ErosBlog

The Sex Blog Of Record
 
 
December 13th, 2019 -- by Bacchus

Topless Mona Lisa

About twenty years ago, the popular press lit up with stories about a 1515 “topless Mona Lisa“, said to be by a student of Leonardo da Vinci named Andrea Salai, patterned after a now-lost nude Mona Lisa that da Vinci himself supposedly painted. They called Salai’s painting “the topless Gioconda” — that being the name of the “prim and proper Florentine housewife” who modeled for da Vinci’s famous painting.

naked Mona Lisa

The popular press being prudish, as it tended to be at the turn of the 21st century, those stories don’t have any images of Salai’s topless Mona Lisa. I had to go digging to find it, but digging is good. This much more recent Medium post had the image, along with an explanation of why all the press excitement is sort of bullshit. It turns out that there’s a whole genre of erotic Mona Lisa knockoff paintings, in which Salai’s exemplar is far from the best. The genre is termed “Monna Vanna” after a character in Dante Alighieri’s love poem La Vita Nuova. This anonymous 16th-century Monna Vana from the Hermitage in Russia is far better:

nude mona lisa

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
December 11th, 2019 -- by Bacchus

Illicit Lust With Stolen Sex Dolls

stolen sex doll fucked and abandoned

This news is from ten years ago, but can a story about a man who commits burglary to kidnap blowup sex dolls for immoral purposes ever truly get old?

A PERVERT has twice broken into a Cairns adult shop and had sex with blow-up dolls before abandoning the vinyl vixens in a nearby lane.

However, police are on his tail, because the thief left his DNA on a doll and possible fingerprints on its face along with three other inflatable dolls and lubricants.

The owner of the adult shop, who wished to be named only as Vogue, said that in a first unreported break-in at his recently opened shop, the doll-snatcher had stolen five dolls and had sex with one of them.

“He has been taking the dolls out the back and blowing them up and using the dolls and leaving them in the alley,” he said.

“It is totally bizarre.

“It is a real concern that someone like that is out on the street.”

Vogue said a sex toy also went missing in the second break-in and that the offender had a liking for the doll model named “Jungle Jane”, which had been taken on both occasions.

Not content with his first two midnight liaisons, the burglar again smashed through a wall in the roof area of the shop on either Monday night or early yesterday morning but was scared off by a newly installed alarm system.

Cairns Police District crime prevention co-ordinator, Acting Sgt Cary Coolican, said the reported offences were being investigated. Coolican said in the case of the adult shop, scientific officers had taken DNA samples, fingerprints and pictures.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
December 10th, 2019 -- by Bacchus

Blowing Some Ass Bubbles

You know how your mother used to tell you not to swallow your chewed bubblegum? Yeah, this is why:

ass bubbles dance class on yoga balls looks like they swallowed their gum

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
December 9th, 2019 -- by Bacchus

“Ribbed For Her Pleasure” — Really?

I don’t know if Trojan still uses “Ribbed for her pleasure” as a condom advertising slogan, but they used to. But was it true? Do ridges on a condom really give her more pleasure?

It turns out that all the way back in 1998, an intrepid reporter by the name of Mark Leigh wondered the same thing. He decided to test the theory with his girlfriend, but she was dubious. He required an extended campaign of wheedling, but finally, he cajoled her into an erotic-research frame of mind. This comic article in the long-lost “webzine” LeisureSuit.net is his less-than-conclusive report on the matter:

Annals of Sensitivity: the Ribbed Issue

“You want to use my pussy for a Pepsi Challenge?!?”

Allison said this loud enough to make the waiters at the intimate little bistro I’d picked out just for this proposal blush. And they were French.

“Shh. Just, just calm down for a minute. Don’t Dworkin-out on me there.”

This was countered by a blank stare. I could tell my Vichyssoises was getting warm.

I was to determine if the human vagina can actually differentiate between the ribbed condom and the regular. I’m usually of the belief that the Big Companies are always out to screw us (condom companies perhaps a bit more literally) and will go to any ridiculous length to expand their market share. Soap companies realize that hair is important to many clean people–they invent shampoo. Most of us don’t have the lab technologies at our disposal to conduct research. And no men can really, really know what she’s feeling down there. My obligation to you, the reader: either to expose the myth, or to hop around shouting, “My God it actually works!!”

