“Not Into Golden Showers”
Seriously, Twitter? Are you fuckin’ with me?
Of course there’s only one person this could be about. You know it, I know it, nobody on twitter needs to click. But I did. And of course it was the former guy, per the Daily Beast:
Top GOP operatives and U.S. senators were in attendance for Trump’s speech at the National Republican Senatorial Committee where he lauded himself as the savior of the party. “It was a dying party, I’ll be honest. Now we have a very lively party,” he told them. [I]n a bizarre and unprompted tangent, he addressed unsubstantiated claims about what he did with prostitutes in Moscow before his presidency. “I’m not into golden showers,” he reportedly told the crowd.
With this mope, the unsolicited denial is the confession, every time.
Similar Sex Blogging:
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=27978
But how does he know he’s not into golden showers if he hasn’t tried one? Although the term implies that he’s the one being pissed on, the rumour I heard is that he was simply in the room as some hired ladies pissed on the bed that was used by the Obamas. That’s apparently urolagnia (enjoying the thought of someone pissing), so technically he could be telling the truth, while avoiding saying the actual event didn’t happen :D
I know this convo is all in good fun, but why are we going into contortions looking for a theoretical scenario in which the man might be telling the truth? He never speaks without telling a non-stop stream of big steaming whoppers, so, I mean, that would be the low-energy assumption here.
Not even dishonest people lie all the time, otherwise they’d spend their entire lives eating food they hate.
The hilarious thing is that he brought it up, I wonder if someone is leaning on him to work harder to be relevant? I think the more interesting thing is that it’s on his mind atm…
I first heard of the alleged incident from a dyed-in-the-wool conservative acquaintance, who was sharing it proudly and boastfully, and they claimed it was from a reliable conservative source (which they failed to name).
Their claim was that the act was being boastfully related by the man himself, and that he just “watched” gleefully.
I remember thinking at the time that this was an interesting choice of revenge. President Obama had made a pretty good joke about the man with the orange tan, at the famous comedic Washington Press Club Foundation’s “White House Correspondents’ Association” dinner. The camera swung to the butt of the joke, who was in attendance and seated at a nearby table, and you could so unmistakably see him narrow his eyes, revealing his displeasure. I remember thinking that if ever you could read someone’s mind, in one of those “if-looks-could-kill” moments, that this was it! The fact that retaliation became so known as a chief component of his personality, that when I first heard of the golden shower incident, I didn’t doubt its veracity for a moment.
It was much later, when I heard that he was perhaps a more “active” participant, that suddenly the conservatives, who were originally the propagators, became the deniers.
That’s an interesting gloss on the story. It could even be that the original boastful story was a/the lie — shocker! — given the rather frantic tone of the denials after the story changed. We’ll never know unless Putin’s video gets loosed into the wild, I suppose.