August 19th, 2006 -- by Bacchus
Sex Doll Accident
Looks like somebody got a little carried away, and blew out his steel-reinforced silicone sex doll:
This entry was posted on Saturday, August 19th, 2006 at 6:55 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response.
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=1699
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=1699
Wow, I’d like to see video of what happened to that poor doll. B^)
Is he now bragging about his atomic penis?
The mind boggles as it tries to work out what happened…
Why do they give a sex doll a clitoris?
clitoris is for practice, I think
sex = giving as well as taking
gruve dawg… right on!
What’s the warranty on this kind of product? I assume it covers breakage, except for breaking the cherry. Dayum!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Oh lordy. I don’t even know what to say. Better “her” than me I suppose.
On first impression I was a bit shocked… I was worried that some poor woman had recieved a little too much attention from an enthusiastic lover… now I’m curious!
I had no idea sex dolls could look so life-like!
And Cheryl, I agree with gruve dawg, though I’d like to add that a pussy without a clitoris, even a fake one, would give me nightmares. *shudder*
A little extra material to help maintain the fantasies goes a long way. ;)
Wonder if you can insure those things and what would you tell the insurance agent when you filed a claim?
dang! i always wondered how durable those things were.
i think there in the abouts of 300-600 dollars.
but dang…
Does give fillip to your imagination
Sorry, but I still don’t get it. Seems to me the kind of men who would have a toy like this wouldn’t care all that much about ‘practicing’ on a clit, plastic or otherwise. Pardon me, I believe my sexism is showing.
And, dawg…I’m well aware good sex is about reciprocity. I just don’t see the benefit of practicing that on a manequin. C’mon.
DAYUM!! I want my money back!!
~w~
Take it easy!!
The fleshlight tip is gold, for any not in the know. ;)
But a fleshlight is only an orifice. If we’re talking about the kind of man who would appreciate a lifesize doll that resembles the shape and contours of a real woman why pretend women don’t have clits?
Personally, before actually penetrating a woman I enjoy the sensation of rubbing the tip of my penis over the entire length of her vulva. From what I’ve been told a good number of women like this attention too. When I see a clit, I see a jewel worthy of my worship, and most of my fantasies aren’t complete without a little jewel honoring.
Forgive me if my assumption of your gender is wrong, but how would your sex life be different if you didn’t have a clit? How about a male lover without a head on his penis?
I watched a documentary on these Real Dolls once – these look like the tears that occur when people store them wrong.
Apparently there’s so much weight on them, you have to store them very carefully.
Ok this may be a stretch… but on a manequin, it’s all fantasy… so why not have as much realism as possible
? If you’re spending that kind of $, let’s go for quality. If on the other _hand_ you want something that’s all “feel”, order a fleshlight.
That photo is from the RealDoll Doctor, he fixes them.
I think he might of goofed up the fix… It now only has one hole in the bottom….
Virgo: I understand about the clit for realism. (Though to me, it looked so *unrealistic*…not many women have a clit so large it protrudes beyond the hood that much. And I was a Gyn or OB nurse for 17 years, so I’ve seen a lot of vulvas. Even aroused, I bet it’s the rare woman whose clit protrudes so prominently. Mine is always hooded, regardless the size.
What I found offensive about the design is that makes the doll look like the worst of female porn workers and so unrealistic when applied to most normal women.
And the suggestion of ‘practicing.’ Well, the only way to “practice” on a clit is with feedback. Anything less is utterly useless. At least as far as the woman’s perspective is concerned. There are no two alike. Truly.
Cheryl, I appreciate your contribution to the ErosBlog comments, but I need to warn you that your comments on this subject are treading perilously close to the limits of what is allowed here. As a matter of editorial policy, I try not to condemn or deride anybody’s preferred sexual practice or fetish. Yes, you’ll catch me in a verbal raised eyebrow or gasp of astonishment sometimes, or even gentle teasing of a particularly odd fetish, but I try not to say that anybody’s sexual practice is “useless” or offensive. Nor do I generally allow commenters to do so — Erosblog is intended to be a relentlessly sex-positive and fetish-tolerant zone.
You crossed the line the littlest bit when you shared your negative and self-confessedly sexist views about “the kind of a man who would have a doll like this.” Simply put, you don’t *know* anything about the people who spend thousands of dollars on their doll fetishes, and I won’t allow you to continue to snipe at such fetishists in this thread, displaying what you yourself have admitted is a sexist prejudice.
Play nice, OK? And remember — or know, if you weren’t aware of it — that a male masturbator can buy a very-realistic-feeling disposable gel pussy in a styrofoam cup for just a few bucks. If he’s paying five or six grand for a human-sized sex doll, there’s a good chance there’s a strong visual component to his fetish. Hence, the visible clitoris.
We get that the sex doll doesn’t conform to your standards of female beauty. So find one that does if you’re in the market, OK? But don’t come to ErosBlog to bash at the people who (apparently) like the product you’re not buying anyway.
Thank you.
What I said was useless was “practicing” clitoral stimulation on a manequin. The only way to truly gauge the effectiveness of clitoral stimulation is via direct feedback from your female partner. I don’t see how anything positive (for a future female partner) is to be gained from practicing strokes or licks or tongue flicks on a doll. The doll can’t tell you to ease up or move a little to the left, “yeah, there…”
Now, if one has been given a specific “homework” assignment from a present female partner on which to practice, then I guess I could understand the concept of practicing. Or perhaps as an exercise aide for those less endowed with facial, particularly lingual, muscles. That’s a valid reason.
