February 3rd, 2005 -- by Aphrodite
Proof That Men Aren’t Immune To The Siren Song of Silicone
Bacchus has offered lots of evidence supporting his preference for natural breasts. The last was a sad photo of a pretty woman with an awful boob job. Via Daze Reader I learned that men are, er, plumping their penises with silicone too. The awful photographic evidence is hidden behind this link. What kind of guy would prefer psychological sexual stimulation to getting a blow job, or actual sex? Don’t answer that, on second thought, I don’t want to know.
Now, to soothe your tortured eyeballs, here’s something much better, from Fred at Good Shit:
And remember, people: silicone is for computers, not tits and dicks.
This entry was posted on Thursday, February 3rd, 2005 at 12:01 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response.
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=1312
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=1312
I prefer men, but it’s very artistic :-)
Several of those pix on siliconefreak look photoshopped to me.
But still, ick.
But thanks for that other pic. Makes me want to be a chain. B^)
I’ll definately agree with that chain statement…she is mm-mm good
I have to say, I have never seen anything quite as disgusting as those silicone injected testicles. I cannot believe some men would be happier with themselves that way. As a woman, I would be liable to vomit.
I. Am. Speechless.
Just–
Speechless.
(Good thing I can still type.)
to each his own and all… but those things look infected to me. and how does one walk with those things flopping all over the place?
Why thank you Aphrodite,:crazy: That link was indeed…hmmm, educational? In the sense that putting your hand on a red stove eye is educational. Or punching through a window to prove it’s just like in the movies is educational.
:D
You’re right, that picture DOES do a lot to soothe the soul afterwards.
Those guys have seriously unhealthy, fixated body images.. They are no different from anorexics!
:crazy: words can’t describe the thoughts in my head…but YUCK!
Silicone is for sex toys!
PS. those silicone penises look photoshopped to me. No man could wear pants comfortably with penises like that.
…holy crap on a stick…
This is indeed a distubing universe. :(
Actually that stuff computer chips are made of is silicon. No silicone in computers, it would probably leak out…
Personally I am very happy to see some pushback from the peculiar American fetish with BIG breasts/dicks. I will put it into words of one syllable, or less…big is NOT better.
Breasts look best in the B-cup range.
A for Adequate
B for Best
C for Surplus
D for Droop
As for those absurd dicks…there are only two things that are truly infinite, the universe and human stupdity.
Thanks, Geek, I did mean the element. Spelling isn’t my strongest skill, and sometimes spellcheckers aren’t much help.
I got curious enough to actually read his frequently asked questions… Yeesh… I have to say, there’s a reason why his doctor happens to live and work in Tijuana, MEXICO – it’s because the idea of doing it here would be completely and utterly thrown out of the doctors offices of even downtown L.A. The entire idea of injecting yourself with a completely foreign substance in order to physically increase size and supposedly enhance your body is really odd to me…
Thanks for soothing my eyes, though. I normally like a rounder girl, but it’s very pleasant after the nastiness on his site.
~M
There is something to be said for leaving perfectly nice breasts alone.
However, I must point out the pictures you post on here seem to be young women who have not gone through the rigors of life such as pregnancy, or surgeries.
My friends and I, all of us being 30 and older, have all had kids, and we all want a little “maintenance” done. My analogy is like the tires on your car, when they get flat, you pump them up.
In addition to pregnancies, I’ve had cysts removed. The wonderful fllu-bird colonel who performed my surgery years ago didn’t care about the scars or the scar tissue he left behind in both breasts.
My point is…not all women want plastic surgery purely to enhance size. Perhaps if breasts of older women were viewed as being as erotic as those of the young, we may not feel so ashamed of what our bodies have been put through.
Just looking at boths sides of the fence.
Ginnie
oh. my. god.
:cry:
OMG. I think I did not need to see those peniis.
Ginnie — I agree with you. If a woman’s breasts are saggy, mishapen, or otherwise deformed, then I do think that breast augmentation is worthwhile.
However, many women whose breasts are quite attractive naturally still opt for augmentation, often with results that are worse than the original. It is to this that I object. Bigger is often _not_ better.
personally I love a nice perky lil pair….store bought tits just aren’t user friendly in my opinion
:crazy:
Holy s***! There must be something wrong with these guys. Terribly wrong. Imagine someone like them running the 100 meters… They probably loose certain parts along the way! *yuck*
One thing that has been missed here.. and in most (if not all) discussions of breast augmentation is the fact that the nipples and areola are much less sensitive after the surgery… Who the heck wants a less responsive partner?
That has Long been a significant concern of mine. Is there any research on what causes the loss of sensation, the surgery itself, the implants, etc?
Justin, I’m pretty sure it’s because nerves are cut in the surgery and they heal very slowly, and sometimes never heal completely. So a decrease in sensation is pretty much guaranteed.
In reference to Aphrodite’s comment #25:
Not only are nerves cut, but even if they were to heal, if the wad of plastic is placed just below the skin (which it often is…), it now nearly blocks to all but the crudest of stimulations, the nerves that were located behind it.
“Boyish” breasts, have little or no tissue in them to begin with, to place between the skin and the silicon bag. Some of the nerves that are “lucky” enough to run along the surface of the skin may retain sensitivity, but those below are now muffled. To get an idea, try stacking an inch or so of potholders onto the back of one hand, and then try to stroke or tickle it with your other hand.
Sometimes the lump of silicone is placed partially BENEATH the muscle layer, which affords a bit more surface sensitivity, but can cause other undesirable problems or effects. Doctors may not encourage this placement as often as they should, being as it makes the surgery last longer.
Moving the nipple (to re-center it), often entails cutting all (or nearly all), of the nerves serving it, that run along the skin’s surface. Similarly, cutting a semi-circular incision at the edge of the areola (known as Periareolar Breast Augmentation), as a portal to stuff the bag in through, may leave a less noticeable scar, but can also interfere with any later attempts to breast feed.
Capillaries by the way, are also severed, which may or may not grow back, and if they do, they may be re-routed in a way that greatly lessens the nipple’s ability to erect as it did before.
Trans-Axillary Breast Augmentation means the incision is made under the arm, and not only must a pocket be cut to hold the bag, but an entire pathway to the site must be cut as well.