<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Hates Sex Blogs Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 07:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: krs10waz</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-38755</link>
		<dc:creator>krs10waz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-38755</guid>
		<description>Ohohoh....but you're back @ number ONE!! Yippee (Thank goodness....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohohoh&#8230;.but you&#8217;re back @ number ONE!! Yippee (Thank goodness&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alden</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16652</link>
		<dc:creator>Alden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16652</guid>
		<description>ErosBlog is currently showing as the #1 result for "sex blog" for me.  Looks like they're continuing to tweak the results. :)

I've often been surprised as to how much difference Google rankings make.  One part of my site went from an average of 150 visits per day to an average of 50 after it was demoted in Google's results. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ErosBlog is currently showing as the #1 result for &#8220;sex blog&#8221; for me.  Looks like they&#8217;re continuing to tweak the results. :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often been surprised as to how much difference Google rankings make.  One part of my site went from an average of 150 visits per day to an average of 50 after it was demoted in Google&#8217;s results. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16579</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16579</guid>
		<description>Susie, I'm not a search engine optimization guy; I've always followed the Google advice of just writing a good site and trusting that the search engines will like it.

So much for doing the right thing.

With that disclaimer, my theory:  Sex spam sites use adult keywords hundreds of times to rank well in search engines.  (It's much more complicated, but every strategy involves the necessary keywords.)  On the other hand, an adult blog uses those same keywords tens of thousands of time over multiple years.  So when Google devises a spiffy new algorithm to attack the spam blogs, they penalize sites with the adult keywords -- but they tuned it wrong, and it hit hardest the sites with the most volume of those keywords.  

So that killed a few of the stupid obvious spam sites with tens of thousands of stacked keywords, then it killed us, but it petered out before hurting the vast majority of spam blogs, which are quick "throw against wall and see what sticks" efforts using the keywords mere hundreds of times.

That's my guess, and it's just a guess.

Problem is, Google may not care -- it's unclear if they consider *any* adult site a desireable element in their search listings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susie, I&#8217;m not a search engine optimization guy; I&#8217;ve always followed the Google advice of just writing a good site and trusting that the search engines will like it.</p>
<p>So much for doing the right thing.</p>
<p>With that disclaimer, my theory:  Sex spam sites use adult keywords hundreds of times to rank well in search engines.  (It&#8217;s much more complicated, but every strategy involves the necessary keywords.)  On the other hand, an adult blog uses those same keywords tens of thousands of time over multiple years.  So when Google devises a spiffy new algorithm to attack the spam blogs, they penalize sites with the adult keywords &#8212; but they tuned it wrong, and it hit hardest the sites with the most volume of those keywords.  </p>
<p>So that killed a few of the stupid obvious spam sites with tens of thousands of stacked keywords, then it killed us, but it petered out before hurting the vast majority of spam blogs, which are quick &#8220;throw against wall and see what sticks&#8221; efforts using the keywords mere hundreds of times.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my guess, and it&#8217;s just a guess.</p>
<p>Problem is, Google may not care &#8212; it&#8217;s unclear if they consider *any* adult site a desireable element in their search listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susie Bright</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16561</link>
		<dc:creator>Susie Bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16561</guid>
		<description>I've been thinking of you ever since I got a call from Babeland a few weeks ago about this. You sound so calm; I've just been livid. What do you think is going on? xoxoxox susie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking of you ever since I got a call from Babeland a few weeks ago about this. You sound so calm; I&#8217;ve just been livid. What do you think is going on? xoxoxox susie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehe</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16557</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16557</guid>
		<description>My traffic's dropped too... *cries*

And since Blogger is now a google product, does that mean they're montioring and could potentially take the blogger writers down?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My traffic&#8217;s dropped too&#8230; *cries*</p>
<p>And since Blogger is now a google product, does that mean they&#8217;re montioring and could potentially take the blogger writers down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Elvis</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16551</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Elvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16551</guid>
		<description>BoingBoing has some good info:

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/12/28/update_on_google_dis.html

But they're saying it's mostly fixed, which it sure ain't (see chelsea girl's blog for some details).

With google's deaf ear, it's unclear if it's any use to complain; it isn't the first time I've seen 'em do this, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BoingBoing has some good info:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/12/28/update_on_google_dis.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.boingboing.net/2006/12/28/update_on_google_dis.html</a></p>
<p>But they&#8217;re saying it&#8217;s mostly fixed, which it sure ain&#8217;t (see chelsea girl&#8217;s blog for some details).</p>
<p>With google&#8217;s deaf ear, it&#8217;s unclear if it&#8217;s any use to complain; it isn&#8217;t the first time I&#8217;ve seen &#8216;em do this, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoddessChylde</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16535</link>
		<dc:creator>GoddessChylde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16535</guid>
		<description>Those Bastards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those Bastards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chelsea girl</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16515</link>
		<dc:creator>chelsea girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16515</guid>
		<description>You and me both, baby. I'm stuck out in that Google gulag. The sucking sound is near deafening.

kissykiss,
chelsea girl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and me both, baby. I&#8217;m stuck out in that Google gulag. The sucking sound is near deafening.</p>
<p>kissykiss,<br />
chelsea girl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desireous</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16500</link>
		<dc:creator>desireous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16500</guid>
		<description>You know I just did a search on google using my blog title, "Desireous" and my actual Desireous blog didn't even appear in the listings on the first or second page (I didn't look any further than that) How odd! It brought up my profile and my other blogs and it brought up other blogs that link to me but it didn't bring up my blog which it always used to. Very very interesting. 


Hugs
Des</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I just did a search on google using my blog title, &#8220;Desireous&#8221; and my actual Desireous blog didn&#8217;t even appear in the listings on the first or second page (I didn&#8217;t look any further than that) How odd! It brought up my profile and my other blogs and it brought up other blogs that link to me but it didn&#8217;t bring up my blog which it always used to. Very very interesting. </p>
<p>Hugs<br />
Des</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socks Manly</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16499</link>
		<dc:creator>Socks Manly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2006/12/28/google-hates-sex-blogs-now/#comment-16499</guid>
		<description>We are getting killed too dude! Site is looking better than ever, and google is trashing us :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are getting killed too dude! Site is looking better than ever, and google is trashing us :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
