<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Daily Tang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soulless</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29288</link>
		<dc:creator>Soulless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 22:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29288</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you wrote this post. I have been thinking the same thing about video and audio on the web.

I especially dislike audio and video that starts playing before I have the option to choose whether I want to see it or hear it.

I don&#039;t mind video or audio, I would just prefer a link to the source rather than an embedded flash player. Then I can choose to follow the link if I feel there is a compelling reason.

I agree also that I don&#039;t want to wait for an entire 4 minute or 45 minute segment to play. If you could &quot;deep link&quot; to get right to the salient bits, that would be really cool.

My experience with audio and video is largely this: If it&#039;s flash or if it streams I will tend to skip it. Still too many drop-outs and issues with the quality of the stream. Digital cable even suffers from this. If I can download it, I do. But then the download gets filed somewhere until some imaginary time in the future when I can watch or listen to the entire thing--which never seems to arrive because I&#039;m downloading new stuff continually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you wrote this post. I have been thinking the same thing about video and audio on the web.</p>
<p>I especially dislike audio and video that starts playing before I have the option to choose whether I want to see it or hear it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind video or audio, I would just prefer a link to the source rather than an embedded flash player. Then I can choose to follow the link if I feel there is a compelling reason.</p>
<p>I agree also that I don&#8217;t want to wait for an entire 4 minute or 45 minute segment to play. If you could &#8220;deep link&#8221; to get right to the salient bits, that would be really cool.</p>
<p>My experience with audio and video is largely this: If it&#8217;s flash or if it streams I will tend to skip it. Still too many drop-outs and issues with the quality of the stream. Digital cable even suffers from this. If I can download it, I do. But then the download gets filed somewhere until some imaginary time in the future when I can watch or listen to the entire thing&#8211;which never seems to arrive because I&#8217;m downloading new stuff continually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graydancer</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29195</link>
		<dc:creator>Graydancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29195</guid>
		<description>Flattery? So THAT&#039;S what it takes? :) I&#039;ll be sure to put you in the next Ropecast...

Well, obviously I&#039;m not quite with you there - I think that the only superiority of any medium lies in its ability to get the message across. And there is certainly some visceral enjoyment in hearing or seeing someone rather than simply reading them - though perhaps the most fun is someone like Violet Blue, who combines all three.

I would have to disagree with the &quot;linear&quot; comment, especially in regard to podcasts. POD stands for &quot;Portable On-Demand&quot;: in other words, I listen to it when I want. Kind of like skipping around your site, I can skip from Fetish Flame to Left, Right, and Center depending on my mood, and come back to or leave it as may be. The audio is my companion as I do dishes, cook, ride my bike...and saying that it&#039;s only linear, but text isn&#039;t, is kind of like saying that matter order words doesn&#039;t in what your.

And besides, we all like flattery. I had one Master tell me that he used my podcast to put his sub to sleep every night...what higher praise could I ask for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flattery? So THAT&#8217;S what it takes? :) I&#8217;ll be sure to put you in the next Ropecast&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, obviously I&#8217;m not quite with you there &#8211; I think that the only superiority of any medium lies in its ability to get the message across. And there is certainly some visceral enjoyment in hearing or seeing someone rather than simply reading them &#8211; though perhaps the most fun is someone like Violet Blue, who combines all three.</p>
<p>I would have to disagree with the &#8220;linear&#8221; comment, especially in regard to podcasts. POD stands for &#8220;Portable On-Demand&#8221;: in other words, I listen to it when I want. Kind of like skipping around your site, I can skip from Fetish Flame to Left, Right, and Center depending on my mood, and come back to or leave it as may be. The audio is my companion as I do dishes, cook, ride my bike&#8230;and saying that it&#8217;s only linear, but text isn&#8217;t, is kind of like saying that matter order words doesn&#8217;t in what your.</p>
<p>And besides, we all like flattery. I had one Master tell me that he used my podcast to put his sub to sleep every night&#8230;what higher praise could I ask for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viviane</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29169</link>
		<dc:creator>Viviane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 03:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29169</guid>
		<description>Hm, I never thought of podcasts that way...linear. I like them for the radio programs I can catch during the day from NPR.

It was so great to watch it and see what nice things they said about Sexoteric! It made me quite happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, I never thought of podcasts that way&#8230;linear. I like them for the radio programs I can catch during the day from NPR.</p>
<p>It was so great to watch it and see what nice things they said about Sexoteric! It made me quite happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim DeSade</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29155</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim DeSade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 23:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29155</guid>
		<description>I agree - i read way more blogs than watch vlogs for the same reason.  While cable/sat tv IS narrowcasting the ability of the web to go even narrower is intriguing though.  
We&#039;re going to see a lot more well produced video content on every subject you can think of... and not so well produced  come to think of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; i read way more blogs than watch vlogs for the same reason.  While cable/sat tv IS narrowcasting the ability of the web to go even narrower is intriguing though.<br />
We&#8217;re going to see a lot more well produced video content on every subject you can think of&#8230; and not so well produced  come to think of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29140</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29140</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not much into podcasts and certainly don&#039;t watch them on my i-pod. WAY too small a screen, I&#039;d go blind. 

But, I giggled, Bacchus, at your comment about wearing headphones while commuting and not being able to hear the announcements over the loudspeaker. In NYC, it&#039;s so hit or miss if you can hear them anyway, most riders never take their headphones off and listen.

Eve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not much into podcasts and certainly don&#8217;t watch them on my i-pod. WAY too small a screen, I&#8217;d go blind. </p>
<p>But, I giggled, Bacchus, at your comment about wearing headphones while commuting and not being able to hear the announcements over the loudspeaker. In NYC, it&#8217;s so hit or miss if you can hear them anyway, most riders never take their headphones off and listen.</p>
<p>Eve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Elvis</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29139</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Elvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29139</guid>
		<description>Totally with you on this. Video/audio is so much slower than I can parse info in text; anything that links to video on major news sites, I almost alwats click over. I don&#039;t want video; give me text and if applicable, still frames. Information is, and always has been, better tranmitted in words than in pictures or sound. 

Sure; there are exceptions. But as a rule, text is simply better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally with you on this. Video/audio is so much slower than I can parse info in text; anything that links to video on major news sites, I almost alwats click over. I don&#8217;t want video; give me text and if applicable, still frames. Information is, and always has been, better tranmitted in words than in pictures or sound. </p>
<p>Sure; there are exceptions. But as a rule, text is simply better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aero</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29134</link>
		<dc:creator>Aero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 13:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/05/03/your-daily-tang/#comment-29134</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m addicted to podcasts because then I can listen and do something else at the same time.  It&#039;s the perfect input level for my brain.  

I have little patience for video, though, because of the reasons you mention.  Unless it&#039;s a really compelling topic or by fascinating people, meh, I let my short attention span take over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m addicted to podcasts because then I can listen and do something else at the same time.  It&#8217;s the perfect input level for my brain.  </p>
<p>I have little patience for video, though, because of the reasons you mention.  Unless it&#8217;s a really compelling topic or by fascinating people, meh, I let my short attention span take over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