I figured Allison would support my lefty-anti-corporate-up-against-the-wall-muthafucka endeavour. I was wrong.

That evening was spent loveless, and each attempt I made to plead my case was shot down under cries ranging from personal embarrassment to patriarchal perpetuation of mystifying and thus disarming the female orgasm. Concerning the latter I argued that the sheer mystery of the female orgasm likened it to the much sought after, respected and worthy alternate planes of existence from the game Dungeons & Dragons that could be found neither by map nor magic, but through non-traditional means of navigation. She said only, “God, you are a boy.”

Weeks passed. My deadline loomed. If ever I tried to bring the experiment up, always umbrella-d by bridging a so-called gender gap, hit I was by a sideways glance. Anger and resentment were dropping by for weekend visits. Finally, a warm day. A walk, a midday beer, a black & white movie. We stopped at a druggist’s. I needed some Right Guard, Vitamin B-12 and dishwashing liquid. Allison made her way to the feminine sections. Before her stood a vast array of cleansers, douches, wipes and shields.

“You see what we women have to go through?!?” she pointed out.

“There’s enough material there to justify an amendment.” I countered. She smiled. On the shelf next to all this-Condoms. I was feeling, forgive me, cocky.

“Hey, whaddya say we give it a shot, huh?”

She gave a crooked smile. Would it make me happy? I said it would. Fine. I approached the counter with my goods, including a small box of Trojan Ribbed Condoms.

As we entered my apartment and took off her clothes, Allison offhandedly commented that I should have picked Sheik . . . she always preferred Sheik. I’m a pedestrian guy–I work with Windows, drink Coca-Cola, and use AT & T. I’ve only used Trojan condoms. Allison and I have been dating for two and a half years.

Back at the ranch, I disrobed, ignoring the ghosts of the legions of fantastic Sheik-wearers Allison has known throughout the years. We looked at one another in a sexless manner: this was science.

“I need to get the control condoms.” I rustled through my sock drawer and pulled out a half empty box of plain ol’ lubed up non-ribbers.

“Why have you got those?” she asked.

“This was the last box I bought . . . before you went on the pill.”

“Yeah, but, like, I went on the pill when you still lived at Columbia. Why did you bring that with you, you didn’t need it anymore?”

“I took everything from my medicine cabinet, threw it in a box marked ‘Medicine Cabinet’ and that was it. I hardly thought twice about it.”

She stood silent for a moment, her eyes not betraying a thought. Finally, “Am I right in thinking that everything in your ‘medicine cabinet’ box was quickly put in your new medicine cabinet once you moved here, with the sole exception being this box of condoms, which somehow managed to find its way to your sock drawer?”

She had a point. I don’t know why I put them in there. Maybe, subconsciously, her suspicions were correct: they were there to be kept in secret. But I had never cheated on her, nor did I intend to. But maybe there was a part of my brain, the very core of my masculinity, that worked on auto-pilot in the hopes that I may one day break free of my monogamy. And if I did, I would be ready for myself.

“Allison! I don’t–Th-the-they’re there because they’re there. They’re probably so old that the spermicide has turned to crust! Can we just do this and get it over with?”

“Words every woman wants to hear,” she said as she sat at the foot of my bed.

“Well, I’m dedicated to my craft. How many guys will purposely wear a rubber if their girlfriend is on the pill? Now get on your knees. I’ll have to enter you from behind, so you can’t see what I’m doing.”

“I can just close my eyes and picture Antonio Banderas as usual.”

“Ha ha.”

I had her on her knees, ass up in front of me, legs apart, and entryway poised at an angle of least resistance. Despite all the arguing, this was, and shall always be, a sight that quickly gets me . . . attentive. I rolled the first condom on, a ribbed one. I called out, as cold and clinical as I could, This is Exhibit A.

I entered her, and I immediately had two somewhat conflicting thoughts. Having not used a condom in over 18 months I was horrified in the intense drop in sensation. We in the AIDS generation rationalize depriving ourselves from the near-Roman sexcapades our older cousins had in the 70s with thoughts like–“Condoms aren’t that bad, you can hardly tell the difference.” Well, even though they’re handy in containing the mess, I can say, right here and right now, that you sure as shit can tell the difference.

