<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porn And Literature In The Twenty-First Century</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: holmes_iv</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comment-112238</link>
		<dc:creator>holmes_iv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=3617#comment-112238</guid>
		<description>Wow! I like Bruce Sterling. Sure wish I could understand what the fuck he&#039;s talking about!
I agree that newspapers are a dead media. I work for one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I like Bruce Sterling. Sure wish I could understand what the fuck he&#8217;s talking about!<br />
I agree that newspapers are a dead media. I work for one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.B.</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comment-111726</link>
		<dc:creator>H.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=3617#comment-111726</guid>
		<description>Rodeo: Yeah, though I wonder if that&#039;s as much a signal-to-noise issue as anything else -- if there was as much now as there was then, would we find it among the vast firehose of the commercial stuff?

With that said, there&#039;s a particular bit of porn from the early days of the web -- 1993 or 1994 -- that I miss.  What I recall from my furtive looks in an empty high-school computer lab (listening carefully for footsteps down the hall) was a small website with one photo page with three black-and-white photos, probably 320x200 or so, of a relatively young woman.  I remember vaguely what her face looked like (long, dark hair), and I&#039;m pretty sure that the first photo was of her naked and reclining, taken from between her legs.  The last photo was a closeup of her vagina with a dollop of cum glistening in it.

The whole idea of it fascinated me.  The idea, first of all, that someone &lt;i&gt;in real life&lt;/i&gt; might have sex with someone she wasn&#039;t married to, with her husband watching and taking photographs.  And that she might then post them on the internet for everyone to see.  I&#039;d had a fairly sheltered upbringing, and even though I had a vivid imagination, the idea that people might really do that, just because they wanted to, was amazing.

I really wish I could find a copy of the page, to see it again and see what it would look like now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodeo: Yeah, though I wonder if that&#8217;s as much a signal-to-noise issue as anything else &#8212; if there was as much now as there was then, would we find it among the vast firehose of the commercial stuff?</p>
<p>With that said, there&#8217;s a particular bit of porn from the early days of the web &#8212; 1993 or 1994 &#8212; that I miss.  What I recall from my furtive looks in an empty high-school computer lab (listening carefully for footsteps down the hall) was a small website with one photo page with three black-and-white photos, probably 320&#215;200 or so, of a relatively young woman.  I remember vaguely what her face looked like (long, dark hair), and I&#8217;m pretty sure that the first photo was of her naked and reclining, taken from between her legs.  The last photo was a closeup of her vagina with a dollop of cum glistening in it.</p>
<p>The whole idea of it fascinated me.  The idea, first of all, that someone <i>in real life</i> might have sex with someone she wasn&#8217;t married to, with her husband watching and taking photographs.  And that she might then post them on the internet for everyone to see.  I&#8217;d had a fairly sheltered upbringing, and even though I had a vivid imagination, the idea that people might really do that, just because they wanted to, was amazing.</p>
<p>I really wish I could find a copy of the page, to see it again and see what it would look like now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly Ren</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comment-111720</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=3617#comment-111720</guid>
		<description>18. cracked me up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18. cracked me up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodeo</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comment-111704</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=3617#comment-111704</guid>
		<description>What I miss is the old home made porn when the web was in its infancy.
Now everything is  fake as it can get, no matter how it
is titled, generally speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I miss is the old home made porn when the web was in its infancy.<br />
Now everything is  fake as it can get, no matter how it<br />
is titled, generally speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

