Man In Chains
Lately, as I’m sure some of you have noticed, I’ve been giving in to my evil nature by posting pictures that are, if not designed to stir up trouble, at least likely to do so. (Like the man said, art is either plagiarism or revolution; me, I’m with the re-mixers, who are trying to prove it can be both at once.)
This picture of a man in chains, from Bondage Blog, is another one:
Some of my readers are going to enjoy, as Rope Guy puts it, “the very buff dude, in chains.” That’s all the reason I need to publish this picture.
I’m aware that some folks are likely to condemn any suggestion that we might find eroticism in a still photograph of an actor getting paid SAG scale for standing around sweating attractively in Hollywood during the production of a movie adaptation of a lurid fiction that, at least one one level, mocked long-dead racist bastards by suggesting that their women were fornicating lavishly with the buff guys they were trying so hard to oppress and exploit. Oh well, have fun with that.
But be nice about it, or I’ll move on to my ultimate weapon. Do you really want to see the cartoon drawing I’ve got of a sweet young lady making a mouthful (and what a mouthful!) of a horse’s cock? You’ll need Johnson’s Extra Strong Eye-and-Brain Soap after seeing that one!
Similar Sex Blogging:
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=1877
You know, I’m tempted to say something not nice, just to see if you make good on that threat.
;)
oooh sweet young lady sounds nice… lets have it…
and needing a bit of a brainwash afterward never stopped u before bacchus
Bacchus, I am a bit confused about your last comment. I have been reading Eros Blog for years, and you have always touted the fact that the environment here is sex positive. No matter how bizarre a picture may seem, it is never appropriate to make a negative comment about it.
Perhaps this is why I am confused when you use the phrase “eye and brain bleach” to describe a picture. It’s not that I am interested in seeing cartoon beastiality, but it seems like that comment goes against the sex positive nature of Eros Blog.
Not trying to troll, it’s just that I can’t recall you ever making a comment of this kind.
Hi, Lurking.
If you trawl through my archives, you’ll often find me giving warnings (akin to the comic threat in this case) about the risk of seeing images the readers might not want to see.
I’m generally eager to avoid condemning any particular sexual activity or hurting the feelings of the practitioners thereof. However, I don’t think it’s very likely there are any avid practitioners of horse cock sucking reading this blog. (I’ve never actually encountered a credible tale of anyone who does this for sexual gratification.)
I could be wrong. But even if I am, I didn’t condemn the practice (nor would I) nor mock nor judge its practitioners. I just acknowledged (warned) that many of my readers might not enjoy seeing a fantasy image of it. And I tried to do that in a manifestly light-hearted way, without using any derogatory language that might unduly undermine my general policies.
“Do you really want to see the cartoon drawing I’ve got of a sweet young lady making a mouthful (and what a mouthful!) of a horse’s cock? ”
Hell, yes! :)
“However, I don’t think it’s very likely there are any avid practitioners of horse cock sucking reading this blog”
Umm….
Might I suggest there could at least be aspiring practitioners? Ones who might be reluctant (or warned against) admitting it?
nadi xx
Nadi, of course there could be. I’m making a statement about likelihood, not impossibility.
And even there, it’s certainly possible I’m wrong.
So how many requests would it take for you to post it? Should I start a petition?
nadi xx
ps. don’t worry, I AM kidding… about the petition…
Most ppl find eroticism in some movie, and/or magazines – and not really porn. I’m guessing someone sent you something that upset you to the point that you need to put discliamer’s up? Don’t threaten us with a good time!
So bring on your ultimate weapon, cuz like everyone else (and I thnk you did it on purpose) I’m curious now too!