I’m with Petronius (almost). Love the photo, but it looks like it could easily be from the mid-90’s if not today. The “almost” is only because their head-hair looks combed to me, if slightly unkempt.
If it’s just the bush that says “hippie,” well, then, more hippie women, please, I’m not complainin’ (within reason, of course, I’ve seen some insanely untamed bushes in my time and, well, let’s just say you want to think about easy access to some extent…)
OH, how lovely…hairy women, hippie or not, they are the most marvellous human bean. I love them, here in Brazil it’s very difficult to find because all women go to the beaches and the cut this wonderful hair, infortunately. I would tlke to have a mistress all body unshaved. Thanks a lot fot showing this picture. I’ll dream to it.
It looks totally valid to me…as this is the era of porn I grew up with (i.e. it was images like this I first used for masturbation.) Early 70s porn was filled with wild and free hippie chicks who authentically believed that the world could become a better place if everyone would have sex with everyone else.
Reminds me of some of the pictures in the hippy birthing books. Aside from that, I am with Joseph – I don’t see the point in removing any bodily hair in most places. BDSM and a newborn-like pubic area seems to go hand in hand whenever you come across pictures, but I don’t think it has to be the case. My husband even things that heels, makeup, and shaved legs/pubic area looks plain stupid.
I tend to look at backgrounds and furnishings for clues to wether something is truly vintage. For instance, this one has a calendar on the wall… can’t read it, but that might be the tipoff. The colors and quality make it look like it might be scanned from an old magazine.
Oh, and as for certified hippies… you have to take a test, and they give you a card for your wallet…