<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh Noes, Da Man Junk!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 00:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Beautiful Kind</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-93278</link>
		<dc:creator>The Beautiful Kind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-93278</guid>
		<description>The only thing wrong with this pic is that four people are wearing clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing wrong with this pic is that four people are wearing clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-93112</link>
		<dc:creator>bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-93112</guid>
		<description>Whiplash, I've got nothing at all against speculation.  What frosts my Wheaties is people presenting their speculation as certain fact, as an aggressive rhetorical device.  

Thanks for not doing that.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whiplash, I&#8217;ve got nothing at all against speculation.  What frosts my Wheaties is people presenting their speculation as certain fact, as an aggressive rhetorical device.  </p>
<p>Thanks for not doing that.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Whiplash</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-93047</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Whiplash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-93047</guid>
		<description>I know how Bacchus hates speculation, but being as everyone else is doing it, I thought I would weigh in with my own thoughts (so that centuries from now, when scholars are studying the early days of the internet and the history of sexuality...)

Starting somewhere in the early nineties, probably with the advent of the commercially available digital camera, people (mostly young gen-Xers), started to take naughty pictures that weren't for porn reproduction, but more as personal inside jokes. A co-worker would ask the boss or another co-worker to pose for a snapshot while yet another co-worker would secretly pose in the background with his cock out of his pants, or flashing her tits, or mooning, whereas in the past, most people were a bit inhibited about having such photos developed at the local pharmacy.

This trend seemed to quickly morph into taking snapshots of friends, wives, husbands, etc. posed in various sexual positions with statues of people or animals, often to be shared over the internet.

Beach photos, such as the one depicted above, are yet another development that has gotten even more popular with the advent of the photo cell phone.

When done "right" (or for maximum effect), the object is to have the subject in the foreground appearing as serious as possible, if not actually oblivious. 

It's along the lines of pranks like being rick-rolled, duckrolled, or flash-mobbing, or "stealing" someone's pink flamingo lawn ornament and mailing or e-mailing them a photo of it enjoying a vacation on the beach. 

In this case, even though in the photo itself the figure may seem minimal, it's rather difficult to beleive that a group of people on the beach, who were themselves fully dressed, would not be aware of a totally naked sunbather literally a stone's throw away from them, or that the photographer would not have been fully aware. The one thing that is heavier into the realm of doubt in this instance, is whether or not the "nudist" himself was actually a knowing accomplice or the oblivious subject of the prank.

Downloading some stranger's photo (like the one above), onto your computer or cell phone and sending it to a friend along with a text message along the lines of "Guess where I am! I'm at the beach with four or my friends...", is yet another level of "rickrolling".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know how Bacchus hates speculation, but being as everyone else is doing it, I thought I would weigh in with my own thoughts (so that centuries from now, when scholars are studying the early days of the internet and the history of sexuality&#8230;)</p>
<p>Starting somewhere in the early nineties, probably with the advent of the commercially available digital camera, people (mostly young gen-Xers), started to take naughty pictures that weren&#8217;t for porn reproduction, but more as personal inside jokes. A co-worker would ask the boss or another co-worker to pose for a snapshot while yet another co-worker would secretly pose in the background with his cock out of his pants, or flashing her tits, or mooning, whereas in the past, most people were a bit inhibited about having such photos developed at the local pharmacy.</p>
<p>This trend seemed to quickly morph into taking snapshots of friends, wives, husbands, etc. posed in various sexual positions with statues of people or animals, often to be shared over the internet.</p>
<p>Beach photos, such as the one depicted above, are yet another development that has gotten even more popular with the advent of the photo cell phone.</p>
<p>When done &#8220;right&#8221; (or for maximum effect), the object is to have the subject in the foreground appearing as serious as possible, if not actually oblivious. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s along the lines of pranks like being rick-rolled, duckrolled, or flash-mobbing, or &#8220;stealing&#8221; someone&#8217;s pink flamingo lawn ornament and mailing or e-mailing them a photo of it enjoying a vacation on the beach. </p>
<p>In this case, even though in the photo itself the figure may seem minimal, it&#8217;s rather difficult to beleive that a group of people on the beach, who were themselves fully dressed, would not be aware of a totally naked sunbather literally a stone&#8217;s throw away from them, or that the photographer would not have been fully aware. The one thing that is heavier into the realm of doubt in this instance, is whether or not the &#8220;nudist&#8221; himself was actually a knowing accomplice or the oblivious subject of the prank.</p>
<p>Downloading some stranger&#8217;s photo (like the one above), onto your computer or cell phone and sending it to a friend along with a text message along the lines of &#8220;Guess where I am! I&#8217;m at the beach with four or my friends&#8230;&#8221;, is yet another level of &#8220;rickrolling&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitsquana</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92789</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitsquana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92789</guid>
		<description>i always thought of "junk" as a heroin euphemism... and i really can't see the connection between heroin and penis, unless its something about injecting fluid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i always thought of &#8220;junk&#8221; as a heroin euphemism&#8230; and i really can&#8217;t see the connection between heroin and penis, unless its something about injecting fluid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aphrodite</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92752</link>
		<dc:creator>Aphrodite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92752</guid>
		<description>Tom, I hate that phrase too and this will probably be the only time I ever use it.

