It’s the first day of Christmas at Kaya’s house, and she’s lit the first Christmas candle.

Festive!

This post-orgasmic photograph reminded me of my Two Smiles post. Isn’t she pretty?

We’re looking at model Annette Schwarz, and to obtain that smile she’s been playing with the fucking machines at FuckingMachines.com.

Some time ago I wrote a post called Crapping All Over Beauty in which I discussed the odd phenomenon of guys who run around the internet finding fault with every image of naked beauty. At that time I wrote:

What I’ve learned running a sex blog is that there are a whole host of guys whose only mode of discourse about bodily appearance is to make a negative comment. I think perhaps it originates in adolescent one-upsmanship; one guy says “Sally’s hot, I’d like to do her” and the other guys all say “No, man, she’s a pig, she’s got a huge ass” as a way of belittling the first guy. However it started, the result is a fairly large class of guys whose reflex response whenever they see an erotic picture is to say something mean and ugly about the body depicted.

It’s clearly an act of emotional aggression, some sort of attempt to establish superiority by expressing contempt for that which other people consider beautiful. An extreme form of this (which I’ve seen in various places on the internet) is the “It’s a tranny” game. The way the “game” is played is to post a picture of an unknown but pretty woman, and then wait until other men admit that the woman shown is lustworthy. Then the trap springs, as the original poster (or others) assert “It’s a tranny!” It doesn’t have to be true; the point is merely to score points by belittling another man’s opinions about sexual attractiveness.

I’m posting today to point at a concrete example of this “game” that showed up (or tried to) right here in the Erosblog comments. Remember the odd panties-down-but-we-have-beer-cups photo from yesterday? The girls are reasonably cute, but that notwithstanding, we got this attempted comment:

I dont think theyre women… arent you wondering what theyre holding in those cups?

No, dude. Are you? Interesting. Maybe you’re imagining what you wish were in there?

Anyway, crapping attempt: rejected.

A limerick in the best ancient tradition, being both sexually scurrilous and ludicrously anti-clerical:

A habit obscene and unsavory
holds the Bishop of Boston in slavery
midst hootings and howls
he deflowers young owls
which he keeps in an underground aviary.

Attributed to John Steinbeck (albeit the attribution is given by Robert Anton Wilson, so you pays your money and you takes your chances).

Similar Sex Blogging:

• The Handjob Sisters

If you know what’s going on in this photo, you’ve a better grasp of college culture than I do.

Seems safe to speculate, though, that beer was involved.

In which a little too much boy energy gets all jammed up inside a computer animator, and then, in due course, comes out again, as it will:

From Bondage Blog.

Similar Sex Blogging:

• Gingerbread Bukkake
• Anime Figurine Bukkake
• Blowing Bubbles
• Money Shot
• In Case You Were Wondering: Bukkake

Wow, girls kiss way differently than guys. Girls touch way differently. So much…. softer? Kinda but it’s a completely different energy. If I was blindfolded, completely sensory-deprived, I’d be able to tell the difference.

That’s what Cinnamon says. And I agree, even though both can kiss hard or kiss soft, or be rough or be gentle, and both can really really want you, there’s just something different about girl energy and boy energy.

It’s been too long since I’ve gotten any girl energy. Which probably explains why this lovely picture from Glamazon is so mesmerizing to me:

The very selective colorization might have something to do with it too!