Jane’s Victory In Europe
As today, May 8, is VE day, it seemed only appropriate to contribute a timely ErosBlog post.
I have always admired Paul Fussell as one of our most elegant writers on war. An infantryman gravely wounded in France in March 1945 who went on to become a Professor of English, Fussell has given us three magnificent books on the British and American experience in the First and Second World Wars: The Great War and Modern Memory (about the First World War), Wartime: Understanding and Behavior in the Second World War, and Fussell’s own memoir of his experiences as a soldier and after, Doing Battle: The Making of a Skeptic.
Wartime contains a chapter entitled “Drinking Far Too Much, Copulating Far Too Little,” which might be of especial interest to ErosBlog readers. Fussell comments on the sparseness of erotic material available in the British and American world of the 1940s:
“Now, when the urban newsstand flaunts its pornographic wares which, if not heady enough, can be eked out with materials available at the nearest Adult Bookshop, and when your local X-rated film theatre routinely and legally depicts scenes formerly viewable only at stag parties, it is impossible to realize that things were once quite otherwise….There was no Playboy_ or Penthouse or Hustler and certainly no Squeeze, Rapture, or Adult American Dreambook. The sexiest magazine generally available was probably Esquire, with its drawings by “Petty” and “Varga” [sic?] of languorous girls with immensely long legs — thought more exciting then than now — and precisely delineated breasts.”
One wonders how our boys in uniform got through the war at all. Fussell goes on to say:
“Throughout the war the London Daily News ran a comic strip depicting a scantily-clad ‘Jane,’ much relished by the troops. Only on VE-Day did she go so far as to take off everything. This created a sensation, and many were not sure what they thought about it.”
I’ve often wondered about this particular May 8, 1945 strip. You can find some stuff on the Internet about Jane, but my casual search didn’t turn up the strip to which Fussell was referring. I had always imagined some sort of erotic payoff for the victors.
In a sense this turned out to be true, but not as I had imagined. Recently I acquired a book that contained the strip as part of its center plates, right adjacent to a portrait of a smiling Clement Atlee. (The book is Peter Clarke’s The Last Thousand Days of the British Empire.)
Jane prepares to celebrate VE-Day.
This leads to an unfortunate scene…
..that concludes with a joke in dubious taste.
Echoing a sentiments found in Clarke and Fussell, I must say that there seems to have been quite a shift in social mores between then and now. Or even between then and 1970. In 1945, a Playboy pictorial would have been beyond the pale. But something that looks suspiciously like a group assault on a young woman was the occasion for a joke in a widely-read newspaper.
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=3153
The joke seems to be a little more complicated than that. There was a lot of resentment at the time about a lot of armed, under-sexed Americans living in Southern England. Think of the Dirty Dozen.
In Esquire, Albert Vargas signed his work “Varga”.
When he drew for Playboy, he used “Vargas”
I recall the absolute frenzy generated by V-E Day as recounted to me by my mother, an Army WAC pilot. While in questionable taste from our vantage some 64 years later, it is the sense of the whirlwind of peace that overtook our fighting forces in Europe (and the utter exhaustion and relief of the British forces) that she described to me that could have conceivably resulted in “Jane’s” disrobing (Demobbing or demobilizing, indeed!). Even more surprising is the lack of any sense that anything overtly sexual had occurred in the comic strip. The situation depicted seems ripe for at least a “Victory Kiss”, don’tcha think?
I’ve only seen a few Jane strips over the years, and really wish some enterprising comic publisher would collect them. For something that seems to have had enormous cultural significance in its day, Jane is almost unknown now. This particular example is remarkable…
If I’m not mistaken, there was a movie version perhaps in the late 70s-early 80s which seems to have dropped into obscurity.
Jane appeared in the Daily Mirror. I don’t beleive there was ever a Daily News at around that time.
There was a film made:
http://www.play....html
The model for the comic strip, Christabel Leighton-Porter, also starred in it.
And if anyone wants to spend a few quid for the privilege of searching through the Daily Mirror archive, the link is here:
http://www.ukpr...line/
There was a short-lived attempt to revive it as a mixture of live-action and drawn backgrounds on the BBC, in the late 80s I think. It was very tame…