August 11th, 2023 -- by Bacchus
Cartoon Titty Fucking
Despite the noted taxonomical and nomenclatural difficulties inherent to a good tittyfuck, it’s an ever-popular subject for artists and photographers. Not to mention (no, whoops, I just did) its popularity wherever dicks and tits come together in the same venue:
This breast sex artwork is by Erenisch, for the Dofantasy comic Roommates.
Similar Sex Blogging:
This entry was posted on Friday, August 11th, 2023 at 6:56 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=31538
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=31538
I think your readers might be interested in a picture of DoFantasy fandom if that is accessible to you. They have been around for a long time (since at least 2003), but who reads them? Are they a whole pop-culture thing like John Norman’s Gor, or do they just circulate from munch to darkweb chat to lonely submissive lady?
I would really like to know, and I don’t! I only share the most carefully-curated snapshots and selected panels here, because as a rule (and this is a wild overgeneralization when applied to six or seven hundred titles) their stuff is rapey and misogynistic. They had two or three competitors in that space that didn’t make it, and they aren’t turning out new titles at the pace that they used to. But I genuinely don’t know who the fans are.
Bacchus: thanks! I just know the excerpts, but they do seem “creative and well-drawn but misogynistic and rapey.” Non-consent is a common fantasy, but if you are in to women, misogyny is poison.
Though a lot of women might have you think otherwise, I suspect that it’s entirely possible that for every man who has a tit-job “fetish”, there is a woman out there who actually enjoys giving them.
Enthusiasm can be quite contagious.
Even when it includes a “facial”!
(…and sometimes ESPECIALLY when it results in a facial.)
If there’s no fun and enthusiasm in your sexual activities, then perhaps you are poorly matched to your partner.
The “Oh yeah… take it”, can be titillatingly humorous if said “tongue in cheek” (He said somewhat obliquely…)
If the guy is serious, it is likely misogynistic. In fact, if the guy is attempting humor, it may even be somewhat tevers
Sorry, I was on my smart-phone, and my fat thumb once again hit too close to the tiny “submit” button when trying to correct a typo.
I was about to say that a humorous delivery could ALSO be a bit of a somewhat reversed mysogeny…
Dr. Whiplash, the marketing material for the comic begins “In the Year 2022, many countries pass the ‘COMPULSORY FEMALE SLAVERY LAW’ which relegates the status of women to exchangeable property. … To Isabella’s despair, her family sells her to her former boyfriend as his pet-slave just to pay for a new TV set. ” That could be the start of a harmless fantasy or a misogynistic rant, it all depends on the delivery.
There’s a reason that only select Dofantasy panels and sometimes just portions of panels ever make it here to ErosBlog. I am a big believer that unwelcome context need not taint non-photographic images, especially if it can be stripped away with a clever crop or a judicious act of excerpting. That’s a philosophical position that not everyone agrees with, but many many ErosBlog posts rely upon it. Sometimes (but rarely) when I don’t link to source material at all, it’s because the source material (or more often, the surrounding website) is so toxic that I don’t want my link to repair the unwelcome context that my curation deliberately stripped away.
I also don’t have anything against non-consensual fantasies OR against degradation fantasies, but being too graphic about either one crosses the vaguely-drawn lines that limn ErosBlog editorial policy, at least in my head. How much is too much? I can’t tell you, but it’s for sure the case that degradation material squicks me sooner and faster than fantasy noncon stuff. I guess I just prefer my villains to be polite and well-spoken? Alternatively, perhaps I want my villains to own or even revel in their villainy, rather than taking the cowardly path of dodging its emotional and moral weight by dehumanizing their victims with rough words and objectifying insults.
Older Dofantasy stuff often also included blood and gore, in addition to the rapey stuff. I’m not sure about my moral position about non-consensual fantasies depicted in drawings, but that’s what crossed the line for me in terms of any possibility of enjoyment.
The general cleanup (or, depending on your point of view, censorship) of the “dark erotica” part of the adult web that was forced by various waves of Visa/Mastercard billing crackdowns seems to have forced those titles out of the DF catalog these days, but you’re not wrong, they did used to have a few titles with that content.
A long time ago you shared a DoFantasy comic by Erenisch where the villain is conditioning the zombie sex slave with his dick while his scantily clad female assistants look on in disgust. That also seemed like it could go in different directions, but whichever direction they went, I don’t want to assume “no woman/man/enby could be in to that!” because Eros is a rebel.
This one, I think. And yup! Everything is fetish fuel for somebody.
Someone needs to put a stop to this idea that heterosexual male aggressiveness is always (or even usually…), unwanted by all females. (Now please don’t take that literally people)
I’m just saying that there are plenty of females in this world with a healthy enthusiasm about the idea of enjoying sex with a man, and plenty of them like their man to have strong fetishy ideas, and for some, the greater and more bizarre the variety of kinky ideas they want to experiment with, the more pleased they are to spend time with them.
“Bedtime” should be playtime.
On that note, this one time, when I was in band camp….
You’re absolutely right, of course. “No woman would want that…” was a thing I believed while reading politically incorrect kinky books as an adolescent virgin. It turned out to be really incorrect.
Which gets us back to “I wonder what the audience is?” If its balanced as to sex, that suggests that their kinky hearts (or other bits) are in a healthier place than if its mostly frustrated guys and the occasional submissive or machoistic woman.
Dr. Whiplash, rather than spend another hour trying to write three sentences, I will say that it seems there are two cases. Once two people are already interacting sexually, asking them if they would like to be tied up and edged (or whatever) is just pulling up your big-boy pants and using your words. Making persistent aggressive passes at women gets tricky because many women get far more unwanted sexual solicitations than most guys can imagine, and are more likely to face physical danger if they say no. Sometimes no does not mean no, and some terrible guys get results with those brash advances, but thinking too much about either is poison for a sexually unsatisfied straight dude. Those thoughts took an hour to articulate and I would not recommend that anyone listen to my opinions on sex and romance.
An Elizabeth Hackford in the UK has come out with a memoir of her BDSM experiences including some very rough things titled “Exodai.” I don’t include links in comments because if I do, the comment is likely to vanish into a spam trap and never be seen again.
Vagans, all comments with links go into the moderation queue and can take a few days to get released, but most such comments by regular commenters do get approved eventually.
Bacchus: thanks! Me, I am doing more things where I meet women, and not trying to decide whether ‘the culture’ is causing straight men to err on the side of not hitting on women who would appreciate it, or hitting on women who have made it clear that they do not appreciate it. If you don’t meet people you think are cute, its kind of academic whether you would express your interest too aggressively or too quietly if you met them.
The memoir has a website https://exodai.co.uk/