<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vintage Lesbian Porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lef</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-152055</link>
		<dc:creator>lef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-152055</guid>
		<description>You would make a very bad pornographer.
Why all that fuss with &quot;identification&quot; and &quot;label&quot;.
It&#039;s called &quot;lesbian porn&quot; because it&#039;s easier to memorize than &quot;women who may or may not be actual lesbian and/or bisexual having sex together&quot;.
It&#039;s just the same everywhere.
A lot of &quot;gay porn actors&quot; are actually 100% hetero and happily married. Hard to believe ? Money buys everything.

Why the focus on lesbian porn ?
It&#039;s just the same for every porn. No, for every kind of cinema. Actors do what they are told to. Sometimes they suggest some ideas, but that&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would make a very bad pornographer.<br />
Why all that fuss with &#8220;identification&#8221; and &#8220;label&#8221;.<br />
It&#8217;s called &#8220;lesbian porn&#8221; because it&#8217;s easier to memorize than &#8220;women who may or may not be actual lesbian and/or bisexual having sex together&#8221;.<br />
It&#8217;s just the same everywhere.<br />
A lot of &#8220;gay porn actors&#8221; are actually 100% hetero and happily married. Hard to believe ? Money buys everything.</p>
<p>Why the focus on lesbian porn ?<br />
It&#8217;s just the same for every porn. No, for every kind of cinema. Actors do what they are told to. Sometimes they suggest some ideas, but that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-148025</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-148025</guid>
		<description>Just read a blog by a girl about how all girls are bisexual, or at least bisexually curious.  Very insightful, I thought.  Made me look up lesbian in google and found your site.
http://lovinglyshared.blogspot.com/
But maybe it&#039;s us guys that like women together, not the women themselves....... like how uncomfortable they are in this pic.  Or are they like that because back then it was very taboo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read a blog by a girl about how all girls are bisexual, or at least bisexually curious.  Very insightful, I thought.  Made me look up lesbian in google and found your site.<br />
<a href="http://lovinglyshared.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://lovinglyshared.blogspot.com/</a><br />
But maybe it&#8217;s us guys that like women together, not the women themselves&#8230;&#8230;. like how uncomfortable they are in this pic.  Or are they like that because back then it was very taboo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ames</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-146374</link>
		<dc:creator>Ames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-146374</guid>
		<description>i think its funny lol. those models are definetly uncomfortable. it waz like 40&#039;s/ 50&#039;s. lesbian or not, it was shunned upon. so they were taking a pretty big risk, no wonder theyre uncomfortable. why concentrate on how erotic or un-erotic the picture is when its not real.... and yeah im gay so i would know. being with a woman is an original, beautiful experience with lustful exhilaration. want to get off or judge lesbians? go find that and then judge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think its funny lol. those models are definetly uncomfortable. it waz like 40&#8242;s/ 50&#8242;s. lesbian or not, it was shunned upon. so they were taking a pretty big risk, no wonder theyre uncomfortable. why concentrate on how erotic or un-erotic the picture is when its not real&#8230;. and yeah im gay so i would know. being with a woman is an original, beautiful experience with lustful exhilaration. want to get off or judge lesbians? go find that and then judge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katieslove</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-146164</link>
		<dc:creator>katieslove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-146164</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t know.......i kinda like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know&#8230;&#8230;.i kinda like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-142839</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-142839</guid>
		<description>The one on the left looks like she might be Snooki&#039;s mom....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one on the left looks like she might be Snooki&#8217;s mom&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-61456</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-61456</guid>
		<description>yeah, i understand your point, the word is thrown around irresponsibly, but there is plenty of vintage porn with ACTUAL lesbians, and they arent that hard to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i understand your point, the word is thrown around irresponsibly, but there is plenty of vintage porn with ACTUAL lesbians, and they arent that hard to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred lapides</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-20637</link>
		<dc:creator>fred lapides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/01/23/vintage-lesbian-porn/#comment-20637</guid>
		<description>Fret not labe;s/./ Calling  a shot &quot;lesbians&quot; is for the viewer (reader) and not a description of a model&#039;s hankerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fret not labe;s/./ Calling  a shot &#8220;lesbians&#8221; is for the viewer (reader) and not a description of a model&#8217;s hankerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

