When showerbeerr tells men “you can absolutely get your girl to do a threesome with you if you just get a little bit more gay” it doesn’t come as a surprise to me at all. I see the TikTok/BookTok ladies talking about this all the time. When they read menage fiction, they want MMF, not MFM — and yes, the letter placement matters. They want “the boyfriends to be boyfriending” or there’ll be no joy in Mudville whatsoever.
I don’t think it’s a coincidence she critiques male erotic “literacy” specifically here:
You can absolutely get your girl to do a threesome with you. You just have to get a little bit more gay. That is the solution.
Because anytime I have a conversation with a man about this, I’m not loving the pitch. To be honest, I’m not impressed. They’re always like, would you be open to something like that? And I’m like, yes, let’s hear it, let’s hear the pitch.
And they get all excited, they’re like, okay, cool. So it has to be with another girl. That’s the only option. And I’m like, ah, like, it’s a little rigid. It’s a little rigid. Don’t you care about what my fantasy is? Cause it’s not necessarily that. I’m open to some other stuff.
And they. They’re like, what do you mean?
And I’m like, well, what about another guy? Two guys? And they look at me like I just asked them to punch their mom in the throat or something. Like I just said something so fucking crazy. And the truth is, like, I’m on some Challengers shit, and they’re on some fluorescently lit video on the homepage of a website they only visit in the incognito browser.
Shit, you know, like if men think that they are so adventurous, that they’re so erotically intelligent, really you’re just trying to recreate something that you’ve seen on the most depraved, exploitative alleyways of the internet. That’s not adventurous. Like, you are fucking vanilla. It’s literally vanilla.
And then, you know, we start talking about it more, and they’re like, okay, fine, fine, fine. We can do two guys. Fine. But I’m not kissing him, I’m not touching him, and I’m not kissing him.
What the fuck do you think this is? What do you think this is? Why would I want that? Why would I want a situation where you guys are not interacting? Seriously? Um, if you are vanilla, that’s totally fine. And most straight guys are. Just admit it. The only literacy you have in the subject is something you’ve seen in a really dark, exploitative fantasy that I don’t wanna recreate. I don’t wanna recreate videos that you’ve seen on the internet.
Right. It’s about being open. It’s about, like, letting the dynamic unfold. It’s about seeing what’s gonna happen and, like, rolling with the punches. And most straight guys just can’t do that. And that’s totally fine, but stay in your lane. Please don’t bring this to my desk ever again.
Probably I should take this moment to remind people that I quote things all the time here on ErosBlog without agreeing with every jot and tittle. Specifically in this case I don’t agree that common porn scenarios are exploitive in general or that (as this commentator implies) the uber-common man-with-two-women threesome-sandwich fantasy is exploitive in specific. But I do agree that it’s somewhat vanilla and boring, especially from a woman’s perspective. I’m not trying to police women’s fantasies when I say this, but I’d guess that at least eight out of ten times it’s fanservice for a man’s fantasy, not a woman’s. If you want to engage her erotic imagination, propose the sort of threesome she’s going to find erotic, duh…
Similar Sex Blogging:
