ErosBlog

The Sex Blog Of Record
 
 

The Construction Of Catgirls

Tuesday, November 12th, 2024 -- by Bacchus

There were catgirls on ErosBlog within the first year of publication, way back in 2003. But I cannot say for certain whether I had carved out a category for catgirls in my erotic imagination prior to 2009, when Dr. Faustus, then co-blogging here at ErosBlog, wrote this essay on porn as an engine of progress in which he discussed hedonism, neophorics, and catgirls.

Starting from a launchpad quote by Eliezer Yudkowsky about living in a volcanic lair with a bevy of sexy catgirls, Dr. Faustus concluded that erotic pleasure drives innovation, and optimistically suggested that “maybe someday some clever bioengineer will actually deliver up a catgirl.”

While we all waited for bioengineering to get catgirls sorted out, heroic cosplayers were working the problem. Ears got better, tails got better, people were making their own fun. Catgirls are now easy to find. I’ve enjoyed encountering them on social media for many years.

However, after getting on Mastodon a couple years ago, it began to seem like catgirls were suddenly everywhere. So many catgirls! I swam along quite happily in this newly-discovered sea of parasocial catgirls until it gradually began to dawn on me: many catgirls are transwomen. Likewise puppy girls, bunny girls, fox girls, and so forth. But especially cat girls.

Please don’t demand that I prove this assertion. Upon briefest consideration, you would realize that the evidentiary requirements would make that effort ridiculous, impossible, and rude. Nonetheless, I believe it to be so.

Once I came to that conclusion, I had to decide how I felt about it. After a bit of processing, I realized I didn’t care even a little bit. If there’s still a component of trans panic in my psychosexual makeup, it’s going to rear up in situations more closely intimate than I am ever likely to experience with catgirls on social media. I don’t need to give a fuck, so I don’t give a fuck. That’s allowed me to enjoy the “clicker trained” meme beyond all reason. It’s also why I love the endless parade of TikTok memes like this one from NekoSheryl. They all feature someone responding to an inappropriate gender query with “You want to do a questionnaire and find out? Or do you wanna kiss and then feel out how you feel afterwards?”

It’s the perfect response to a question that’s super ridiculous. There are very few contexts where such a questioner has any need to know, and in all of them, the kiss will yield a more useful answer than the questionnaire.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 

What’s In A Name?

Monday, September 5th, 2016 -- by Bacchus

Do you have a name that you use online, one that doesn’t match your birth certificate? You probably do. And everyone who does, I think, will find something to appreciate in this essay by Epiphora about the complex ways in which a name self-chosen years ago — perhaps quite casually for some specific and limited internet purpose — can grow into a major portion of your identity:

For years, Epiphora was an online-only presence, but things changed when I started meeting and befriending other sex bloggers. Suddenly I found myself in a world in which calling someone “Girly Juice” was not only accurate, but necessary. In which you’d never ask someone’s legal name unless you were mailing them a package, and then you’d promptly forget it. I started dating a fellow sex blogger, calling them exclusively by their pseudonym, Aerie, which has become their preferred name. To them, I have always been and always will be Epiphora.

That’s when the name became truly mine. When I began forming relationships under it. When I began answering to it across hallways and saying it into microphones. It’s one thing to receive emails addressed to Epiphora; it’s another to hear the name spoken as a direct address. I still remember the rush of validation I felt when my sex blogger friends first referred to me as “Piph” and when the SheVibe crew christened me “Piphy Pants.”

She also touches on the odd double-standard that attaches to using a self-chosen name in the sex industries:

I’m always struggling to prove my legitimacy under this name. Facebook doesn’t believe me. Google+ doesn’t believe me. Advertisers don’t believe me; once they find out my legal name they start using it despite me signing every damn email Epiphora. In one particularly upsetting example, I gave an interview to Women’s Health and then was told they couldn’t use any of my quotes, as the editors don’t allow “anonymous sources.”

This is obviously bullshit, because the world already accepts aliases. Actors use stage names all the time and we don’t give a fuck. We are fine with mononyms like BeyoncĂ©, Lorde, and Rihanna. We accept Snoop Doggy Dogg becoming Snoop Dogg becoming Snoop Lion. But with sex bloggers (and sex workers, and porn performers, and anyone else in the adult industry), thanks to slut-shaming and sex negativity and patriarchy, there’s a stigma. Our words carry no weight. We’re seen as people obfuscating the truth, “hiding” behind “personas,” whose opinions can’t possibly be trusted because we don’t have the guts to write under our “real” names. We must be ashamed of what we do, because sharing our sex lives is inherently shameful.

As all the OG bloggers used to say back in 2002 when blogs were young, there’s much more. Read the whole thing.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 
cupid