<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3D Kink And Open Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erosblog.com/2009/10/30/3d-kink-and-open-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/10/30/3d-kink-and-open-standards/</link>
	<description>Sex Blogging, Gratuitous Nudity, Kinky Sex, Sundry Sensuality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchelle</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/10/30/3d-kink-and-open-standards/#comment-127547</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=4046#comment-127547</guid>
		<description>I actually agreed with james about 3d SEX Villa. Why can&#039;t they choose a name and stick to it? 

I&#039;m a programmer and not an artist by nature. And while I DO pay for artists for their time, 

there&#039;s an better alternative: 3ds max 2010 (the previous version I licensed was 3d Studios MAX 6: I didn&#039;t like it, but, Oh, max has come a LONG WAY). The Max 2010&#039;s  software environment is VERY robust. Also,   

!NET RENDER! get a few servers together, render overnight, and wake up to the beautiful art of your dream. 

note: SEX villa doesn&#039;t do it while you sleep, unlike max:)

If you are serious about seeing your artistic visions instantiated in reality, I&#039;d suggest you license 3ds max 2010  as I did (or 2011, but your favorite plugins are not fully supported yet).

Is worth every dollar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually agreed with james about 3d SEX Villa. Why can&#8217;t they choose a name and stick to it? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a programmer and not an artist by nature. And while I DO pay for artists for their time, </p>
<p>there&#8217;s an better alternative: 3ds max 2010 (the previous version I licensed was 3d Studios MAX 6: I didn&#8217;t like it, but, Oh, max has come a LONG WAY). The Max 2010&#8242;s  software environment is VERY robust. Also,   </p>
<p>!NET RENDER! get a few servers together, render overnight, and wake up to the beautiful art of your dream. </p>
<p>note: SEX villa doesn&#8217;t do it while you sleep, unlike max:)</p>
<p>If you are serious about seeing your artistic visions instantiated in reality, I&#8217;d suggest you license 3ds max 2010  as I did (or 2011, but your favorite plugins are not fully supported yet).</p>
<p>Is worth every dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/10/30/3d-kink-and-open-standards/#comment-113810</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=4046#comment-113810</guid>
		<description>James, I can&#039;t help with your disappointment but I can help with the arms.  I struggled with that exact same problem.   The user interface on the pose editor leaves a LOT to be desired.  Anyway, it turns out that if you translate the hands, the arms follow; the elbow rotates but does not translate, because it moves depending on where the shoulders (which move with the &quot;upper body&quot; translator) and the hands are.

My first try, I got a girl with her hands way up in the air.  But the second try, that time I was able to pose her arms/hands where I wanted.

