November 17th, 2006 -- by Bacchus
Another Angle On The Nudist Women
Here’s another, perhaps better, angle on the pair of sun-worshipping nudist women shown below, the ones who look like mother and daughter to me. (Lots of commenters disagree.) Perhaps the different angle will shake loose some different opinions:
This entry was posted on Friday, November 17th, 2006 at 6:18 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response.
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=1798
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=1798
Matching shoes? I repectfully, calmly, cautiously think they’re models.
Mother-daughter nudists are not at all uncommon. I also personally know or several mother/daughters who enjoy shopping together, and buying some sort of matching clothing, as well as instances where when shopping alone, one would buy for the other because they’d run across a bargain or were trying to influence the other’s style, or where something was “just so cute” that they just “KNEW” the other would want one too. It is noteworthy that they are posing facing full sun. Normally most professional photographers will shoot so that the model doesn’t face harsh sun, and if it becomes necessary to do so, a professional model will refrain from squinting seconds before the shutter is to click. These ladies, very squinty, and without that cultured “come hither” look that models typically switch on…
I think they look a bit too close in age to be mother and daughter.
The body types of both women are very similar… the slight shoulders… the ‘mom’ is a bit thicker through the hips, indicative of a woman that’s been through childbirth. ‘Mom’ also sports a more controlled, sophisticated hair style. Like many women of previous generations, she probably had children early of age. I think it’s very probable these women are mother/daughter… for many years, my mother was thought to be my sister.
Have to agree on the age thing
in the first photograph the lady on the right appears much older that she does in this photograph
maybe it was the angle of the photograph, or the light, but in this photograph they both appear much closer in age, if not the same
irrespective, they are both very attractive and the photograph would appear too natural looking – the way they are standing and the placement of their hands – to say they could be models
Yes, no matter their age, they look fantastic.
Yet more fuel to the fire:
Black and white photography typically makes older women look younger than they are. That’s why agents will often have older actresses’ “8×10 glossies” done in that format. And in “vintage” photos, older hairstyles and makeup techniques make young women look much older. Anyone who has thumbed through their parents’ college yearbooks has noticed that. If the young lady’s father had a large nose, the daughter will often appear to have the nose of a middle aged woman on the body of a teenager. The photo may have been taken in Eastern Europe where there are cultural differences in visage or countenance that would confuse a Westerner’s normal cues. “…the Ukraine girls really knock me out, they leave the West behind.” (Lennon/McCartney -White Album)
well i like them both… there are people who get off on the mother daughter thing, but me, i think they are sisters… perhaps 5-10 years apart…
but seriously, beautiful nude women are a blessing… the body shape of a woman is a beautiful thing…
At this house, we beleive they are closely related, but are not mother and daughter. It’s the apparent ‘age thing’.
Once again we’ve gone all serious and clinical. Good Lord people, don’t be afraid to have a little fun!
Thanks, people, that’s exactly the sort of input I was looking for.
Er, Alex99? You just told nine people they weren’t having fun — why else would they post if they didn’t enjoy it? Seems a little rude to me, kinda like telling people they don’t know how to play right.
Why not make a “having a little fun” comment, rather than repeatedly griping at the way other people are having fun?
Well, personally, I think someone should argue they aren’t and see if that makes Bacchus post another picture of them. It worked last time…
I lean toward the mother-daughter myself….
Are they wearing matching shoes? Sorry, I pick out random things in photographs…
God Bacchus, why not have that stick removed? I’ve never seen a comments section with such a big soggy gray blanket of disapproval hanging over it. People are afraid to crack a joke. You take offense at EVERYTHING!
Alex99, I’m saddened to see you so wholly misunderstand the purpose of my moderating efforts.
In fact, I “take offense” at very little. I do, however, demand a high level of civility — something you might do well to work on, if you hope to see future comments make it out of moderation — and respect for others.
When it comes to adult sites on the internet that allow user participation, there seem to be only two alternatives: A toxic sewer that would make Beavis and Butthead proud, or heavy moderation. I’ve chosen door number two. I know it’s not for everyone, but I do my best.
Lots of folks like the result, but I know I can’t please everybody. That’s just the way it is. Fortunately for you, Alex, participation here is wholly optional.
I don’t think the intention was to convince anyone either way, I think we just got a second picture because opinions were so polarised by the last one. If I had a collection I’d probably just post my favourite.
Are you this blunt in real life? Do you dislike excessive typing? Good grief.
Anyway, having studied both pictures at length, I can state with confidence that they are second cousins thrice removed; they both like Marmite but neither is keen on anchovies. Oh, and don’t mention labradors to the lass on the left, it’ll only cause trouble.
You can tell from the poses… :-)
Still not believing that they are mother and daughter. BTW if you got more pics of them put them all in one post not making one post per pic. That’s irritating to me.
You have no idea of my level of civility. [Oh yes I do. It’s inadequate. — Bacchus]
This regards a 50-year-old cheeskake photo on an internet sex blog, not a fine-art nude in the Louvre. I guarantee the photographer and models were giving very little thought to lighting and contrast. I suggest that you stop taking yourself so seriously and enter at least somewhat into the spirit that the material intends. That goes as well for the rest of the [two insults to my readers deleted — Bacchus]. As for modding…. knock yourself out! [Since you make it necessary, sure. — Bacchus]
{quote}….participation here is wholly optional. {quote}
Indeed….bye!
yes, i agree with gem…….second cousins thrice removed but i’m not too sure about the marmite thing – more vegemite i reckon
and the one on the left appears to have been born in a shack at the top of a hill whose western slope ran down into a dam that had seventeen yabbies in it
Roloper, must be nice to be as perfect as you.
Happens I didn’t even know I had the second photo in this series. I discovered it on my hard drive after I’d posted the first. I promise I wasn’t saving it back for the purpose of irritating you.
And Gem is correct, I don’t have a dog in this fight. I see a potential family resemblance, and I wanted to see if others saw it also. Some do, some don’t, pretty much the normal result if you ask folks an opinion question about intangibles.
Maybe they are the same person?! (with trick photography and different hair and make-up) ooh freaky ;) No that can’t be right…
I’m so confused I cant remember who is the “mom” and who is the “daughter” in this anymore! No matter the photo is good.
Anyone know what the R-6 is for? a signature perhaps?
tucca and gem, you forgot the ovaltine!!!
that’s what keeps them so healthy looking.
Might be nonsense, but the pic immediately reminded me on another one, maybe just because of a certain attitude and hair style. If they are the same ladies then they are happy musicians. I´ve added it to the fluffy follies so you may judge for yourself.
http://fluffyfo....html
with fluffy greetz
Okay – this may be too assumptive;
The woman on the right looks only a little older, but her nipples indicate she hasn’t breastfed, which would be quite unusual for a mother of that time. Also, the ‘older’ woman has painted nails while the ‘younger’ girl doesn’t. Pretty unusual for that time, too. May I suggest if they are related, that they are in fact sisters? Explains the matching shoes – topical of sisters, actually. My call is that it isn’t a mum’n’daughter snap.