I hadn’t considered the visual aspect of it and that’s very valid, I admit.
I think I may have to give up ErosBlog, sadly. I realized, as I read your response to my comments, that this is a feminist issue for me. My commentary was primarily directed at the design of the doll. As a nurse for 22 years, 17 of them in inpatient Women’s Health and, to a lesser degree, as a lesbian, I have seen a lot of vulvas. I have on only the rarest of occasions, seen a clitoris that large and pronounced.
My issue is not with a man who derives his sexual pleasure from the use of such a doll. Please. Everyone should do what pleases them, as long as no one is being hurt against their will.
My issue is with the distortion of normal female anatomy in the design of the doll. This doll does not represent the vast majority of the women in the world. My issue is with a culture that perpetuates these kind of myths about women. So many of those myths have cause so much pain for many women already. Isn’t it time we tried to stop?
This is not “realism.” (Though the thought of a vulva completely devoid of a clit is even less appealing to me) This is a fallacy and that is part of the problem. Are there any sex dolls out there that are genuinely realistic or does this represent the vast majority of this type of product available. I have to admit I don’t know myself because I have my own areas of interest when I’m on those sites.
I grant anyone the right to do whatever s/he wishes and with whomever (assuming consenting adults and no unwanted pain, etc., etc…). But, to me, it’s equally important to discuss areas that so directly impact on sex and sexual relationships, namely how men and women see themselves and each other. Sex is a lot more than the meeting of flesh. It’s soooo brain-based andI don’t think I can separate my passion for women’s rights and gaining the respect we deserve enough to keep my blooming mouth shut.
Thank you for the fun I’ve had here and I wish you well, Bacchus. I have (mostly) enjoyed myself. Fare well.
Phallic sex toys and male porn stars also misrepresent the reality and variety of the average male body. They are idealized larger-than-life fantasies. The problem comes for the people who can’t separate the two and expect that cartoonish perfection in their real life partners.
Ever see those ancient fertility figurines? How about those impossibly perfect, romantic sexual machines in romance novels and fanfics? There’ve always been sexual ideals that many (most) can’t meet. I’m glad we see it, recognize it, and come here and talk about it.
Now I’m going to watch the porn I downloaded last night with the huge beautiful black man with tattoos who looks nothing like my husband. My husband likes to look at BIG boobs, which I don’t have. We still love sex with each other after 18 years. It has everything to do with me showing him I accept every kinky bone in his body and me realizing he accepts me the same way.
Last thought: I have totally wanted to try the male version of that doll ever since I saw it on Realsex.
I couldn’t agree with you more about phallic sex toys, Koshka. I wonder how men feel about that? Surely, it’s got to be as disturbing to them as the caricaturism of female anatomy is to me yet I’ve never heard them discuss it. Never seen it discussed in the blogosphere, either, though I might just be in the wrong places.
And, Koshka…now you know what to ask for from your husband for Christmas, if you can wait that long. : )
I can’understandall the brouhaha raised by cheryl…
By her own admission she says “I have on only the rarest of occasions, seen a clitoris that large and pronounced” (22nd aug).
Even if it’s rare, then why can’t she accept that the doll is question might have been made keeping in mind those rare vulvas.
And, moreover, for cheryl, it seems to be a clear case of “What I haven’t seen, doesn’t exist”
How do men feel about phallic toys being larger than the average male?
FINE. It’s fantasy. Who would I be to say that no woman deserves to play with a phallus bigger than a ‘regular’ penis? That’s BS. It’s called creative license, from a design standpoint. Not to mention the many women who just love to be filled and stretched by something they might not otherwise get the chance at…
Grown-ups realize that a lover you can trust who accepts your kinks is worth way more than pursuing fantasies in real life. My man’s fantasies are really kinda tame compared to mine. I think men get a little freaked out when they find out just how wild a woman’s inner sexual life really is. It’s getting better, but we still can’t/don’t express ourselves equally when it comes to lust.
That’s it! Thank you Bacchus, figleaf, Magdalena, Phillip Clark, and all you people who put it out there. You folks have helped me understand a lot of human nature, not just sexuality. I do love a puzzle.
Just a couple notes to add. The majority of women I’ve been with have had a clitoris that extends outside of the hood. My current partner is the only one to have a clitoris that I have to uncover.
On the subject of phallic representation, I dealt with issues in that area for a long time. I am rather large both in length and width but seeing women in pornography and individuals in my life discuss, fantasize and interact with larger than life representations of myself made me self-conscious. I talked with a therapist to resolve my issues and have found a loving partner who has helped me with it as well. Still, I am drawn to pornography that depicts women who are enthralled by objects that can only be described as massive.
As a lesbian and a feminist you may at first find this sexist but I am greatly aroused by the idea of a woman enjoying my penis just short of the point of worship. After some soul searching I believe that I feel this way because of the connection I have with my penis and does not have anything to do with the domination of the opposite sex. Male masturbatory aids have been a great way for me to live out some of my fantasies in this area without having to bring my partner outside of her comfort zone.
Maybe its owner was trying to finally enjoy a woman in the elusive “Viennese oyster” position.
I suppose most “Real Dolls” aren’t capable of achieving it either….
Nice Butt crack
I know I might be a bit late, but I wanted to add some of us men do fall in love with our dolls. I’m thinking of making an A.I. (artificial intelligence) for my doll so she can move and talk on her own.
Most women seem to just want money these days, or claim all men are bad. I’m sorry if I might have offended anyone with this reply, but I do feel this way actually.
Hope you all have a great day!
-Ryan