3D Sex Villa must have been the best kept secret on the internet, because I never once heard of it or the ThriXXX engine until last month, nor saw a single screenshot or piece of user-generated art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I can&#8217;t help with your disappointment but I can help with the arms.  I struggled with that exact same problem.   The user interface on the pose editor leaves a LOT to be desired.  Anyway, it turns out that if you translate the hands, the arms follow; the elbow rotates but does not translate, because it moves depending on where the shoulders (which move with the &#8220;upper body&#8221; translator) and the hands are.</p>
<p>My first try, I got a girl with her hands way up in the air.  But the second try, that time I was able to pose her arms/hands where I wanted.</p>
<p>3D Sex Villa must have been the best kept secret on the internet, because I never once heard of it or the ThriXXX engine until last month, nor saw a single screenshot or piece of user-generated art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/10/30/3d-kink-and-open-standards/#comment-113806</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=4046#comment-113806</guid>
		<description>3D kink is major disappointment for me. It&#039;s almost indistinguishable from 3D Sex Villa (for me, the novelty of that wore off after about 2 hours 2 years ago). So basically a marketing drive has duped me into subscribing to a Sex Villa clone. And to access new features I have to go through dullness -- DULL DULL DULL -- swinging disembodied hands in and out repetitively just to earn the right to experience what I have just paid an inflated price for.
  The &quot;create your own poses&quot; function: there is no obvious arms function! Apparently, there is no way to alter the model&#039;s T-splayed arms!  Perhaps I have to &quot;earn&quot; the right to unsplay the arms? Either way, when someone of my intelligence (who has just sat through a tutorial) is left floundering and frustrated trying to achieve the basics, something is far wrong. In almost no time, I realized I just didn&#039;t care.
  The basics -- like dressing a girl up in an office outfit and slowly opening her legs in a sitting posture -- are unachievable. But for some reason, I can indulge in the fantasy of strange animal-like ears?!
  The &quot;direct your own movie&quot; line is clever marketing, but &quot;silent movie&quot; would be more accurate. A dialogue function seems blindingly obvious, but was apparently beyond the creators. A technology which has a shot at global significance has been developed by dreary minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D kink is major disappointment for me. It&#8217;s almost indistinguishable from 3D Sex Villa (for me, the novelty of that wore off after about 2 hours 2 years ago). So basically a marketing drive has duped me into subscribing to a Sex Villa clone. And to access new features I have to go through dullness &#8212; DULL DULL DULL &#8212; swinging disembodied hands in and out repetitively just to earn the right to experience what I have just paid an inflated price for.<br />
  The &#8220;create your own poses&#8221; function: there is no obvious arms function! Apparently, there is no way to alter the model&#8217;s T-splayed arms!  Perhaps I have to &#8220;earn&#8221; the right to unsplay the arms? Either way, when someone of my intelligence (who has just sat through a tutorial) is left floundering and frustrated trying to achieve the basics, something is far wrong. In almost no time, I realized I just didn&#8217;t care.<br />
  The basics &#8212; like dressing a girl up in an office outfit and slowly opening her legs in a sitting posture &#8212; are unachievable. But for some reason, I can indulge in the fantasy of strange animal-like ears?!<br />
  The &#8220;direct your own movie&#8221; line is clever marketing, but &#8220;silent movie&#8221; would be more accurate. A dialogue function seems blindingly obvious, but was apparently beyond the creators. A technology which has a shot at global significance has been developed by dreary minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/10/30/3d-kink-and-open-standards/#comment-113805</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=4046#comment-113805</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure about that, Josh.  The Gamerotica site restricts downloads to people who have subscriptions to a short list of thriXXX-powered games, not including 3D Kink and not including the Hustler-branded product, either.  So the user-generated content over there is not available to play with, whether or not it might be theoretically compatible.

Going the other way, as a ThriXXX licensee it would be *possible* for Kink.com to make content (like, say, fetish toys or poses, or even avatars of some of their popular models) available for the 3D Kink product exclusively.  Of course I can&#039;t say whether they plan to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about that, Josh.  The Gamerotica site restricts downloads to people who have subscriptions to a short list of thriXXX-powered games, not including 3D Kink and not including the Hustler-branded product, either.  So the user-generated content over there is not available to play with, whether or not it might be theoretically compatible.</p>
<p>Going the other way, as a ThriXXX licensee it would be *possible* for Kink.com to make content (like, say, fetish toys or poses, or even avatars of some of their popular models) available for the 3D Kink product exclusively.  Of course I can&#8217;t say whether they plan to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/10/30/3d-kink-and-open-standards/#comment-113802</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=4046#comment-113802</guid>
		<description>As another commenter said previously, this game is simply a re-branding of thriXXX&#039;s &quot;3d SexVilla 2&quot;... which has a vibrant community over at gamerotica dot com, including new poses.

Since appears a straight re-branding (although it seems perhaps lagging very slightly in updates?), I assume that all data is compatible between both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As another commenter said previously, this game is simply a re-branding of thriXXX&#8217;s &#8220;3d SexVilla 2&#8243;&#8230; which has a vibrant community over at gamerotica dot com, including new poses.</p>
<p>Since appears a straight re-branding (although it seems perhaps lagging very slightly in updates?), I assume that all data is compatible between both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.erosblog.com/2009/10/30/3d-kink-and-open-standards/#comment-113713</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erosblog.com/?p=4046#comment-113713</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a college graduate and have a good vocabulary, but I learned a new word today:  instantiation!  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a college graduate and have a good vocabulary, but I learned a new word today:  instantiation!  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

