<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Man In Chains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VagrantSoul</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-21133</link>
		<dc:creator>VagrantSoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-21133</guid>
		<description>Most ppl find eroticism in some movie, and/or magazines - and not really porn. I&#039;m guessing someone sent you something that upset you to the point that you need to put discliamer&#039;s up? Don&#039;t threaten us with a good time! 

So bring on your ultimate weapon, cuz like everyone else (and I thnk you did it on purpose) I&#039;m curious now too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most ppl find eroticism in some movie, and/or magazines &#8211; and not really porn. I&#8217;m guessing someone sent you something that upset you to the point that you need to put discliamer&#8217;s up? Don&#8217;t threaten us with a good time! </p>
<p>So bring on your ultimate weapon, cuz like everyone else (and I thnk you did it on purpose) I&#8217;m curious now too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadi</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-21050</link>
		<dc:creator>nadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-21050</guid>
		<description>So how many requests would it take for you to post it?  Should I start a petition?

nadi xx

ps. don&#039;t worry, I AM kidding... about the petition...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how many requests would it take for you to post it?  Should I start a petition?</p>
<p>nadi xx</p>
<p>ps. don&#8217;t worry, I AM kidding&#8230; about the petition&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-21038</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-21038</guid>
		<description>Nadi, of course there could be.  I&#039;m making a statement about likelihood, not impossibility.

And even there, it&#039;s certainly possible I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nadi, of course there could be.  I&#8217;m making a statement about likelihood, not impossibility.</p>
<p>And even there, it&#8217;s certainly possible I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nadi</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-21031</link>
		<dc:creator>nadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-21031</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do you really want to see the cartoon drawing I’ve got of a sweet young lady making a mouthful (and what a mouthful!) of a horse’s cock? &quot;

Hell, yes! :)

&quot;However, I don’t think it’s very likely there are any avid practitioners of horse cock sucking reading this blog&quot;

Umm....
Might I suggest there could at least be aspiring practitioners?  Ones who might be reluctant (or warned against) admitting it?

nadi xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do you really want to see the cartoon drawing I’ve got of a sweet young lady making a mouthful (and what a mouthful!) of a horse’s cock? &#8221;</p>
<p>Hell, yes! :)</p>
<p>&#8220;However, I don’t think it’s very likely there are any avid practitioners of horse cock sucking reading this blog&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm&#8230;.<br />
Might I suggest there could at least be aspiring practitioners?  Ones who might be reluctant (or warned against) admitting it?</p>
<p>nadi xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-20911</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-20911</guid>
		<description>Hi, Lurking.

If you trawl through my archives, you&#039;ll often find me giving warnings (akin to the comic threat in this case) about the risk of seeing images the readers might not want to see.  

I&#039;m generally eager to avoid condemning any particular sexual activity or hurting the feelings of the practitioners thereof.  However, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s very likely there are any avid practitioners of horse cock sucking reading this blog.  (I&#039;ve never actually encountered a credible tale of anyone who does this for sexual gratification.)

I could be wrong.  But even if I am, I didn&#039;t condemn the practice (nor would I) nor mock nor judge its practitioners.  I just acknowledged (warned) that many of my readers might not enjoy seeing a fantasy image of it.  And I tried to do &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; in a manifestly light-hearted way, without using any derogatory language that might unduly undermine my general policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Lurking.</p>
<p>If you trawl through my archives, you&#8217;ll often find me giving warnings (akin to the comic threat in this case) about the risk of seeing images the readers might not want to see.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m generally eager to avoid condemning any particular sexual activity or hurting the feelings of the practitioners thereof.  However, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s very likely there are any avid practitioners of horse cock sucking reading this blog.  (I&#8217;ve never actually encountered a credible tale of anyone who does this for sexual gratification.)</p>
<p>I could be wrong.  But even if I am, I didn&#8217;t condemn the practice (nor would I) nor mock nor judge its practitioners.  I just acknowledged (warned) that many of my readers might not enjoy seeing a fantasy image of it.  And I tried to do <b>that</b> in a manifestly light-hearted way, without using any derogatory language that might unduly undermine my general policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurking</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-20895</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-20895</guid>
		<description>Bacchus, I am a bit confused about your last comment.  I have been reading Eros Blog for years, and you have always touted the fact that the environment here is sex positive.  No matter how bizarre a picture may seem, it is never appropriate to make a negative comment about it.  

Perhaps this is why I am confused when you use the phrase &quot;eye and brain bleach&quot; to describe a picture.  It&#039;s not that I am interested in seeing cartoon beastiality, but it seems like that comment goes against the sex positive nature of Eros Blog.

Not trying to troll, it&#039;s just that I can&#039;t recall you ever making a comment of this kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bacchus, I am a bit confused about your last comment.  I have been reading Eros Blog for years, and you have always touted the fact that the environment here is sex positive.  No matter how bizarre a picture may seem, it is never appropriate to make a negative comment about it.  </p>
<p>Perhaps this is why I am confused when you use the phrase &#8220;eye and brain bleach&#8221; to describe a picture.  It&#8217;s not that I am interested in seeing cartoon beastiality, but it seems like that comment goes against the sex positive nature of Eros Blog.</p>
<p>Not trying to troll, it&#8217;s just that I can&#8217;t recall you ever making a comment of this kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someone</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-20865</link>
		<dc:creator>someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/02/19/man-in-chains/#comment-20865</guid>
		<description>oooh sweet young lady sounds nice... lets have it...

and needing a bit of a brainwash afterward never stopped u before bacchus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oooh sweet young lady sounds nice&#8230; lets have it&#8230;</p>
<p>and needing a bit of a brainwash afterward never stopped u before bacchus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

