, but I like it!  And it fits this exactly.  The folks who &lt;i&gt;think&lt;/i&gt; the link reflects badly on you are the ones making the real mistake -- and you'd be making another one if you bought into their skewed perspective.

Thanks for taking this the right way, it could have gone different.

I just realized there's one more piece to this.  If someone writes and asks for a link removal, no matter how polite their request, it's going to be experienced as an aggressive condemnation.  I've gotten these requests -- &quot;Remove my link at once, I don't want to be associated with your stinky porn, the story on my site was educational and not intended to be erotic you sicko!&quot; -- and it really is an &quot;I despise everything you stand for, I don't want any of your stinkiness to get anywhere near me&quot; gesture.  Nobody -- not even would-be pedophiles -- reacts well to that sort of attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Two stupids don&#8217;t make a smart&#8221; &#8212; I&#8217;ve never heard that, but I like it!  And it fits this exactly.  The folks who <i>think</i> the link reflects badly on you are the ones making the real mistake &#8212; and you&#8217;d be making another one if you bought into their skewed perspective.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking this the right way, it could have gone different.</p>
<p>I just realized there&#8217;s one more piece to this.  If someone writes and asks for a link removal, no matter how polite their request, it&#8217;s going to be experienced as an aggressive condemnation.  I&#8217;ve gotten these requests &#8212; &#8220;Remove my link at once, I don&#8217;t want to be associated with your stinky porn, the story on my site was educational and not intended to be erotic you sicko!&#8221; &#8212; and it really is an &#8220;I despise everything you stand for, I don&#8217;t want any of your stinkiness to get anywhere near me&#8221; gesture.  Nobody &#8212; not even would-be pedophiles &#8212; reacts well to that sort of attack.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kaya</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8949</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8949</guid>
					<description>Actually yes. And thank you for it. It makes perfect sense and is in fact the &quot;obvious answer&quot; that I expected it to be. (and still hoped it wouldn't be..lol)

I thoroughly related to the crazy cat lady analogy because that's ME. So that helped alot. 

I agree that link association should be entirely one way but it's not. I've been asked &quot;do you know you are linked at 'such and such' site?? Do you KNOW what they talk about there!!?&quot; As if I'm supposed to have some explanation for the content and why I'm in it. The only content I can control is mine. 

But I cannot stave off the stupidity of others by responding with equal stupidity. Two stupids don't make a smart. So thank you for pointing that out to me. 

&quot;I'd no more pull a link at the source's request than I'd pull a book I wrote from publication at a reader's request&quot; 

That puts it into perspective for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually yes. And thank you for it. It makes perfect sense and is in fact the &#8220;obvious answer&#8221; that I expected it to be. (and still hoped it wouldn&#8217;t be..lol)</p>
<p>I thoroughly related to the crazy cat lady analogy because that&#8217;s ME. So that helped alot. </p>
<p>I agree that link association should be entirely one way but it&#8217;s not. I&#8217;ve been asked &#8220;do you know you are linked at &#8217;such and such&#8217; site?? Do you KNOW what they talk about there!!?&#8221; As if I&#8217;m supposed to have some explanation for the content and why I&#8217;m in it. The only content I can control is mine. </p>
<p>But I cannot stave off the stupidity of others by responding with equal stupidity. Two stupids don&#8217;t make a smart. So thank you for pointing that out to me. </p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d no more pull a link at the source&#8217;s request than I&#8217;d pull a book I wrote from publication at a reader&#8217;s request&#8221; </p>
<p>That puts it into perspective for me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8939</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 04:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8939</guid>
					<description>Kaya, you're not going to like my answer, I fear.  In my opinion -- which you asked for, sorry -- you're the one who is being wrongheaded to expect any influence over where your link appears.  They're not showing bad taste in refusing your request -- they are, quite rightly in my view, refusing a mildly bizarre request that, from their perspective, should never have appeared in their inbox.  

Obviously I need to explain that.

As I said in the FAQ, the act of putting something up on the internet is an open-ended invitation to the entire universe to link to whatever you put up.  Linking to things is what the internet -- or rather, the World Wide Web -- is &lt;b&gt;for&lt;/b&gt;.  In most cases, putting something up is an &lt;i&gt;eager solicitation&lt;/i&gt; for linkage.

