<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bondage Whipping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-91903</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-91903</guid>
		<description>Lucky boy, wish that was me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky boy, wish that was me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Whiplash</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36310</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Whiplash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36310</guid>
		<description>Bacchus and Greta are onto something, I compared the post with other drawings (which were signed by ToF), and the tone does seem different. The reason I immediately jumped to the conclusion that I had initially reached, (besides the characteristic ToF-like use of boots and leather &quot;Dutch Boy&quot; or Fiddler&#039;s cap) could be summed up by this Wikipedia article that describes ToF&#039;s homoerotic characters as: &quot;...men with exaggerated primary and secondary sex traits: heavily muscled torsos, limbs, and buttocks, and improbably large penises. Tight or partially removed clothing showed off these traits, with penises often visible as distinct bulges in tight trousers or prominently displayed for the viewer. His drawings frequently feature two or more men either immediately preceding or during explicit sexual activity.&quot;
Besides, this appears to be a pen and ink drawing, whereas pencil seems to be &quot;Tom&#039;s&quot; implement of choice.
However, in the same article, I did notice this quote: &quot;There is considerable argument over whether his depiction of &#039;supermen&#039; (male characters with huge sexual organs and muscles) is facile and distasteful, or whether there is a deeper complexity in the work which plays with and subverts those stereotypes. For example, some critics have noted examples of apparent tenderness between traditionally tough, masculine characters, or playful smiles in sado-masochistic scenes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bacchus and Greta are onto something, I compared the post with other drawings (which were signed by ToF), and the tone does seem different. The reason I immediately jumped to the conclusion that I had initially reached, (besides the characteristic ToF-like use of boots and leather &#8220;Dutch Boy&#8221; or Fiddler&#8217;s cap) could be summed up by this Wikipedia article that describes ToF&#8217;s homoerotic characters as: &#8220;&#8230;men with exaggerated primary and secondary sex traits: heavily muscled torsos, limbs, and buttocks, and improbably large penises. Tight or partially removed clothing showed off these traits, with penises often visible as distinct bulges in tight trousers or prominently displayed for the viewer. His drawings frequently feature two or more men either immediately preceding or during explicit sexual activity.&#8221;<br />
Besides, this appears to be a pen and ink drawing, whereas pencil seems to be &#8220;Tom&#8217;s&#8221; implement of choice.<br />
However, in the same article, I did notice this quote: &#8220;There is considerable argument over whether his depiction of &#8216;supermen&#8217; (male characters with huge sexual organs and muscles) is facile and distasteful, or whether there is a deeper complexity in the work which plays with and subverts those stereotypes. For example, some critics have noted examples of apparent tenderness between traditionally tough, masculine characters, or playful smiles in sado-masochistic scenes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36264</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36264</guid>
		<description>Yikes. I wouldn&#039;t mess with those guys. 

Another artist in this style who is completely unlike anything I have ever seen is &quot;Franco&quot; (sadly, he does not do M/F..just M/M.)...

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes. I wouldn&#8217;t mess with those guys. </p>
<p>Another artist in this style who is completely unlike anything I have ever seen is &#8220;Franco&#8221; (sadly, he does not do M/F..just M/M.)&#8230;</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greta Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36259</link>
		<dc:creator>Greta Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36259</guid>
		<description>I would also guess that it&#039;s not Tom of Finland. The drawing style is softer, for one thing. And -- how shall I put this? -- Tom of Finland didn&#039;t exactly have the knack of capturing the gleam of intelligence in a person&#039;s eye. In other words, his characters all look as dumb as rocks. (I&#039;m actually not crazy about T of F for exactly that reason.) And that&#039;s not true for this picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also guess that it&#8217;s not Tom of Finland. The drawing style is softer, for one thing. And &#8212; how shall I put this? &#8212; Tom of Finland didn&#8217;t exactly have the knack of capturing the gleam of intelligence in a person&#8217;s eye. In other words, his characters all look as dumb as rocks. (I&#8217;m actually not crazy about T of F for exactly that reason.) And that&#8217;s not true for this picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36247</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36247</guid>
		<description>Greta, I don&#039;t know who the artist is, but Whiplash, I&#039;m real sure it&#039;s not Tom of Finland.  Style is all wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greta, I don&#8217;t know who the artist is, but Whiplash, I&#8217;m real sure it&#8217;s not Tom of Finland.  Style is all wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Whiplash</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36246</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Whiplash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36246</guid>
		<description>I would venture to say &quot;Tom of Finland&quot; is the artist. Anyone second the motion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would venture to say &#8220;Tom of Finland&#8221; is the artist. Anyone second the motion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitchy Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36238</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitchy Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2007/07/23/bondage-whipping/#comment-36238</guid>
		<description>Guh!

I love art.

(Sorry this comment is so lame - most of my brain is busy.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guh!</p>
<p>I love art.</p>
<p>(Sorry this comment is so lame &#8211; most of my brain is busy.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

