On “Using” Porn
I’ve long viewed the phrase “porn use” as a red flag that tells me the speaker is against porn. But I never realized precisely why the seemingly-innocent phrase was so loaded. Fortunately, Dr. Charlie Glickman nails it in an article at Good Vibrations:
On one of the sex education email lists that I follow, someone posted a question about “porn use.” And while I’ve seen this phrase used more times than I can count, it suddenly seemed to me that the term implies a bias that runs so deeply that it’s effectively invisible.
I think it’s rather interesting that people often talk about “porn use” even though they don’t talk about “sitcom use,” “talk show use,” or “romantic comedy use.” Instead, we might ask someone how often they watch TV, or talk shows, or movies. We might say that we enjoy Law & Order, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard someone say that they “use” Law & Order.
But when we get into the area of porn, we sometimes shift our language away from words that we use to talk about any other media and start using a phrase that sounds like we’re talking about drugs. People use Advil, or caffeine, or cocaine. And it seems to me that when we talk about using porn, we’re framing it in the same way.
Of course there’s more.
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=4784
I still fail to see what is so inappropriate about using the word “use” in reference to porn. Porn is a tool used for sexual stimulation just like a vibrator or a Fleshlight. It might not be a physical object that can be applied directly to the body, but it’s still a vital part of certain sex acts and sexual stimulation. From this perspective, it makes perfect sense to say one “uses porn” for sexual stimulation just as one “uses a vibrator” or one “uses a dildo”.
What I do find inappropriate is the implication that watching porn is the equivalent of watching Law and Order and a talk show. Let’s not kid ourselves. People watch those shows for the plotlines, acting, social commentary, artistic merit, and non-sexual entertainment. Very few people watch porn for those reasons, just as very few people watch Law and Order for sexual stimulation. It’s safe to conclude that both forms of media are created for and serve very different purposes and interests, so why should they be bound by the same language nuances? Why is it so offensive to use the word “use” in reference to a genre that has very blatant differences which separate it from the rest of all media?
sorry anon, I disagree with you. Porn is an art form. I read porn, I watch porn, I don’t use it. Like any other art form, there are many different aspects of it. Some people like, some don’t. Why *should* there be a different language nuance because something is “different”? Shouldn’t an art form deserve equal fitting as any other art form even if that art form is blatantly different?
I must confess… I do indeed “use” porn, to lower my blood pressure and to reduce my risk of stroke and heart attack, just as I also “use” the medications that my doctor prescribes and “use” water to hydrate my body. Something must be working by the way, because I’m still alive (since first coming across this bit of enlightening wisdom on this very blog back in 2002…
http://www.eros...r-me/
I vote for “to enjoy porn”. :-)
Anon – I don’t know if you clicked through and read the whole article, but Dr Glickman continued his comparison in the next paragraph, and accepted the parallels between “using” porn or drugs or alcohol to make ourselves feel a certain way… but also pointed out that we “use” movies to experience certain feelings too, to make ourselves feel happy, sad, scared etc. So he went more in-depth with his analogy than the excerpt shows. It doesn’t mean you have to agree with him of course, it just elaborates on his point of view.
I wouldn’t say “I come to Erosblog every day to use porn”. Because I don’t. I “use” my little box of toys about once every fortnight, and sometimes I view porn at the same time, as stimulation and accompaniment, sometimes I don’t. Generally for me, watching/reading/viewing porn is something I do with only a slightly raised heartbeat and an interested eye. The television programmes and films I watch have a very similar effect on me.
I think James also pointed out another problem with having a universal verb for porn – it comes (excuse the pun) in so many different forms – written, photographic, sculpture, all forms of human scribbling from oil paintings to cartoons, and of course the video that seems to be under scrutiny here.
There don’t seem to be many words that would cover all those varied forms of stimulating entertainment.
So let’s all just enjoy porn. I’m a porn enjoyer.
I use porn to do things like clear up clogged drains, make my kitchen floors shine and keep my roof from leaking all the time. It never works, but I enjoy it. By the way, Law and Order is an excellent hand sanitizer.
I don’t see much difference between “using” porn for sexual stimulation and “using” other forms of entertainment — Law and Order, for example — for a different kind of stimulation. People watch tv to fulfil all kinds of needs, and even if they may not be sexual, forms of entertainment still “serve” as tools towards those needs.
I agree, most heartily.
But the exception proves the rule. I certain am a Law and Order “user”… can’t fight insomnia without it. Powerless to control my addiction to re-runs. Cant’ stop singing theme song in car. It’s really pathetic.
How about this: you are all partly right. Some people watch porn, some people enjoy porn, some people use porn… and some people also abuse porn. And some people do all 4 things at different times and for different reasons.
I also want to say that I have read, and enjoyed, this discussion; and that I am using it to stimulate my thought processes. Thank you!