<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your G-Spot Has NOT Gone Missing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 00:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-64378</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-64378</guid>
		<description>Shanno, I don't think she got angry so much as contemptuous.    The existence of the G spot as a part of normal female anatomy is settled science, and so "researchers" who routinely couldn't find it have seriously undermined their own credibility.  

Would we trust a geographer who announced that the capitol cities of twenty one states could not be found when he was making his maps?  I mean, would we trust him about &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shanno, I don&#8217;t think she got angry so much as contemptuous.    The existence of the G spot as a part of normal female anatomy is settled science, and so &#8220;researchers&#8221; who routinely couldn&#8217;t find it have seriously undermined their own credibility.  </p>
<p>Would we trust a geographer who announced that the capitol cities of twenty one states could not be found when he was making his maps?  I mean, would we trust him about <i>anything</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanno</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-64363</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 01:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-64363</guid>
		<description>I'm a little late to this discussion but I hadn't read ErosBlog in a long time.  It seems obvious to me, maybe I missed something in the study, but isn't it possible that women with bigger G-spots are just more sensitive, with them possibly having more nerve endings, easier to find, so on?  For some the reason, the researches chose to say some women just have no G-spot but couldn't it just be that they have smaller ones (since they based it on measuring the area or whatever) and are therefore harder to stimulate? It seemed like Violet Blue got awful angry without considering that maybe G-spot size (or density or whatever you would call the difference between the women tested) is a possible factor in having vaginal orgasms.  The researchers were just dumb to announce that some women just have no G-spot but that doesn't necessarily mean the whole study was dumb, maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little late to this discussion but I hadn&#8217;t read ErosBlog in a long time.  It seems obvious to me, maybe I missed something in the study, but isn&#8217;t it possible that women with bigger G-spots are just more sensitive, with them possibly having more nerve endings, easier to find, so on?  For some the reason, the researches chose to say some women just have no G-spot but couldn&#8217;t it just be that they have smaller ones (since they based it on measuring the area or whatever) and are therefore harder to stimulate? It seemed like Violet Blue got awful angry without considering that maybe G-spot size (or density or whatever you would call the difference between the women tested) is a possible factor in having vaginal orgasms.  The researchers were just dumb to announce that some women just have no G-spot but that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean the whole study was dumb, maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-60826</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-60826</guid>
		<description>Violet always has the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Violet always has the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-60823</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-60823</guid>
		<description>Dude, she wrote a whole book!  Buy that, and Bob's yer uncle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, she wrote a whole book!  Buy that, and Bob&#8217;s yer uncle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodeo</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-60807</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/03/05/your-g-spot-has-not-gone-missing/#comment-60807</guid>
		<description>Miss Blue shoulda posted some photos , with arrows pointing,
circles circling .  I suppose illustrations are out of the
question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Blue shoulda posted some photos , with arrows pointing,<br />
circles circling .  I suppose illustrations are out of the<br />
question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