Everybody that's claiming the picture is on purpose, unless you have proof, let's not go there. I've seen big grins like that for other reasons, and yeah, I don't know that it was an accident either. I'll fix that part.

Bacchus, the comments on your post notwithstanding, I'm a gal that's never enjoyed the cold clinical feel of a speculum, so anything was better than having that drawing at the top of the page. :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I hate that phrase too and this will probably be the only time I ever use it.</p>
<p>Everybody that&#8217;s claiming the picture is on purpose, unless you have proof, let&#8217;s not go there. I&#8217;ve seen big grins like that for other reasons, and yeah, I don&#8217;t know that it was an accident either. I&#8217;ll fix that part.</p>
<p>Bacchus, the comments on your post notwithstanding, I&#8217;m a gal that&#8217;s never enjoyed the cold clinical feel of a speculum, so anything was better than having that drawing at the top of the page. :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92715</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92715</guid>
		<description>Last spring in Shanghai I caught something in the background just before I snapped the shot:  A father holding up her little daughter to let her pee in a pond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last spring in Shanghai I caught something in the background just before I snapped the shot:  A father holding up her little daughter to let her pee in a pond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACorruptMind</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92701</link>
		<dc:creator>ACorruptMind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92701</guid>
		<description>Well now, that is kinda random. But it is the internet. I have seen entire web sites devoted to the random "junk flash" if you get my meaning. 

Different strokes and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well now, that is kinda random. But it is the internet. I have seen entire web sites devoted to the random &#8220;junk flash&#8221; if you get my meaning. </p>
<p>Different strokes and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92606</link>
		<dc:creator>bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92606</guid>
		<description>Icky?  You show me floppy sunburned man junk and then speak to me of &lt;i&gt;icky&lt;/i&gt;?  The nerve!

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Icky?  You show me floppy sunburned man junk and then speak to me of <i>icky</i>?  The nerve!</p>
<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkneuro</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92597</link>
		<dc:creator>darkneuro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92597</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I think the photographer KNEW it was in the shot. But that's me. And yeah.... that qualifies as 'man junk'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I think the photographer KNEW it was in the shot. But that&#8217;s me. And yeah&#8230;. that qualifies as &#8216;man junk&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92576</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/2008/08/26/oh-noes-da-man-junk/#comment-92576</guid>
		<description>JUNK??  Where the hell did that ever come from?  You kids got it all fucked up.  Don't ya be calling my family jewels junk, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JUNK??  Where the hell did that ever come from?  You kids got it all fucked up.  Don&#8217;t ya be calling my family jewels junk, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
