Generative Art: Ripped Android Sexbot
I promised myself that I wouldn’t let my new generative porn hobby become a blogging obsession. Especially because, for the last few days, I’ve been exploring “alien sex toys” prompt spaces that, Rule 34 notwithstanding, aren’t even associated with any common fetish. It’s just a weird notion that’s been kicking around in my pervert-brain for years with no outlet, since I’ve never been a visual-arts creative. Thus, I honestly was planning to exercise restraint in the posting of this stuff.
That good resolution flew all the way out the window when the ghosts in my machine served us up this super-buff humanoid-pattern absolutely terrifying (but possibly in a good way) sexbot. Currently equipped with a robust penetrative attachment that may or may not be “for display purposes only”. Autonomy rating and sexual-aggression settings are probably available in the manual, but I don’t read Rigelian tradecopy, so… be extra polite, I guess?
I know it’s really old fashioned for a blogger to ask for feedback, but at some point I’m going to have to ask: is this generative art stuff an annoyance, just “meh”, or something y’all want to see on a continuing basis? I mean, I haven’t been posting quite daily, so there’s plenty of room for throwaway “art” posts in between the regular ones, but if it’s too weird and creepy, at some point I’ll need to trust my regular readers to tell me so.
Similar Sex Blogging:
Shorter URL for sharing: http://www.erosblog.com/?p=31447
I find the AI art interesting. I’m sure it could get boring after a while, but for now keep it coming!
It’s interesting to see what it can come up with, though I think that a balance between new art and interesting stuff from the last century would be best!
Never fear, Falbert, I don’t think my obsession with mid-20th men’s magazines is ever going to falter!
It’s much more creative than what you usually see with AI art. I don’t mind it at all as long as there’s other content.
[…] of my readers has beseeched me (well, rather, offered the polite suggestion) that I not utterly neglect my gleanings from the lurid men’s magazines of the mid-20th […]
Personally. I would hate to see a large percentage of postings go AI.
I guess my fantasies are more powerful when I readily see them as capable of being actually tangibly realized in my future.
Well done vintage erotic art of particularly naughty sex acts can give me a bone, usually the more realistically rendered the better.
I do however recall seeing some multiple tentacle-sex drawings that were quite arousing…
I’d say if the percentage stays relatively small, variety in erotica is the spice of life. You already seem to choose to display a good balance, and I could not BEGIN to suggest an actual proper percentage.
Perhaps sometime in the future, as the old “Eight Ball” used to suggest, you should “Ask Again”
There is SO much unwanted noise in the results of web searches these days, it is hard for even the search savvy among us to find the correctly filtered results in a specific porn search.
For example I would invite your readers to search for photo images of a single blindfolded and vulnerably bound male, wearing a large open-mouth ring gag, forced into submission by three or more dominant females, featuring one or more of those females wearing strapons, and the male with his penis either locked in a chastity cage (or about to be), or locked bent backwards into a humbler and being in the “spit-roasting” position.
That may seem like a lot of search terms, but rule 34 tells us it’s out there.
A search for such will not give you purely correct results. Even striking a few searchwords in a narrowing effort would not likely give you correct results.
However, perhaps AI prompts would produce such a useful result, and provide the desired suitable imagery.
It would indeed be most interesting to see the results.
Hey Great! Having you curate through a bunch of probably mediocre crap to post stuff you particularly like or find interesting for some reason is what I’m here for. THANK YOU.
Whiplash, you’re not wrong. That is a tricky search, made worse by search engines that universally refuse to return porn imagery that they know about in response to specific search prompts. However, I am tempted to do a post just for you to see if my search-fu is up to it. No promises, but we’ll see.
At my current level of generative art prompt literacy, I don’t know how to generate images that specific that don’t have random extra limbs and the wrong number of fingers, which for me at least is going too deep into the uncanny valley. Not to say it isn’t possible, I just don’t know how yet.
As for posting frequency, here’s my current thinking, subject to change without notice. I seem to have settled into a rough schedule of posts every other day, more or less, and my present sentiment is to have no more than a few of these regular posts be generative art in any given month. But if I want to fill in extra posts on the off days (which may tend to look/feel like a generative art flood) I’ve given myself permission to do that. Again, as you say, subject to future feedback and figuring out how I like it when I look in the rearview mirror.
Thanks, Fuzzy! I appreciate the vote of confidence. And you are not wrong … my most successful prompts have turned up one or two interesting images out of twenty or so.
(long time lurker, mostly not poster but every once in a while I go to comment on a post I find while hitting random and find I’ve done so several years ago)
I disprefer the AI generated stuff –I love that you are willing to curate for us, and show us interesting stuff made by and for humans! I can’t get excited in the same way for AI, especially knowing that most libraries that they generate from are full of images that were not-exactly-ethically sourced. I’d much rather see the original underlying art from those artists than the awkwardly generated stuff.
(That being said, “occasionally” is a fine schedule to post it on, and I’ll just scroll past those ones, like I do with other stuff that doesn’t wet my whistle)