<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porn And Literature In The Twenty-First Century</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: holmes_iv</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comment-112238</link>
		<dc:creator>holmes_iv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=3617#comment-112238</guid>
		<description>Wow! I like Bruce Sterling. Sure wish I could understand what the fuck he's talking about!
I agree that newspapers are a dead media. I work for one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I like Bruce Sterling. Sure wish I could understand what the fuck he&#8217;s talking about!<br />
I agree that newspapers are a dead media. I work for one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.B.</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comment-111726</link>
		<dc:creator>H.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=3617#comment-111726</guid>
		<description>Rodeo: Yeah, though I wonder if that's as much a signal-to-noise issue as anything else -- if there was as much now as there was then, would we find it among the vast firehose of the commercial stuff?

With that said, there's a particular bit of porn from the early days of the web -- 1993 or 1994 -- that I miss.  What I recall from my furtive looks in an empty high-school computer lab (listening carefully for footsteps down the hall) was a small website with one photo page with three black-and-white photos, probably 320x200 or so, of a relatively young woman.  I remember vaguely what her face looked like (long, dark hair), and I'm pretty sure that the first photo was of her naked and reclining, taken from between her legs.  The last photo was a closeup of her vagina with a dollop of cum glistening in it.

The whole idea of it fascinated me.  The idea, first of all, that someone &lt;i&gt;in real life&lt;/i&gt; might have sex with someone she wasn't married to, with her husband watching and taking photographs.  And that she might then post them on the internet for everyone to see.  I'd had a fairly sheltered upbringing, and even though I had a vivid imagination, the idea that people might really do that, just because they wanted to, was amazing.

I really wish I could find a copy of the page, to see it again and see what it would look like now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodeo: Yeah, though I wonder if that&#8217;s as much a signal-to-noise issue as anything else &#8212; if there was as much now as there was then, would we find it among the vast firehose of the commercial stuff?</p>
<p>With that said, there&#8217;s a particular bit of porn from the early days of the web &#8212; 1993 or 1994 &#8212; that I miss.  What I recall from my furtive looks in an empty high-school computer lab (listening carefully for footsteps down the hall) was a small website with one photo page with three black-and-white photos, probably 320&#215;200 or so, of a relatively young woman.  I remember vaguely what her face looked like (long, dark hair), and I&#8217;m pretty sure that the first photo was of her naked and reclining, taken from between her legs.  The last photo was a closeup of her vagina with a dollop of cum glistening in it.</p>
<p>The whole idea of it fascinated me.  The idea, first of all, that someone <i>in real life</i> might have sex with someone she wasn&#8217;t married to, with her husband watching and taking photographs.  And that she might then post them on the internet for everyone to see.  I&#8217;d had a fairly sheltered upbringing, and even though I had a vivid imagination, the idea that people might really do that, just because they wanted to, was amazing.</p>
<p>I really wish I could find a copy of the page, to see it again and see what it would look like now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly Ren</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comment-111720</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=3617#comment-111720</guid>
		<description>18. cracked me up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18. cracked me up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodeo</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/07/13/porn-and-literature-in-the-twenty-first-century/#comment-111704</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=3617#comment-111704</guid>
		<description>What I miss is the old home made porn when the web was in its infancy.
Now everything is  fake as it can get, no matter how it
is titled, generally speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I miss is the old home made porn when the web was in its infancy.<br />
Now everything is  fake as it can get, no matter how it<br />
is titled, generally speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
