Napoleon, I haven’t looked at every picture on that site. But they are *very* diverse. There are furries, anthropomorphized wolves, all sorts of things.
I did see some strap-ons. I also saw some ambiguous pictures. Not “most”, not by a long shot. But in the case of the drawings featuring penises, why do you assume “women”? Those are the flaws in your assumptions I am talking about.
Feminine features do not a woman make, especially when there’s a countervailing penis to confound your neat taxonomies.
I dunno the answer to your what-the-fuck, but since the “most” was a gross overstatement that was boring to address, I took the easy road by pointing out that you were making an assumption you didn’t even seem aware of.
Speaking of diverse, what I love is the age differential–and the self-conscious playfulness built into it, like in “Madam Yolande has a terrible odor.” And actually, the more I look at that panel, the more it almost starts looking like an extremely funny hot-for-teacher shot.
It’s very funny because it seems that I cannot post here as Camille (and I AM Camille).
Just some comments:
Cheezedog: the drawings are rough because I don’t want to spare time in this blog. The drawings are a sort of exercise not for looking smart.
Bacchus: the “girls with penis” serie was created because it was the strangest things I saw in erogic drawings (in manga or Baldazzini). I try to draw things you don’t see every where, so cute girls may have a penis, it’s funny and sexy.
Ssarah: thank you for your comment.
And again thank you Bacchus for this post.