Comments on: She Walks All Over Him

By: Old Queer

Old Queer — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:44:56 +0000

Looks like she’s going to give him a good working over with her fingernails too. Young girls love to rake and claw with their nails as they pinch your face with their toes. She just wants to see what he has, and when he shoots his load, she’ll make him lick it up.

By: LadyG

LadyG — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:39:19 +0000

Bacchus is of course correct that there is no “real” answer as to whether ink is a woman or a girl, but it’s still fun & interesting to try to guess what the artist intended to represent (to which there is perhaps a “real” answer in that the artist had thoughts of what he was doing, but we’ll never now for sure). Was it intended to be innocent? and was it innocent by contemporary standards (though we might raise an eyebrow)? or Was s/he deliberately ambiguous about the female’s age or the platonic/sensual nature of the picture? Perhaps a bored artist completing a job lazily, or subversively.

Personally, I’d guess she’s meant to be a child (judging by the smaller frame, the housecoat looks borrowed from mom, it says “Pops,” and her child-like bow). I also doubt it’s meant to be sexual, but more along the lines of a daughter rough-housing with her dad.

By: Bacchus

Bacchus — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:47:25 +0000

Look, you guys do realize you’re arguing about the family relationships between one bit of ink and another bit of ink, right? Art interpretation is all well and good, but it helps to keep in mind that there’s no “real” answer.

By: D

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:06:34 +0000

But did they intend for him to be getting an upskirt? Sometimes the 50s advertising contains really obviously inappropriate material and no one seemed to notice at the time because, well, here it is anyway.

That said, why is Pop’s right underarm bleeding?

By: Di

Di — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:17:54 +0000

I thought it was his wife until I saw the caption too. Then I looked at the pic again and realized how much smaller and younger she looks. I’m going with the people who say daughter.

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:05:11 +0000

The daughter hypothesis is presumably less likely since he’s shown getting a good solid upskirt.

By: Bacchus

Bacchus — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:27:19 +0000

Jodie, you could be right. But the housecoat she’s wearing is something I associate with suburban women of that era, I’ve never seen any hint that they were worn by younger people.