Now, that being said, the second more Ralph Kramden thought I had was–Hey! Why doesn’t someone market these to guys with pre-mature ejaculation troubles?

I continued poking her, repeating, as sensually as I could “Exhibit A, Exhibit Aaaaaaay.” After a few minutes, she started getting into it, and she quietly started calling back, “Exhibit A.” There we were, cooing to each other, “Exhibit A.” I figured this is what Marcia Clark and Chris Darden’s love life was like. Then I pulled out, snapped the condom off, placed it back inside the wrapper (I’m particular about getting germs on my bed), ripped open a regular condom for Exhibit B and rolled it on.

“Okay, here comes Exhibit B. Are you ready?”

“Oh, I thought you were done.”

“What?”

“Well, I’ve got my head down in this pillow–”

“Well I’m not done! How could I be done? Am I ever done so soon?”

“Um . . . after a few beers . . .”

She sat up and faced me, and I scrambled to hide the condom wrappers so she couldn’t see whether Exhibit A was ribbed or not. Eventually she retracted her previous statement, after I cited countless precedents of intense masculinity, however she handed me this line about having to “warm her up” now that the “moment has passed.” This was all total gibberish to me, but I complied, and I spent the next little while kissing and rubbing her. Finally we got worked up to where we were before.

“Now,” I asked, “do you remember how Exhibit A felt?”

“Huh?”

“Exhibit A. I’m about to give you some Exhibit B, but you need to be able to compare it to Exhibit A, and that was already some time ago.”

“Whatever, j-j-just, come on already.”

“No! No, ‘whatever!’ What do you think I’m doing this for, my health?”

“Gee, I don’t know, a lot of guys like to have sex with their girlfriends.”

“A lot of guys who use Sheik condoms!”

Again, sitting up and facing me. She shouted, “Just what the hell does that mean?!”

I stared at the ground and mumbled a little. She persisted, what’s wrong, what’s the matter, why am I upset? I go mumble mumble Sheik mumble mumble condoms are better mumble mumble I never use Sheik condoms mumble mumble.

“So I prefer Sheik condoms. Is this the end of the world?”

“Do you prefer Sheik condoms or the cock that goes inside of them?”

“Don’t be gross.”

“What woman prefers a condom?!? Maybe you’ve got fond memories of past Sheik shags. The condom brand itself has no bearing in a woman’s enjoyment level!”

She countered, “What do you know from a woman’s enjoyment level!”

Once more, I named very specific and precise dates, places and scenarios to prove the contrary. And did so until she saw the error in her prior statement. And spun that the comment was made more in reference to my current interest in ascertaining female response to ribbed v. non-ribbed condoms. I nodded in acceptance.

We kissed and rubbed again for what seem like hours. Once worked up, and quite well I might add, she assumed the position. I entered, with a new Exhibit B, the old one not having survived all the tumultuous . . . ups and downs.

Exhibit B I reminded her. She huffed and puffed in agreement, playing along and trying her best to remain scientific, getting into it and saying things under her breath like, “Uh-huh, Exhibit B. Yep yep Exhibit B.” It was around here when I realized that Exhibit A, the ribbed rubber, didn’t really get a fair shake. I decided to extend my experiment to include Exhibits C and D, which would be another non-ribbed and ribbed respectively, changing the order just to see if she’s really paying attention. I hope you’re taking notes. And . . . Jesus . . . I’d better do this quick.

I quieted her down, and as quickly as possible unsheathed myself and tore open a new control condom. I noticed now, with three different condoms’ worth of lubrication over my member, that it is very difficult to roll anything new on. I panicked about taking too long. I really, really did not want to spend another twenty minutes kissing her. I forced the thing on and stretch my skin down my shaft. Painful. I told myself that once I got back inside of Allison the problem will right itself, like jumping in the pool with burning hot feet.

I was mistaken.

I poked her without any real rhythm or manner, and blurted out, “Okay, this is Exhibit C. Whattaya think of that?”

“Uh it’s great.”

I threw in a couple of long, slow thrusts, to make sure she got the point and repeated, “Exhibit C. That’s this.”

“Uh-huh. Got it.”

