July 23rd, 2007 -- by Bacchus
Bondage Whipping
It’s been a while since I’ve posted any gay porn here. But I’d say these menacing fellows definitely qualify:
From Bondage Blog.
Similar Sex Blogging:
This entry was posted on Monday, July 23rd, 2007 at 10:10 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response.
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=1994
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=1994
Somebody out there will probably look at the artwork and grimace, thinking it’s a promotion of rape, but if you look closely, his captors may have large packages, but they’re not pointing towards their navels. It seems the only one truly enjoying the experience, is the guy tied in the vulnerable position. Not only is he NOT sporting an expression of horror or fear, he’s actually sporting wood. (But then, perhaps his tormentors lost theirs, when they noticed that he was enjoying it…?) At any rate, I’ll bet that if the female readers tied their male parners in a similar position, and then surprised him by strapping on a big rubber penis, though he may feign protest, they would be amazed at how often his penis betrayed his true fantasies… In fact, in that position, with posibly a little manual manipulation, you could have him give himself a facial. And with the employment of a spider gag or dental speculum, you who are deviously adventurous could find out if he spits or swallows… ;-D
When you take a moment to really look at it, the tone of this is actually rather sweet. The bottom looks completely blissed out — my cat looks like that when she’s getting a belly-rub — and the tops look thoughtful and contemplative. And they look very present and in the moment, and very focused on the bottom.
A nice piece. Do you know who the artist is?
I would venture to say “Tom of Finland” is the artist. Anyone second the motion?
Guh!
I love art.
(Sorry this comment is so lame – most of my brain is busy.)
Greta, I don’t know who the artist is, but Whiplash, I’m real sure it’s not Tom of Finland. Style is all wrong.
I would also guess that it’s not Tom of Finland. The drawing style is softer, for one thing. And — how shall I put this? — Tom of Finland didn’t exactly have the knack of capturing the gleam of intelligence in a person’s eye. In other words, his characters all look as dumb as rocks. (I’m actually not crazy about T of F for exactly that reason.) And that’s not true for this picture.
Yikes. I wouldn’t mess with those guys.
Another artist in this style who is completely unlike anything I have ever seen is “Franco” (sadly, he does not do M/F..just M/M.)…
Dave
Bacchus and Greta are onto something, I compared the post with other drawings (which were signed by ToF), and the tone does seem different. The reason I immediately jumped to the conclusion that I had initially reached, (besides the characteristic ToF-like use of boots and leather “Dutch Boy” or Fiddler’s cap) could be summed up by this Wikipedia article that describes ToF’s homoerotic characters as: “…men with exaggerated primary and secondary sex traits: heavily muscled torsos, limbs, and buttocks, and improbably large penises. Tight or partially removed clothing showed off these traits, with penises often visible as distinct bulges in tight trousers or prominently displayed for the viewer. His drawings frequently feature two or more men either immediately preceding or during explicit sexual activity.”
Besides, this appears to be a pen and ink drawing, whereas pencil seems to be “Tom’s” implement of choice.
However, in the same article, I did notice this quote: “There is considerable argument over whether his depiction of ‘supermen’ (male characters with huge sexual organs and muscles) is facile and distasteful, or whether there is a deeper complexity in the work which plays with and subverts those stereotypes. For example, some critics have noted examples of apparent tenderness between traditionally tough, masculine characters, or playful smiles in sado-masochistic scenes.”
Lucky boy, wish that was me…