Marilyn Monroe Stag Movie?
Here’s a first for ErosBlog, only a few years behind the times: an embedded flash movie, hosted on my own server so it won’t go away.
One of the big reasons I don’t usually embed YouTube videos and the like is that they have a terrible habit of not being there a year later. Link rot is bad enough, but blog posts with nothing to see are far far worse; we hates them, our precious, yesssss we does.
The occasion for this blessed event is the sharing of a stag video, said (as discussed in this post) by some to feature Marilyn Monroe. I’m quite skeptical, but not 100% convinced either way. No matter; old stag films are so much fun (did dildos really used to come packaged in boxes?) that it’s a worthy use of bandwidth anyway.
Thanks to commenter BJ for finding the movie for us.
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=2236
I’m no Marilyn expert, but i don’t think it really looks like her…
But it’s still a pretty fun movie to watch…
Don’t think it’s Marilyn. She would have been 22 in 1948, and at 22, she didn’t have a roll-able tummy. And she reportedly bleached to match.
I don’t think the face looks like hers, but I can’t be sure. Nice video though. But I don’t agree that having a rollable tummy has anything to do with why it’s not her. She looks the same size and approximate body shape. I know she got a little more luscious later on, but I don’t remember her ever being too skinny for a nice rollable tummy.
I don’t think its her, though I doubt anyone can be 100% on it.
I kind of hope it’s not.
I did laugh at the instructional video cutting of position. I could almost hear the voice over in my head;
“one of you gets on to all fours and places your head here *points*”
It made me chuckle, nice little video though.
I doubt very much that it’s MM, but it’s a neat movie. The post coital drink, smoke and kiss is a cool touch and is that guy skinny or what?! Not where it counts, tho.
I adore old footage like this. The way it looks (and sometimes when I get too caught up in my dreaming I have to remind myself that it only looks that way because of the film, not because life back then actually looked like that. and everytime, somehow, it makes me a little sad), the way the movement of the people in the picture is jerky and quick and the way the people themselves look and act.
Vintage erotica/pornography is probably my most favorite to see/hear/read about.
We have several MM prints and I doubt that this was her. My favourite part was her lingerie. I adore the vintage stuff. Thanks for posting.
sss
WHAT? No money shot? Awwww…..
For anyone who may be still following my original comment (in http://www.eros...ments), I’m fairly certain that THIS was also not the film which I once saw. Unfortunately, I can’t remember well enough to make much more of a comment, other than what I’ve already stated, but the film I hazily remember was zoomed in tighter on her head, and I seem to remember overexposure (in terms of light) being the norm, but most importantly, this film posted here is entirely foreign to me. For the record, in my opinion, this movie is not Marilyn (or Norma Jeane Mortenson). I can’t say that the one that I saw was Marilyn either, because I really wasn’t particularly familiar with her at the time, but now I’m just a bit of a long-time fan, and I think I know a fair amount of her different looks (in and out of heavy make-up) from her mid-teens to her death.
Looks like he fell through the Sock gap. :)
If you go to IMDB and look at some early photos of hers it could be her, but I don’t know.
It looks a lot like her but JFK looks terrible.
In couple of shots, there is a resemblance to MM, but I don’t think it’s her. It’s interesting to see what stag films were like back then though.
LMAO.
Awesome.
I can’t believe that guy kept his socks on.
The Dice brought me here. I have to say something, as it would be impolite not to notice, that eight years later the embeded video mentioned is now gone. Although, that probably has more to do with server lifespan, and the death of flash than anything else.
It actually looks like it was a matter of the streaming embed plugin I was using having been obsoleted some years ago by the WordPress upgrade treadmill and forcibly deactivated. But the source file is still there. I tweaked the html so that — if you have a view that can display .flv files — you can download the file and view it locally.