I tore open a ribbed for Exhibit D, and wiped all the spermicidal slime off on a T-shirt from the floor. I spent a brief anxious moment wondering what kind of germs could possibly be on this shirt, then I tossed it over to my open laundry basket. I missed, and then I had to decide whether or not to let this dirty, filthy shirt lie around in the open air or get back to the business at hand. I chose the latter.

I channeled my nervous energy from the stray shirt into giving Exhibit D a good show of it. A really good show. Allison and I were at our best. Great wailings of “EXHIBIT D” heard from both of us. The neighbors must’ve thought Court TV and Playboy had their signals crossed. As the deal looked like it was about to close for both of us, I recognized that this experiment had somehow mutated into good sex (which, as we’ve discussed, is not in any way an isolated event, but something, nonetheless, not to ignore). I got very depressed about wasting my upcoming orgasm trapped here inside a condom. Suddenly, a thunderbolt.

I exclaimed, “Exhibit E!” and tore the offensive latex from me. From condom to nothing . . . it’s like going from black and white into color. Letterboxed. Exhibit E, free and easy, I admit, does not last very long.

Exhausted, I crawled off the bed, put the shirt in the laundry bag, and asked, “So . . . whaddya think?” Oddly enough, this is not the first time I’ve used this phrase directly after sex.

She thought for a moment, then, “The best were Exhibit B and Exhibit D. Equally.”

B and D? Let me think. That’s a ribbed and a non-ribbed. I frowned and told her that they were both the same type, so we could conclude that there is no real noticeable difference. I am happy in my work. Then she adds, “Of course, there are so many other factors . . . technique, level of interest, buildup . . .”

Again I frowned. I have let my readers down. The experiment has no real scientific merit. Except for one thing . . .

“One thing I can say for sure,” she says, “the worst was that Exhibit E.”

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
December 8th, 2019 -- by Bacchus

2019: The Year Of Twitter #Pornocalypse

Folks, it’s official: Twitter is no longer an adult-friendly or porn-friendly platform. The pornocalypse comes for us all, and in 2019 it came for Twitter. A series of incremental rule shifts mean that Twitter now proposes to ban any predominantly-adult accounts. What’s more, they have formalized shadowbanning as policy without becoming any more open about the process or what triggers it. And finally, rule changes around “graphic violence” and “violent sexual conduct” appear to completely prohibit a great deal of kinky pornography, especially if it involves BDSM, urine, or semen.

Let me not overstate the case: we aren’t hearing — yet — about widespread banning of porn accounts from Twitter. But the rules are in place, in some cases since June. And it’s a fool’s hope to think “Perhaps they won’t enforce against me…” The usual pornocalypse pattern is to change the rules, wait a respectable period, and then start the porn bannings. At which point the rhetorical justification is “Why are you complaining? What you’re doing has been against the rules since forever, we were actually being nice for letting you slide so long…”

Once upon a time, the Twitter status quo was that porn was pretty much OK so long as you marked your account “sensitive” and kept your nose (aka your avatar and header graphics) clean. That changed in a policy dated March 2019, but the new policy didn’t actually appear on Twitter’s website until some time between May 25th and June 7th:

twitter pornocalypse: accounts posting sensitive media subject to banning

Yup, since June it’s been the case that “your account may be permanently suspended if the majority of your activity on Twitter is sharing sensitive media.” “Sensitive media” is graphic violence, adult content, violent sexual conduct, gratuitous gore, and hateful imagery. Adult content is “any consensually produced and distributed media that is pornographic or intended to cause sexual arousal.” Just in case you were feeling hopeful, erotic art isn’t exempt: “This also applies to cartoons, hentai, or anime involving humans or depictions of animals with human-like features. What’s more, the definition of “graphic violence” mysteriously includes “depictions of bodily fluids”, so no snowballing, ejaculation, facial cumshots, squirting, or watersports. The definition of “violent sexual conduct” is written in a way that prohibits vast swathes of BDSM porn, too:

twitter bans BDSM porn

“Simulated lack of consent” describes most modern bondage porn. And BDSM porn that includes whipping or spanking? That’s “sexualized violence”, because it’s almost never “immediately obvious if those involved have consented to take part.” Of course in commercial porn they have consented, but our proofs are in the context: the interviews at the beginning of the porn shoot, the happy smiles at the end, the researchable reputation of the porn producer, the willingness of the performers to return for additional shoots. Still images and short clips can’t usually encompass enough of this evidence of consent to make it “immediately obvious.”

