ErosBlog

The Sex Blog Of Record
 
 

No Bluenoses Needed In Hollywood (1950)

Thursday, September 23rd, 2021 -- by Bacchus

a bluenosed censor looms over hollywood

Liberality, of sorts, is far from a modern invention. It even existed between the pages of large-circulation popular magazines in the staid and conservative 1950s. Nonetheless, I was rather startled to discover this editorial, cheerfully and no doubt expensively illustrated by Harry Devlin, in the May 13, 1950 issue of Colliers. Their editorial Sniffing Out The Sin In The Cinema politely eviscerates, in about a dozen paragraphs, a dumbass proposal by some deservedly-forgotten United States Senator. To save you reading most of those, I’ll tell you that the blue-nosed asshole suggested requiring federal licenses for everybody in Hollywood, under the threat of ganking said licenses whenever their personal behavior failed to live up to unspecified federal morality standards. Collier’s editors were not keen:

Ever since Puritan days there have been periodic attempts to banish sin from our land by means of blue laws. The attempts have been uniformly unsuccessful, probably because it goes against the tough grain of American character to have some pious legislator define virtue and enforce it by statute. But successive failures haven’t discouraged the sanctimonious solons. They’re still at it.

Hollywood is already subjected to a lot of censorship and pressure, official and otherwise, which too frequently is reflected in the movies we see. We believe the threat of further censorship by Congress would simply lower the quality of Hollywood’s end product without improving the morals of the people who make the pictures or of the people who see them.

The only sensible and democratic censorship is individual discrimination. If you disapprove of the behavior of an actor or director or producer, you can stay away from his pictures. If enough people feel as you do and follow your example, the effect of your disapproval will be felt. Hollywood is very sensitive in the region of the box office. And it never fails to look for a remedy when that sensitive region is injured.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 

Shop Window Mannequin Porn

Tuesday, February 26th, 2019 -- by Bacchus

Shop window fetish fuel for a bluenosed sputtering retired British major

“It’s quite clearly obvious that they are utterly disgusting and must do in fact disgust any decent-minded people!” That’s how this tightly-wound retired British major opens his sputtering interview with an amused BBC reporter. He goes on to rail at length about the five or six shops that have mannequin porn “up against the glass” where “you can really not avoid them!”

I don’t know if anybody else in the seaside resort town of Eastbourne in East Sussex in 1959 was unduly aroused by shop window mannequins, but judging by the height of this major’s dudgeon, I think we can safely conclude that they were powerful fetish fuel for him. Projection much, major?

mannequin porn in the shop windows on Terminus Street, Eastbourne, East Sussex, UK, 1959

No, he’s very convinced the mannequin porn is a public menace: “I cannot believe that these displays are anything else but harmful.” And as always, the lurkers support him in email:

“I’ve had numerous letters and telephone messages from people, not only resident in Eastbourne, emphatically endorsing my action. I’m hoping that local opinion may ultimately put a stop to these unpleasant exhibitions and thereby remove a slur from the good name of this town.”

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 
cupid