The Holy Handkerchief Of Cum-Saving
OK, you knew the sex life of the Moonies had to be a bit eccentric, what with the mass arranged marriages in the stadiums and all. But I had no idea just how eccentric until I read this article from Nerve (link via Spanking Blog, because — I am not making this up — there’s a wedding spanking ritual). There’s an actual handbook for consummating the marriage (years after the wedding) and it’s got some very odd elements:
Two years after our wedding, I gathered our checklist of items for the Three Day Ceremony, the consummation of our marriage:
1) Two Holy Handkerchiefs. These were to wash our bodies prior to intimacy, then to collect the fluids produced by our final union in the ceremony; they were to be kept “eternally.” [Ewww! -ed.]
…
I pulled the pamphlet of instructions out of my bag. We showered separately, never having seen each other naked. After he emerged, I took my turn in the steamy bathroom, then put on my new underwear. Our undergarments had to be new for each day of the ceremony; black satin felt luxurious after the baggy cotton underpants I’d been slouching around in for years. I dressed in my ivory wedding gown, and over that my white holy robe. The sash of my robe was decorated with pink beads, Gabriel’s trim was green.
…
In the first part of the ceremony, the woman had to be on top, symbolizing the restoration of Eve’s act of love with Lucifer. After two minutes of foreplay, I guided him inside me. Instantly, I felt the emotional disconnect. It was the first time I had felt a man inside me for four years, and it felt good, but there was no holy passion, no divine ecstasy. I moved on top of him, concentrated on bringing him to an orgasm, then removed myself and lay next to him. Our ritualistic act of love was over in ten minutes. We wiped the fluids onto our Holy Handkerchiefs.
The official handbook said, “Go to sleep in peace. Sleep in pajamas and nightgown. Do not have a physical relationship outside of the content of the ceremony.” We lay on our backs next to each other, not touching, nor speaking.
Of course when reading accounts like this, it’s good to remember that there’s a long journalistic tradition of writing very loosely about the sexual practices of unpopular or unusual religions. (The technical term for this style of journalism is “making shit up”.) I’m not saying this account isn’t 100% accurate; I’m just saying that, like anything else you read on the internet, some healthy skepticism couldn’t hurt.
Similar Sex Blogging:
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=1221
I actually had a Moonie try to convert me several years before they ever made the news. Since I was am an atheist I thought her explanation of Rev. Moon’s divinity quite diverting.
If I’m remembering the old newspaper stories at all correctly they are sometimes married to total strangers in mass wedding ceremonies. Not one to celebrate chastity I can’t help but think there may really be fates worse than limiting your orgasms to self-manipulation (which they surely do whatever his Divine Nuttiness may say).
True? I don’t know. Easy to believe any story spread about that crazy little cult.
You mean that it’s not true just ’cause it’s on the internet? Nah!
It’s all true. I did an extended study on these lunatics in college. Unfortunately, most of this is acurate. Moonies are really, really, really wierd. And all Moonies are married in those mass ceremonies, not just some.
Holy passion and divine ecstasy!?!?!
Not sure God plays too much of a part in my thoughts at the point of penetration…
I understand the Rev chooses each couple by matching up photos of men and women.
Apparently you need to read more You Damn Kid then Unfurling http://www.youd....html
Ugh. I read the whole article and all I could think was what a poor, sad woman. And what an empty, loveless life. :(
“News” (especially on the net) is 90% bullshit
Holy jizz-rag Batman!