It turns out that for this hopelessly cute and very sorry spanked cheerleader, showing her hot paddled bottom to the parking lot is a substantial portion of the punishment:
From Cheerleader Spankings, found via Spanking Blog.
Similar Sex Blogging:
ErosBlog posts containing "spanking"August 1st, 2016 -- by Bacchus
Public Exposure Punishment For A CheerleaderIt turns out that for this hopelessly cute and very sorry spanked cheerleader, showing her hot paddled bottom to the parking lot is a substantial portion of the punishment: From Cheerleader Spankings, found via Spanking Blog. Similar Sex Blogging: June 15th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
Never Pee In The PianoThe Spanking Theatre tumblr is doing the world a great service in making an English translation of infamous The Young Girls’ Handbook of Good Manners by Pierre Louÿs, which was heretofore available only in the original French. Here’s part of the chapter “At The Ball”:
Similar Sex Blogging: May 24th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
The Erotic Art Of Bernard MontorgueilFor as long as I’ve been seeing dirty pictures online, I’ve stumbled over small galleries and individual examples of vintage female-dominant raunchily-explicit BDSM artworks attributed to Bernard Montorgueil. The detail above (don’t forget to click for a larger version, above and throughout this post) is pretty typical. The style is European from before the second world war, but never have I seen a detailed artist profile or a really good gallery that seems completist and authoritative. So, for the last couple of days, I’ve been doing deep-dive web research to see what it would take to create one. What do we know about Montorgueil and his art? Damned little, it turns out. This entry at the Spanking Art wiki is better than most web sources, and the info density is fairly sparse:
We are lucky to find the the catalog description from a 2014 Christies auction where four perhaps-unique Montorgueil manuscripts sold for £30,000:
We learn from this auction description that the Montorgueil manuscript drawings are not in fact “black-and-white” as suggested by the Spanking Art wiki article: they are “pencil drawings with touches of color.” But the wiki article is correct that many of them were colorized by a subsequent publisher. Compare one of the “touches of color” manuscript drawings shared in the Christies catalog (left) with the garishly-colorized version most commonly seen today (right): The colorized version can be traced to one of the “Leroy” reprints referenced in the Christies catalog; namely to Les quatre jeudis suivi de Barbara, (Éditions Dominique Leroy 1979, ISBN 2-8770-3016-4). (Bibliographic information found here; sample image is found in this image set). Another thing we learn from the Christies auction description is that at least some of the Montorgueil artwork we’re familiar with from the modern reprints is quite significantly incomplete. Christies offered this sample page from the sale manuscripts: As you can see, the original artwork was a two-page spread, excepting perhaps a 1/3-page box for prose. Subsequent versions on the art reproduce the left page portion only: This sort of discovery challenges my completist tendencies. What would it take to bring these artworks to the modern web, complete and un-cropped? Physical access to the manuscripts that sold at Christies last year seems the only sure way, and sadly there seems to be no public record of who bought them. Nor does it seem very likely that a collector who shelled out thirty thousand pounds would make his precious manuscripts available to some grubby sex blogger with his grubby scanner. Barring that, is there any evidence of full-facimile editions existing anywhere? The cropped example above is from our 1979 Leroy edition, one of the “many subsequent reprints by Leroy” cited by Christies. So we know the Leroy editions don’t have the handwritten text or the extended artwork that surrounded it. But might there exist some other more faithful edition? The earliest editions we know about are cited by the Spanking Art Wiki as follows:
Counting images, those two volumes together include 58 images; a near-match to the 59 images in Christie’s four manuscripts. But we’ve already seen the scans of the 1979 Leroy edition, and the images shown are the partial colorized ones. If it’s a faithful reprint of the 1936 edition (plus or minus some colorizing) the 1930s editions won’t do us any more good. But what about that intermediate “Belrose edition of 1970” Christies mentions? If the Spanking Art Wiki is right about the source of the Leroy editions in two 1930s volumes, then perhaps the “Belrose” edition Christies mentions is more faithful to the manuscripts? The Spanking Art Wiki lists four 1970 “Bel-Rose” German volumes, corresponding rather tightly to the four manuscripts described in the Christies auction:
Note that the image count listed for each of these four volumes hews tightly to the number of images listed for the corresponding Christies manuscripts. These might be more faithful facsimiles than the pair of 1930s portmanteau volumes reprinted by Leroy! There are hints out there that the Bel-Rose editions are indeed facsimile editions. For instance, take this mention:
This appears to be an auction listing for all four 1970 Bel-Rose volumes. “Publié en facsimilé du manuscrit autographe” translates to something like “published in facsimile of the autograph manuscript”, which seems hopeful. Other auction listings have the same wording. And that’s as far as we get on this bumpy road that is the internet. Would I like to get my hands on my own copy, with an eye to making high-quality scans? Yes indeed I would. But for that, I would need a substantial budget. Other rabbit holes we might go down: just how much Montorgueil artwork is out there? Our 59 images from the Christies manuscripts seem not to be the totality. Quoting from the Christies description:
Google turns up that auction listing as well:
A partial and mechanical translation suggests to us five more Montorgueil stories in the form of manuscripts with original drawings:
That would explain why, for instance, this now-defunct web gallery can have 84 images attributed to Montorgueil. I wonder, too, about this gallery. It contains 48 sketches that correspond to familiar Montorgueil images. Are they modern studies? Or Montorgueil’s own sketchbooks? As always when one dives deep into the history of erotic art using imperfect sources, we generate more questions than answers. Possible correction: I have used the “Montorgueil” spelling of this artist’s name throughout, in reliance on the Christie’s auction catalog, which I thought to be trustworthy in such matters. However, Steve M. points out that the 1970 Bel-Rose editions (which purport to be signed by the artist) use the spelling “Montorgeuil” throughout:
April 26th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
Surprised In Her BathtubSpanking Blog prefers to imagine this as an incipient spanking photograph, but I’m just enough of a theoretical voyeur (which means the idea of spying on naked ladies is fun, but drat those darned ethics!) to think that perhaps our bathing beauty in this vintage photo has begun to wonder why there’s a sudden draft from her bathroom door, which (it now occurs to her) she does not remember leaving ajar: Similar Sex Blogging: April 2nd, 2016 -- by Bacchus
A Humiliating LessonSpanking Blog says humiliation alone is not going to get through to this academically-challenged beauty. What do you think? Similar Sex Blogging: March 31st, 2016 -- by Bacchus
An Inviting BottomNow here’s a pretty panties-down scene to fire the imagination and suggest all kinds of possibilities: Via Spanking Blog. Similar Sex Blogging: November 22nd, 2015 -- by Bacchus
An Enema Made His Wife Beg For Anal SexHere’s a wish-fulfillment fantasy for the ages (not that there’s anything wrong with a good wish-fulfillment fantasy). Spanking Blog has a story in which a man administers an enema to his wife as part of a punishment, the experience of which makes her beg him for anal sex:
Similar Sex Blogging: |