So, for you to put up a web resource and then to ask someone -- &lt;i&gt;anyone&lt;/i&gt; -- to take down a link they put up, is going to strike netheads as bizare, crazy, irrational behavior.  You ever see a crazy cat lady come running out of her apartment and scream at the garbagemen for stealing the dirty cat litter that she, herself, put in the dumpster six hours previously?  I'm picking a deliberately extreme example for a reason.  To someone who is, like me, a passionate fan of the internet because of the organic way it organizes the world's data, link removal requests trigger exactly that intense &quot;What the hell?&quot; reaction the garbage men are going to feel toward the cat lady.  And the next reaction is &quot;Fuck no!  Putting up links is what I &lt;b&gt;do&lt;/b&gt;.&quot;  I'd no more pull a link at the source's request than I'd pull a book I wrote from publication at a reader's request.  It's not a reasonable request, it's destructive to whatever I've been working on, and I'm going to ignore it (at best) or be rude (on a bad day).

I am, obviously, an absolutist.

However, note this has nothing to do with &quot;freedom&quot; -- although that's out there.  It's not that I refuse to honor delink requests because I can get away with it -- though I can -- it's because there's something fundamentally wrong with the request itself.  It's not about &quot;freedom&quot; to do something rude or tasteless, it's about the lack of any need to cater to somebody who doesn't even understand that they are asking me to commit a minor act of destruction.

So no, in my ethics there's nothing rude or tasteless about refusing delinking requests.  And, indeed, honoring them comes perilously close to the &quot;blog vandalism&quot; I've ranted against previously.  Accomodating delinking requests is, in my view, active badness, albeit quite minor.

That said, I do from time to time get incoming links I wish weren't there.  I had a link for awhile from a quasi-Gorean who liked to talk about how slave training was much easier if you started training your slavegirls when they were thirteen or so, ugh.  But I didn't ask for the link to be removed, for the reasons above and because a link &lt;i&gt;from&lt;/i&gt; him doesn't associate my views with his.  Link association is *entirely* one way, there's no contaminating backflow.  We have neither the right, nor the duty, nor indeed any reason, to attempt to police incoming links.

Whew!  Enough answer for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaya, you&#8217;re not going to like my answer, I fear.  In my opinion &#8212; which you asked for, sorry &#8212; you&#8217;re the one who is being wrongheaded to expect any influence over where your link appears.  They&#8217;re not showing bad taste in refusing your request &#8212; they are, quite rightly in my view, refusing a mildly bizarre request that, from their perspective, should never have appeared in their inbox.  </p>
<p>Obviously I need to explain that.</p>
<p>As I said in the FAQ, the act of putting something up on the internet is an open-ended invitation to the entire universe to link to whatever you put up.  Linking to things is what the internet &#8212; or rather, the World Wide Web &#8212; is <b>for</b>.  In most cases, putting something up is an <i>eager solicitation</i> for linkage.</p>
<p>So, for you to put up a web resource and then to ask someone &#8212; <i>anyone</i> &#8212; to take down a link they put up, is going to strike netheads as bizare, crazy, irrational behavior.  You ever see a crazy cat lady come running out of her apartment and scream at the garbagemen for stealing the dirty cat litter that she, herself, put in the dumpster six hours previously?  I&#8217;m picking a deliberately extreme example for a reason.  To someone who is, like me, a passionate fan of the internet because of the organic way it organizes the world&#8217;s data, link removal requests trigger exactly that intense &#8220;What the hell?&#8221; reaction the garbage men are going to feel toward the cat lady.  And the next reaction is &#8220;Fuck no!  Putting up links is what I <b>do</b>.&#8221;  I&#8217;d no more pull a link at the source&#8217;s request than I&#8217;d pull a book I wrote from publication at a reader&#8217;s request.  It&#8217;s not a reasonable request, it&#8217;s destructive to whatever I&#8217;ve been working on, and I&#8217;m going to ignore it (at best) or be rude (on a bad day).</p>
<p>I am, obviously, an absolutist.</p>
<p>However, note this has nothing to do with &#8220;freedom&#8221; &#8212; although that&#8217;s out there.  It&#8217;s not that I refuse to honor delink requests because I can get away with it &#8212; though I can &#8212; it&#8217;s because there&#8217;s something fundamentally wrong with the request itself.  It&#8217;s not about &#8220;freedom&#8221; to do something rude or tasteless, it&#8217;s about the lack of any need to cater to somebody who doesn&#8217;t even understand that they are asking me to commit a minor act of destruction.</p>
<p>So no, in my ethics there&#8217;s nothing rude or tasteless about refusing delinking requests.  And, indeed, honoring them comes perilously close to the &#8220;blog vandalism&#8221; I&#8217;ve ranted against previously.  Accomodating delinking requests is, in my view, active badness, albeit quite minor.</p>
<p>That said, I do from time to time get incoming links I wish weren&#8217;t there.  I had a link for awhile from a quasi-Gorean who liked to talk about how slave training was much easier if you started training your slavegirls when they were thirteen or so, ugh.  But I didn&#8217;t ask for the link to be removed, for the reasons above and because a link <i>from</i> him doesn&#8217;t associate my views with his.  Link association is *entirely* one way, there&#8217;s no contaminating backflow.  We have neither the right, nor the duty, nor indeed any reason, to attempt to police incoming links.</p>
<p>Whew!  Enough answer for you?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kaya</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8931</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 04:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8931</guid>
					<description>I have a question that may have an obvious answer but I'll ask anyway. What's your opinion about having your blog linked somewhere that you don't want it to be? 

