Ms. Naughty On Porn Marketing And PR

I pretty much kept my mouth shut last week when the adult internet and especially sex-blogging Twitter blew up in outrage over the Bustle/Bellesa story. In case you missed it, Ms. Naughty has a good summary with the pertinent links; my perhaps-too-cynical summing-up is that a fairly generic “porn-for-women” themed tubesite got too successful in its traffic-seeking public relations operation, forgetting its fundamentally villainous positioning in the porn economy and winding up with some high-profile media coverage that exposed it to a blast of outrage it was ill-prepared to weather.

I am not myself well-positioned to inveigh against the tube sites these days; they are, like the banks Willie Sutton loved to rob, where all the money is, and in recent years I have done a variety of business with them, ranging from selling them sponsored posts and links through doing contract writing for their house blogs to continuing the affiliate promotion of porn sites that they bought with their profits. But I can’t deny a certain sense of schadenfreude at the recent spectacle: an instance of the tube site business model, which has done so much damage to the porn industry writ large, blowing up in its owners’ hands like a hand grenade not thrown on schedule.

But that’s not why I decided to highlight Ms. Naughty’s post. No, I thought her comments on the increasing role of public relations in porn marketing were fascinating, bringing together many things I have slowly come to observe without fully understanding:

[T]he thing that has struck me about this entire shebang is the growing power of PR within porn. Specifically, that becoming successful in porn now often relies on getting yourself into mainstream media publications. And if those publications happily repeat your slogans for you and present you well, you can build a big website in a very short amount of time. If you can sucker in some startup capital with those publications, you’re off.

…

It used to be that anyone, including me, could get traffic via Google and other search engines (ah, the good old days *shakes fist at cloud*). That doesn’t happen anymore because Google’s results for porn searches turn up two things: major tube sites like Pornhub and news articles about porn.

…

So if the tube sites are hogging the search results, today’s pornographers have to rely on PR to let people know they exist. The female director to most successfully do this over the last two+ years has been Erika Lust. I believe she has three PR people working for her and it has resulted in hundreds of mainstream media mentions for her. When I look at discussions around the web about porn that women will like, Erika Lust’s name is the one that comes up. Cindy Gallop of MakeLoveNotPorn is also very good with PR, especially because she was originally in advertising to begin with.

I would say that Bellesa’s PR campaign was also hugely successful. The site only launched in February 2017 and it clearly had a shirtload of traffic and recognition by the time this week’s drama happened. It’s a textbook example of the tech industry/startup culture top-down approach to porn: a flashy looking website that needs vast amounts of capital to begin, large offices, great PR, extensive “market research” and… oh maybe some porn in there somewhere. But not icky porn. NICE porn. Because you need to differentiate yourself from the mainstream and look vaguely respectable to avoid the inevitable stigma.

(By the way, I’m doing my best to keep the snark out of my tone but I suspect it’s creeping in. I’m old in porn, I’m jaded and I’m jealous. After 17 years I’m still running a porn business from my home office, doing everything myself, barely covering the bases but doing my best to create porn that I believe in, like I always have. I’ve been profitable because I stayed skinny. But If anyone wants to give me a wheelbarrow of cash or do PR for me, I’m very open to suggestions.)

…

It’s no wonder everybody piled onto Bellesa this week; for once there was a tube site with a real contactable person behind it and we could actually do something other than just send out endless copyright infringement notices.

Meanwhile, those of us who are actually trying to make ethical and feminist porn films struggle along, scrounging traffic from whatever source we can. The pickings are getting slim and good PR is gold but it’s hard to get. Getting a mention in a mainstream media article relies on networking, on knowing the right people, on sending out hopeful press releases. Or else it involves spending time writing your own promo pieces and submitting them for free, hoping the editor will take notice, hoping they don’t sound too much like blatant advertising. All of this requires time away from actually making porn and having a PR person is a privilege that only some feminist porn creators can afford.

I need to remind myself that this is the old world media hierarchy establishing its order on the previously-untamed, democratized internet. PR is the meatworld version of getting in the top 10 of Google results… especially now that Google doesn’t even pretend to be a level playing field anymore. Old websites without expensive security certificates have been scrubbed from the results. Media outlets get priority. Newer sites push out older, larger, established ones. Net neutrality isn’t guaranteed. It’s a bloodbath out there and I think I’m getting too old for this shit.

Indeed.

Similar Sex Blogging:

• BaDoink On #Pornocalypse
• Very Good Question
• The Most Lucrative Blog Post Ever Written
• I, Too, Scoffed At YouTube
• Still Clueless At Conde Nast
• Fraudulent Adult PR Emails

Porn Industry, Are You Listening?

Adele Haze has published a manifesto that should be required reading for anybody who makes, sells, or markets porn.

No, wait. It’s not a manifesto, it’s a tweet. But still:

I’ve written about a million decriptions of sexy pictures this morning. And none of them involve insults. See? It can be done.

Similar Sex Blogging:

• The Porn We Don't Show You
• A Spammer's View Of Porn Stars
• The Slut Lie
• Sex Spam Subject Lines
• No More Cum Buckets, Please

Porn, Described

Looking at porn is one thing. But, to state the obvious, porn is pictures, commercial pictures. Everybody who makes porn wants to sell it. Specifically, they want to sell it on the internet. Which means they need words about their pictures.

What’s strange is the way people write, commercially, about their pictures. Every nude is a “scorching hot teen beauty!” or a “filthy cum-covered nasty slut”. Every penetration is a deep dicking, every orgasm a screaming fountain of some hyperbolized fluid or other. It’s rare to find anybody who writes honestly and descriptively about erotic imagery.

It is so rare, in fact, that after seven years of sex blogging I sometimes fantasize about creating a porn blog or review site that allows people to market their own stuff, but only to the extent that their posts can survive some sort of Slashdot-style community moderation on the sole criterion of honest and non-hyperbolic descriptivity. The trouble is, I’m not sure anybody would participate.

Sometimes, I’ll even catch myself imagining what bits of porn — especially in some of its more specialized or unusual forms — would sound like if neutrally and fairly described, in sentences of standard English, without emphatic punctuation.

An unusual post on Bondage Blog triggered my lastest “porn, described” reverie. The linked gallery contains the following descriptive prose, mostly in all caps before I standardized it:

“Gorgeous babes and teens bound, tied, gagged, probed and submissively serving their master and misstresses [sic]. Real bondage. Real torture. Real pain. Real tears. Click here for more erotic fetish action! Submissive slaves bound in rope, chains, and leather. Domination. Discipline. Sadism. Humiliation. Hard sex.”

The picture displayed on Bondage Blog? Here’s my best shot:

A nude woman with a shaved head (think Natalie Portman in V for Vendetta) is tied with rope, in a squatting position, inside what looks like a wrought-iron basket. The basket, and she, are on top of a bale of hay, next to a ladder with a rusty chain hanging from it. She’s looking nervously at a reasonably-buff man wearing leather pants. He’s approaching her, and in his left hand is an old-fashioned wooden blueberry-picking scoop with metal tines.

I know my description wouldn’t sell porn the way “bound, tied, gagged, probed” presumably does. But I’ve got some sort of defiant, lingering attachment to the idea that words ought to be deployed usefully. Maybe a list of fetish-triggering words is useful in the sense that it encourages more credit cards to be deployed, but in the sense of actually painting a useful mental picture of the thing described, it’s full of fail.

Even more interesting is the fact that nobody sees the same things when they look at a porn picture. How would you describe our basket girl?

Similar Sex Blogging:

• Mark Davis Picks On The Girl With The Shaved Head