After the March-dated set of rules that Twitter published in June, there was another update to the Sensitive Media Policy dated November, differing from the June (March-dated) set only by a few words. But there are also changes elsewhere in the Twitter Terms of Service (TOS). As XBIZ reports, Twitter is finally updating its TOS to permit the shadowbanning behavior for which it is already notorious:

In a nutshell: Twitter has explicitly reserved the right to shadowban, under the legalese of “limit distribution or visibility of any Content on the service.”

This is the paragraph from the March 2018 terms of service, which apply until December 31, 2019:

“Our Services evolve constantly. As such, the Services may change from time to time, at our discretion. We may stop (permanently or temporarily) providing the Services or any features within the Services to you or to users generally. We also retain the right to create limits on use and storage at our sole discretion at any time. We may also remove or refuse to distribute any Content on the Services, suspend or terminate users, and reclaim usernames without liability to you.”

And this is the revised passage, effective January 1, 2020 (italics added by XBIZ):

“Our Services evolve constantly. As such, the Services may change from time to time, at our discretion. We may stop (permanently or temporarily) providing the Services or any features within the Services to you or to users generally. We also retain the right to create limits on use and storage at our sole discretion at any time. We may also remove or refuse to distribute any Content on the Services, limit distribution or visibility of any Content on the service, suspend or terminate users, and reclaim usernames without liability to you.”

I tweeted about all this back in June, when Twitter started the #pornocalypse ball rolling, but I didn’t make a blog post then:

I did, however, predict new #pornocalypse rules in April, before they started rolling out:

There are several recent web articles offering more analysis of the Twitter #pornocalypse, but read them with care. All of them, to one extent or another, seem to conflate the changes in June with the recently-announced TOS changes that haven’t happened yet. That said, they offer more analysis of the implications than I’ve attempted here:

It’s long been my view that Twitter wouldn’t remain friendly to adult content forever. The pornocalypse comes for us all — there’s no social media platform that’s immune. But Twitter, famously, was the last major platform standing. It’s going to be a much bigger blow when they start banning all the image-posting accounts, the erotic-art accounts, and most especially, all the accounts of porn performers and other adult-industry people whose accounts exist for the sole purpose of sharing and promoting their work. I don’t care if people start defensively including 51% political tweets, or puppy tweets, in an effort to avoid the deathly “dedicated to posting sensitive media” label. If sharing of adult imagery is any major fraction of your reason for being on Twitter, you’re at risk of having some faceless support person, probably backed up by some algorithm that scores your account with an internal “sensitive media rating”, decide to terminate your account. Look for porn performers, artists, and, yes, sex bloggers, to start disappearing from the platform.

Don’t think you can argue “but my sensitive media wasn’t the majority of my activity! My account wasn’t ‘dedicated’ to it!” You can’t lawyer-lips the #pornocalypse. Once a platform declares itself adult-hostile, which Twitter now has, the actual enforcement is always arbitrary, capricious, and without much hope of meaningful appeal. Even if there’s “sensitive imagery” in less than 10% of your posts, say, a hostile eye looking at your account is likely to parse the image-sharing (especially if it supports your livelihood) as the thing your account is “dedicated to”, discounting the rest of your activity as ancillary chaff. You want get some anonymous underpaid outsourced support staffer to look at your statistics “proving” that porn is in less than 50% of your posts? First, you’ll never be given a chance to make that argument, and second, even if you somehow manage it, they won’t care. Good luck with that.

In the Daily Dot article I linked above, the report reached a Twitter spokesperson, who tried hard to suggest that nothing was really changing in all this. Then the reporter specifically asked about the banning of accounts “dedicated to” adult material that’s otherwise permitted by the Sensitive Media Policy:

When asked whether Twitter will ban users who primarily share consensual porn or fictional illustrations of consensual nonconsent, Twitter did not clarify.

That refusal to clarify speaks volumes, and what it says is nothing good.

I believe, too, that it’s significant that Twitter no longer denies shadowbanning. We can expect it to see it deployed a lot more readily against adult-focused accounts. There were limits to how far Twitter could go when their official claim was that shadowbanning did not happen. But on all social media platforms these days, sneaky ways to minimize the visibility of adult material are popular. An outright ban can be argued, if only in the court of public opinion. But search invisibility is a penalty that’s extremely difficult to prove, much less complain about — especially when it’s applied by secretive algorithms to content that fully complies with the applicable content policies and terms of service.

