June 10th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
Have you every been frustrated by the fact that good porn is made obscure and hard to find because it gets described with bad keywords? I know I have! Here’s Shira Tarrant talking about the problem in The Atlantic:
It starts with how pornography is keyworded. So, people put in search terms, but those search terms aren’t all that original, really. Because where do we learn the search words that we’re looking for? It’s sort of a chicken-and-egg problem. And so porn gets keyworded in very stereotyped, often sexist, often racist ways, and also just with a narrow-minded view of sexuality.
If you are interested in something like double oral, and you put that into a browser, you’re going to get two women giving one guy a blowjob. If you put “double oral” into a browser you’re not likely to get two men or two people giving a woman oral sex. That’s just not how it’s keyworded. That then feeds into what the industry decides to make more of.
Similar Sex Blogging:
June 9th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
She looks like she’s ready to climb down off that rack and take care of some business, just as soon as the rest of her parts arrive:
Apparently this still is from the Terminator TV show Sarah Connor Chronicles.
Similar Sex Blogging:
June 8th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
I’ve always been fascinated by artwork showing fantastic and impractical sex toys. This one is the Deep Throat 5200 from xxxx52:
Similar Sex Blogging:
June 7th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
If stainless steel sex toys appeal to you the way they appeal to some of us (ahem), you might want to know about the Steel Pleasure Lever. Think of it as your handy little pleasure crowbar, you orgasm burglar! So many possibilities in this heavy curve of stainless steel:
Similar Sex Blogging:
June 6th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
The highly-recommended Twitter account Whores Of Yore recently posted a version of this vintage photograph:
I had seen it before, and always assumed it was an early pornographic effort to imply or perhaps to simulate an anal sodomy scene with a “foreign object”. I quite like the shirts and sideburns of our dastardly duo, but otherwise the photo just seemed an ancient oddity.
Whores of Yore then published a version of this additional photo from the same photoset, which puts a whole new light on the proceedings and the foreign object. Is Captain Sideburns blowing something up her ass?
All of which stimulated a quick search for additional photos that might shed light on the activities in the scene. Sadly, I found just one more photo, which I am parsing as coming prior in time to the other two, unless Captain Undershirt paused mid-scene to put clothing back on:
If y’all know of more photos from this sequence, please share!
Similar Sex Blogging:
June 5th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
Here’s your inspiration for how to spend your first lazy Sunday in June:
Said to be from the movie Bad Girls (1981).
Similar Sex Blogging:
June 4th, 2016 -- by Bacchus
Dr. Marty Klein has been thinking hard about Rule 34 and what it tells us about human sexuality:
Rule 34: If it exists, or you can imagine it, there is porn of it. No exceptions.
Rule 34 summarizes everything about sexuality.
It says that human sexual fantasy is limitless. It says that anything can be eroticized, can be arousing, can be life-affirming. It reminds us that any ideas we have about what’s normal sex are about us, not about sex. I’m always telling patients “don’t blame sex for your ideas about sex.”
Rule 34 reminds us exactly what pornography is: a library of human eroticism. Pornography is a celebration of how humans can stretch their erotic imagination–sometimes in ways that disturb you or me. Nevertheless, pornography celebrates the erotic imagination BEYOND specific content. Like the ability to imagine the future, and the knowledge that we’re going to die, the enormous range of pornography is uniquely human.
Rule 34 also reminds us that people don’t necessarily want to do what they fantasize about. Sex with Kramer, George, & Jerry at the same time? Sex with a dolphin? Sex with someone about to be guillotined for stealing a loaf of bread? Sex with your grandmother at high noon on Times Square? A threesome with Batman & Robin?
Rule 34 also reminds us of the coin’s other side–that none of us can imagine the entire range of human eroticism. That should keep us humble. It’s somewhat like a gourmet travelling to a far-off, isolated country and discovering they eat something there he never considered food–say, fried worms. The issue isn’t so much does the gourmet want to eat fried worms; rather, it’s the idea that there’s “food” that he never considered food. And if that’s true about fried worms, about how many other “foods” might that also be true?
Rule 34 shows us all knit together in an erotic brotherhood (or sisterhood, if you will). If the human project of eroticism is bigger than both you and me, your turn-on and my turn-on that appear so different from each other are really small parts of a much bigger whole. And there are others who are into your turn-on (which I find so exotic), and there are others–perhaps many others–who think my turn-on is so very exotic.
Similar Sex Blogging:
