The Freedom To Be Naked
Although ErosBlog does not cover politics very much at all, I’ve long seen this sex blogging project as being my little contribution to a vital culture war. Because we are very sexual monkeys, control over sexual expression is one of the most important tools in the arsenal of the orcs who seek to govern and enslave us. (“Govern and enslave? Sorry, I repeat myself.”)
Daze and others have amply covered the case of Melissa Lincoln, the Nebraska lady who likes to get naked in public and enjoys making a buck when she does it. She’s been charged with public nudity, and faces actual jail time for it (although doubtless she’ll be offered a nice plea bargain that requires her to promise she’ll keep her pretty naked assets securely wrapped). After all, the point is to control sexual expression, remember? This isn’t about Melissa, it’s about reminding everyone that the orcs are watching and they will come for you if you don’t follow their rules.
Except that Melissa wants to fight. The liberty activists at the Liberty Round Table have been in touch with her, and it turns out that she doesn’t plan to knuckle under. She wants to fight this “all the way” and she doesn’t intend to plea bargain.
That’s a big ouchie, folks. A basic misdemeanor criminal defense starts at five grand, and that price assumes you’ll take any decent plea bargain. Appeals often cost thirty grand apiece, and you can need several.
The Knights of Nonaggression over at the Liberty Round Table have a list of what you can do to help, but the most obvious thing you can do is throw money. In Melissa’s case, the easiest way you can do that is to buy a membership at her web site. Sure, it’s commercial, but this is no “help me buy some fake boobs” bogus plea; the lady really does face jail time if she stands up for basic freedoms here. She will be under tremendous pressures to take a plea. As the LRT puts it:
For our part, we are not exhibitionists, but do believe that anything that de-mystifies sex, shows that good clean fun and healthy bodies are not ‘dirty’, is a very positive thing. There’s no end to the flood of misery produced by people’s twisted ideas about sex, love, and the human body, so we say: ‘Hurray for Melissa’s one woman war against benighted puritan attitudes!’ That Melissa’s site has a commercial side makes her work no less valuable — have not libertarians and objectivists always said that freedom is so valuable that there ought to be a way to promote it at a profit? We agree with Melissa; she has nothing to be ashamed of, not her body, not her pictures, not her profit.
…
It seems to me that there is no better way to show appreciation for an artist than to pay for her work; it has a better, cleaner feel than straight charity and allows her to be able to give some value in return for the help.
Indeed. And thanks to Don and Sunni at the Liberty Round Table for getting in touch with Melissa and publicizing her will to fight!
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=701
Thanks Bacchus!
DLT
If it cool for her to go nude in public then is it also ok for her to fuck in public? Oh, she makes money doing this stuff so that is a commerical enterprise and one ought not intefere with commerce.
I wonder if this would be so “important” if she were fat, or not as pretty.
Of course not. So I’ll just say this:
She broke the law. She should suffer the consequences.
It doesn’t have to do with interfering in commerce (although the gov does enough of that, and ought to stop) — as I understand it, she wasn’t caught in the act; they’re using the pictures on her web site to charge her. That should be pretty chilling to most folks who visit this site and who have similar sites.
AFA breaking the law, Shasta, you mean to tell me you never break any law? Including the thousands you probably don’t even know about? It’s the principle, not her appearance, that’s important to us.
Leaving aside the legality of her actions, she should have sought the permission of the club owner before doing what she did. She did this on private property, not out on the street or in a park (both “public” property) & the property owner should have had a say in the matter.
But, I agree that what she did should *not* be illegal.