6 Responses to “A Tricky Bit Of Nude Archery”

1. Irv O. Neil said (on February 8th, 2013 at 12:31 pm)

   She might lose a little bit of her hair too if she doesn’t adjust that bow!

2. Petronius said (on February 8th, 2013 at 5:18 pm)

   Ancient writers claim the Amazons cut off their left breast, to make for a better draw on their bow.

3. Justin said (on February 9th, 2013 at 7:30 am)

   Although don’t many users of classic (ie pre-composite) bows angle them to help steady the arrow, thus reducing the chance of hitting the body?

4. a fan of moral erotica said (on February 9th, 2013 at 9:04 am)

   Practitioners of modern sport archery will think that her form is all wrong. They draw to the cheek in front of their eye and hold the string, not the arrow.

   That is not the way it has always been done everywhere. The European long bow (think Agincourt, Crecey and Robin Hood)was drawn to the ear or the corner of the jaw. That is the way my son shoots his longbow. I’m certain that holding the arrow instead of the string was the style somewhere. My son would know. I’ll ask.

   She could slay a few French Knights!

5. Cubano said (on February 11th, 2013 at 6:44 pm)

   I’m a collegiate archer (was at least), and everything about that photo is just for art purposes (including the gigantically sized arrow). You do draw it across the chest, but modern archers wear mesh chest protectors, but that kinda ruin the image now wouldn’t it?

6. Dr. Whiplash said (on February 15th, 2013 at 3:36 am)

   Gee whiz you guys! She’s probably holding props made from a piece of packaging twine (real bowstring should be waxed, and not fuzzy), a yardstick, and a long-handled wooden spoon from the kitchen.

   …and yes, only a child with a suction-tipped toy set, would hold the arrow by the nock.

   I’m busy grooving on those luscious petite breasts, and those wisps of underarm hair…

Leave a Reply