Your G-Spot Has NOT Gone Missing
I knew at an intuitive level that there was something lame and false about the recent “scientific” news from Italy, where researchers supposedly determined that some women don’t have G-spots. I said nothing, counting on the fact that Violet Blue, author of The Smart Girl’s Guide to the G-Spot, would be along eventually to set things straight. Which she now has done. It turns out, the Italian dudes were a bit confused, and were using what Violet calls the “two-hands-and-a-flashlight” research method:
News flash to news outlets: The vagina ceased to be a mystery at least 40 years ago. The G-spot is a real, tangible thing, and you can even see it if you have a bio-vagina, or know someone who will let you take a G-peep. It is a real place inside the body, and you don’t need ultrasound to find it. And again, I’ll contradict the reporting and say that yes, some women find it to be incredible for orgasms, while others don’t like the sensation so much. It isn’t a “magic button” for all girls: But that in no way means a woman cannot have, enjoy, or break windows all the way down to Twin Peaks and back screaming in joy from vaginal orgasms.
Myths about the G-spot you’re seeing in these mainstream news sources:
* Not every woman has one.
* Every woman likes G-spot stimulation.
* There’s a test to find it, and only one “right” way to touch it.
* Touching it will make you incontinent, and female ejaculation is urine. (It is not.)
* Any other orgasms are inferior to a G-spot orgasm.
If you’re squeamish about female anatomy, skip the next two paragraphs, but if you want to know what the hell a G-spot is or why anyone wants to find one, read on…
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=2195
Miss Blue shoulda posted some photos , with arrows pointing,
circles circling . I suppose illustrations are out of the
question.
Dude, she wrote a whole book! Buy that, and Bob’s yer uncle.
Violet always has the info!
I’m a little late to this discussion but I hadn’t read ErosBlog in a long time. It seems obvious to me, maybe I missed something in the study, but isn’t it possible that women with bigger G-spots are just more sensitive, with them possibly having more nerve endings, easier to find, so on? For some the reason, the researches chose to say some women just have no G-spot but couldn’t it just be that they have smaller ones (since they based it on measuring the area or whatever) and are therefore harder to stimulate? It seemed like Violet Blue got awful angry without considering that maybe G-spot size (or density or whatever you would call the difference between the women tested) is a possible factor in having vaginal orgasms. The researchers were just dumb to announce that some women just have no G-spot but that doesn’t necessarily mean the whole study was dumb, maybe.
Shanno, I don’t think she got angry so much as contemptuous. The existence of the G spot as a part of normal female anatomy is settled science, and so “researchers” who routinely couldn’t find it have seriously undermined their own credibility.
Would we trust a geographer who announced that the capitol cities of twenty one states could not be found when he was making his maps? I mean, would we trust him about anything?