I used to be of the mind that if someone linked to me, out of some warped politeness, I should link back. Then it occured to me that my link list is a reflection of my interests and, as an extension of that, my approval. So I became a bit more selective on links. 

Now I find my link on sites that I don't like, don't approve of, and want in no way to be associated with, yet the site owners claim internet &quot;freedom&quot; and refuse to take it down. 

I guess I can't argue with internet &quot;freedom&quot;. Links are free and I certainly can't tell someone else what do with their own site, but this has to be some form of bad taste at least. I'm not making a big stink about it. I asked if they would remove it, they refused and I left it alone. 

So curious, since you posted your link policy, what your opinion was on that. 

Thanks. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question that may have an obvious answer but I&#8217;ll ask anyway. What&#8217;s your opinion about having your blog linked somewhere that you don&#8217;t want it to be? </p>
<p>I used to be of the mind that if someone linked to me, out of some warped politeness, I should link back. Then it occured to me that my link list is a reflection of my interests and, as an extension of that, my approval. So I became a bit more selective on links. </p>
<p>Now I find my link on sites that I don&#8217;t like, don&#8217;t approve of, and want in no way to be associated with, yet the site owners claim internet &#8220;freedom&#8221; and refuse to take it down. </p>
<p>I guess I can&#8217;t argue with internet &#8220;freedom&#8221;. Links are free and I certainly can&#8217;t tell someone else what do with their own site, but this has to be some form of bad taste at least. I&#8217;m not making a big stink about it. I asked if they would remove it, they refused and I left it alone. </p>
<p>So curious, since you posted your link policy, what your opinion was on that. </p>
<p>Thanks. :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vixen</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8849</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8849</guid>
					<description>I hear you about link trades. When I was a newbie blogger I felt as if I should post people's links. After all they were loyal readers right? Yeah, I was naive.

These days I send a reply that I'll look over their site and consider them. If they don't fit with me I don't put them on the link list and I don't feel guilty about it. 

Looking at stats is so entertaining for me. I love seeing what countries readers are from or what search terms brought them to my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you about link trades. When I was a newbie blogger I felt as if I should post people&#8217;s links. After all they were loyal readers right? Yeah, I was naive.</p>
<p>These days I send a reply that I&#8217;ll look over their site and consider them. If they don&#8217;t fit with me I don&#8217;t put them on the link list and I don&#8217;t feel guilty about it. </p>
<p>Looking at stats is so entertaining for me. I love seeing what countries readers are from or what search terms brought them to my site.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8835</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/09/14/erosblog-faq/#comment-8835</guid>
					<description>I guess I'm just horrified you have to say some of them. As you know, I disagree with you on where the line is drawn but it's your site and some of those questions imply you are obligated to do something for the readers. Do they feel the same way if someone invites them over for dinner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m just horrified you have to say some of them. As you know, I disagree with you on where the line is drawn but it&#8217;s your site and some of those questions imply you are obligated to do something for the readers. Do they feel the same way if someone invites them over for dinner?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
