Teledildonics?!
Okay, so this an entirely predictable post. I’ve been waiting seven days to see what Gina Lynn would write on in her first Wired Magazine “Sex Drive” column. So after I gulped down enough coffee for my eyes and fingers to work moderately well, I fired up the ol’ browser and mosied over, to read about a new remote-controlled dildo that is seriously remotely controlled:
In other words, a man can be thrusting in Cleveland while a woman is penetrated in Seattle, and the cybersex experience gets one step closer to the holodeck.
Here’s a link to the entire interesting column. As someone who’s never had a need for sex toys (but that day is getting closer), this whole idea is weirdly kinky-cool.
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=1451



It’s not a bad article, but I don’t like the way she implies that she came up with the word “teledildonics”, since I doubt that’s true.
What??? Surely any number of nubile readers would happily be Aphrodite’s ever-pleasing sex toy?
Oh Justin, would that it were so … but where I live there are many more four-legged mammals than two-leggers around. Not much potential sex-toy material to work with.
But I’m still hoping to find someone to enjoy my newly-painted bedroom with me.
sounds like the parody on cucme (See you see me) called fufme. It was some sort of machine where the guy humped a hole and the women got humped on by another machine via the net somewhere else. They just used bad 3D images, but it got the point accross.
>As someone who’s never had a need for sex toys
“need” is such a relative word….