I’d like to wrap this up with some helpful suggestions about where to continue the adult conversation once Twitter finishes suppressing it, but I don’t have any. There are a bunch of minor social media platforms that have started up to implement free speech goals, but none that I’ve seen have the kind of adoption and broad social graphs (at least, not yet) that make the major platforms worth bothering with. At least for now, we’re facing life in a world where all social media is a hostile place for adult expression.

I know I’m faintly famous for my Bacchus’s First Rule coinage, which suggests we all retreat and retrench to web spaces that we control. I still urge people to do this; it’s the best way to save something from the pornocalypse. But it’s not even the start of a solution to the problem. We like social media for its connectivity. When all the platforms are united in putting porn firmly beyond the pale of acceptability, it may be possible to preserve our unwelcome adult-community identities by sharing our content from platforms where we can’t be deleted, but that does nothing to connect us again. When all the search and connectivity is controlled by massive porn-hostile corporate platforms, how do we find each other and our audiences?

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
December 6th, 2019 -- by Bacchus

Bondage Catgirl

I wonder if these three young ladies drew straws to determine which one of them would be the bondage catgirl for the evening? Hey, it’s cheaper than paying for a streaming TV package:

bondage catgirl and lesbians BDSM strap-on sex

Artist is Neongun.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
December 5th, 2019 -- by Bacchus

Lad Mag Flashback: Pickup Advice For Funerals

It’s very difficult to remember just how terrible the so-called “lad mags” were twenty years ago. I mean, I’m sure they are still terrible now, to the extent that they still exist. But magazines printed on paper just don’t have the cultural power that they did a generation ago. Maxim wasn’t even close to being the worst of the lad mags, but this article from September of 2000 on how to “score” at funerals is no way to prove that:

Score at a Funeral
Play it cool and there’ll be another lucky stiff getting buried today.

Your pal/coworker/Great-Uncle Ichabod’s dead and gone. Would he really want to see you blubbering away, or would he rather have you live it up in his honor, doing all the things his rigor mortis no longer allows? Cry and the world cries with you; smile and you just might get a phone number from that babe in black.

Tactic #1: Be the ‘life’ of the party

The key to breaking the ice is making yourself stand out in your target’s mind. When you’re surrounded by misery, that means putting on a serene, happy face. According to Nanette Pope, a Boston PR rep who met her beau at her great-uncle’s last call, it’s the man who celebrates living who gets noticed. “While everyone else was crying and avoiding eye contact, Carl just kept looking at me and smiling,” she explains. “He said he missed my uncle as well but that life was for the living and he wasn’t sure if he’d ever see me again. He was ballsy, and my defenses were definitely down. We’ve been dating ever since.”

Tactic #2: Show your sympathetic side

“Supposedly when women are grieving, they’re actually kind of horny,” says Ron Louis, coauthor of How to Succeed With Women. And while sappiness usually turns the honeys off these days, the rules go out the window when there’s a six-foot mahogany centerpiece. Show her you’re in tune with your emotions, says Louis, and she may start thinking of pairing up. Comfort the bereaved in an ostentatious way, and make sure your gal sees tears. (Carry sliced onions tied in a hanky, think about how the bastards canceled Knight Rider… whatever it takes.) When it comes time to console your target, says Louis, “use flirtatious body language. Hold her hand and rub her back. You’ll definitely get a phone number.”

Tactic #3: Jump her bones

No patience for sensitivity? Try a more direct approach. Turns out women can be just as prone to heartless perversion as men–if that new Oprah magazine isn’t lying to us, anyway. And that Kleenex-crumpling blonde, second pew from the left, may be just as turned on as you are by the concept of boning in a boneyard. Chat with her, advises Kurt, a 27-year-old funeral director in a small town he’d rather not get thrown out of, then comment on the easy access to limos and hearses, as well as on the dozens of private coffins available, and see where that goes. If you draw a horrified reaction, laugh sheepishly and claim that grief has wreaked havoc on your sense of humor. Then it’s off to the next pew.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
 
cupid