January 9th, 2009 -- by Aphrodite
The Wizard’s Wonderful Wand
I know, I know! Referring to Daniel Radcliffe as his Harry Potter character does him a grievous disservice. But when you see the picture I just found on my hard drive, I think you’ll agree my title is a good choice:
I don’t remember where or when I found this, but it had to be after this post. He is gorgeous all the way around! Here’s the full size picture…..just in case anyone wants a better look.
(Who knew that working on a New Year’s resolution could be so fun?)
Similar Sex Blogging:
This entry was posted on Friday, January 9th, 2009 at 1:25 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response.
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=2831
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=2831
This photo is linked by a comment to the post you link to above (now I’m confused). That link claims it’s a fake but does little to substantiate the claim, as far as I can tell.
Wow. I’m definitely going to have to see Harry Potter now…
I hate to add to the “FAKE” conversation, but if you click the mentioned link it’ll eventually lead you to some video of the Equus performance, where uh, you can see the truth. :( Not that I care, a dick’s a dick. And the thought of all the prudes who whined about “Harry Potter” performing nude seeing this picture is hilarious. “HE’S GOING TO CORRUPT OUR YOUTH WITH HIS MASSIVE SCHLONG!!!”
It’s not faked. Google “Daniel Radcliffe equus” and you’ll find some other shots and information about him performing a nude scene in the play “Equus” a story of a psychiatrist who attempts to treat a young man who has a pathological religious/sexual fascination with horses.
http://en.wikip...play)
The “faked” claim is about the frontal nude picture, not that he starred in Equus. And it’s close enough to the Photoshop debate that my patience is pretty thin. Unless someone finds a link that is informative as to the nature of the picture, let’s drop it, mkay?
Lucre, even though I read my old post before linking it here, I totally missed Anon Y Mouse’s “wand” comment…..proves how trite it is already…..
Sheesh! You do realise you can’t prove a negative, right? You really think that if a front-line, top-rated youth actor was photographed posing dick-out, the only evidence would be floating round the dustier corners of the internet? Plausibility, please!
[30 seconds later…] This is how the photoshoot went down – he’s wearing jeans:
http://www.jaun...s.jpg
Note how the ‘nude’ shot has lost all the background right where his belt would start.
Yes I know you can’t prove a negative, but Dave, your explanation isn’t proof either. We can all claim we know how it went down based on pictures we can find online, but unless we were there it’s all guessing and pointless.
I’ll delete any more comments on this thread that continue the real vs. photoshop conversation.
The picture’s lovely.
But when you find one of Alan Rickman in the buff… then my head will really turn.
I know. Unlikely. A woman can dream, can’t she?
This picture is great but a whole lot better when the real thing is only 6ft in front of you. It’s even more impressive because he gets a little excited at the end the of the play.
Hey Aphrodite, did you notice that Violet Blue picked up on your post and credited us when she used this image in her “Hot Boy Thursday” post?