Femdom Bondage Whipping
A reader who wishes to remain anonymous sent in the following bit of vintage femdom art, which is probably attributable to the artist “Jim” and to the second quarter of the 20th century. Since the ladies who frequent this blog are always clamoring for more dick, I figured some Saturday morning whippin’ and drippin’ would not be out of order.
The first thing that struck me about this drawing… no, scratch that.
After I got over the whole male panic thing (“aah, balls, don’t be showing me balls, and especially don’t be beating on THE BALLS!“), the first thing that struck me about this drawing was the cruelty of the foot bondage. That wall could be fourteen inches high and his posture wouldn’t be much different, not with cables cinched tight around his Achilles tendons to enforce the tippy-toed stance.
The second thing that struck me is that this is that it’s another area where the march of technology has marched onwards since the picture was drawn. Are you sadly deficient in dungeon space? Does your bedroom lack thirty extra square feet in which to erect a permanent five-foot wooden bulwark that’s bolted down with iron strapping? Well, you’re in luck! Because these days, there’s a handy portable equivalent called The Humbler. It’s a bulwark in a box — just snap it around the balls and behind the thighs and you’re in business. Complete with bonus electrodes for (shudder) double bonus fun.
At this point I’d normally be talking about the miracle of technology and how great it is that everything gets smaller over time. Unfortunately I’m still distracted by the faint voice in my head that’s still screaming “Aaiieee, not the BALLS!”
Similar Sex Blogging:
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=2037
Actually the first thing that struck me about that, was…
…surely a dude’s cock and balls can’t actually do that position, short of being completely detatched? Even with heavy Femdom assistance…
…at least unless he’s got an amazing rotatable about the y-axis upgrade for his equipment. That would enable the 180 twirl so the balls face the opposite way around from those of standard standard human males — at least I think *I’m* a standard human male down there, and that’s what mine would need — _before_ the pull back manouver.
…
Alternatively it’s actually another dude hiding all the way up bound guy’s ass, and she’s saying ‘stick it out for me baby! yeah!’.
Like at lot of, um, femdom “art” this does have that quality of just being kind of fucking surreal. Mind you, there’s often a saving grace and I like the marks and the wet and muscles in his calves and the way his fingers are curling around the wall.
*(Now a brief pause while I refrain from commenting on her Jesuschrist of an outfit)*
I also quite like ‘hearing’ Bacchus screaming “Aaiieee, not the BALLS!â€?. Heh.
Okay, I’ve now had a look at the Humbler thingy, and alas I’m sorry to say I think I have to give the nod to second quarter of the twentieth century femdon surrealist art, as being embedded helplessly bent through A FREAKIN’ WALL restrained by your ankles is just way hotter a bondage concept.
Technology not quite there yet.
And yes, I agree, really nice marks on the booty and thighs.
Skap, I think the photo with the humbler kind of answers your former anatomy question.
If you look at the dude in the humbler, you could grab his dick (and you gotta do it, because I ain’t volunteering) and pull it back, it would be under his balls just the way the dick in the artwork above is. Other than being outsized, I don’t think the dude in the artwork is equipped with backwards balls or anything special like that.
Bitchy, the things I’ll post to keep my readers happy, sometimes I astonish myself.
Unless you have REALLY low hanging balls, “The Humbler” would make the normal man necessarily remain in a bent-over-at-the-waist position (as the product description text implies), or unless he wanted to experience a LOT of pain caused by his own thighs squeezing his testicles, (or he didn’t care if they just popped off entirely!) I take it that this fellow in the link photo has such a pair of “low riders”, because he doesn’t appear to be severely bent… You’re more likely to see this sort penis-back-through-the-legs imagery in homo-erotic depictions, because it’s rarer that a woman knows just how far back the “equipment” can be safely bent, or at what phase of rigidity it must be to avoid damage.
I’m with SKapusniak on his second comment. The wall seems way hotter to me to. At least this particular wall, because it’s otherwise unnecessarily extra width effectively prevents the victim from seeing exactly who is doing what to him, in a way that is somehow also way hotter than that which a mere blindfold would afford. It reminds me for some reason of a glory hole. Even hotter might be an actual full wall, where victim and tormenter were in wholly separate rooms, where either or BOTH could remain anonymous at say a private party. A room full of female doms could tightly tie up his testicles with his shoelaces, then whip, slap, spank, poke, prod, plug, torment with vibrators, or even violate that helpless ass with an enema or milk his prostate with their strap-ons, and the poor guy would be so totally at their mercies, never knowing if one of them were his beautiful secretary or the homely lady next door, (or even perhaps the GUY across the street for that matter), all the while keeping the “unfortunate victim” at the point of orgasm through a bit of stroking (…and even be able to photograph or videotape his entire experience, to surprise him with later). Meanwhile on the other side of the wall he could forced to give cunnilingus, anilingus or perhaps even fellatio, or made to watch his wife, or girlfriend, having lusty sex with another woman (or man!).
I guess even a mere HALF-wall, AND a blindfold, would pretty well accomplish the same level of fear… The Humbler, as wickedly devious as it is, certainly would have it’s place as well, but just doesn’t seem like it would afford quite that psychological level of vulnerability.
How did that guy get through the wall? It doesn’t look like it has a hinged top like stocks. And the hole doesn’t look big enough for him to get either way through. Maybe they just built the wall around him, although that seems like a lot of work.
Also, I think it’s interesting that his cruel foot bondage puts his feet in pretty much the same position as her shoes do to her. Although she presumably chose to put those on.
It’s possible that I’m focusing on the wrong stuff.
Note to lithquil: Although I would chalk up the design to “artistic license”, one fairly simple way that it could be accomplished as drawn, would be if it were made in two halves, that join vertically in the middle, with one or two full width horizontal straps of steel on the blind side. It would only require the hand-insertion of a single pin into a hole drilled in just one of the straps (and into the wood of one half) to lock them together, as long as the straps were well-fixed to the other (undrilled/pinless) half.
Any local custom cabinetmaker could build one for you if you wanted it replicated (…though with a few minor changes it could be made to operate in a wholly different manner, as you have already speculated, perhaps improved a bit). As drawn, I suppose you would have to remove and replace some of the screws in those bottom “L” supports as well…
Gosh, fantasy art, people?
I’m imagining this conversation in another context:
“How did her breasts get so big? Just think, they must have sliced her boobs open and shoved bags of salt water in there, it probably took weeks to heal. And just imagine the bras a woman like that would have to buy? They’d have to be engineered by an aircraft company.”
So point (a) is, it’s art, the technology doesn’t need to be point-perfect functional. And point (b) is, mere impracticality doesn’t even slow us sex-monkey humans down.
Well, the first thought that came to mind was – Hell no. The second, racing quite quickly behind was, is that thing she’s wearing crotchless? Maybe it won’t be so bad to be him later – backwards nuts or not.
Yeah, I realize it’s not 100% realistic. But the artist actually included the little metal bracers at the bottom of the wall, so there must have been some thought given to concerns like “what keeps the wall from falling down?”
I feel that I must comment: DAMN HOT! Done now, Night.
His balls are backwords… OW