These are from an erotic comic called The College Of Erotic Science by Ferocius:

I have heard guys scoff — in theory, as these opportunities arise rarely outside of porn and your better class of orgies — at this sort of woman-sharing. Usually they proclaim, loudly, that they’d never do such a thing because your dick would be, like, almost touching another guy’s dick. Too close for comfort, anyway; if you’d do that, you’d have to be gay.

Yes, they say this like it’s a bad thing.

Word of advice to those guys: Like Ron White says, we’re all a little bit gay anyways. Grow up, nut up, and get over it. You’re still stuck in your high school locker room, while the grownups — the Men with a capital M — are out seizing the day and eating the oysters and, yup, laughing at you.

Similar Sex Blogging:

• Cartoon Milk Drilling

A while back there a jokey “Porn For Women” book that came out, full of handsome SNAGs (Sensitive New Age Guys) doing stuff like laundry while captioned as saying “As soon as I finish the laundry, I’ll go grocery shopping. And I’ll take the kids with me, so you can relax.”

Some of it was mildly funny, but the stereotypes were so tiring that I never bothered to link.

And then I stumbled over this picture, which was, like, the same thing — only better:

Similar Sex Blogging:

• What A Cleaning Lady!
• Illustrating The Patriarchy
• The Domestic Arts
• Marital Foot Fetish

When an anime girl is having a hard time overcoming her reluctance to give a man a blowjob, there’s nothing like having a couple of her most persuasive friends on hand:

Seeing as how it’s a cartoon and all, I suppose we shouldn’t worry too much about why the man’s penis is a radically different color than his hands?

Similar Sex Blogging:

• LOLgirls Caught In The Act
• Cute Bondage Girls
• Construction Site Sex Toon
• Anime Figurine Bukkake
• The Grey Lady This Isn't

Remember Janet Jackson’s nipple?

How could you forget?

The FCC’s $550,000 fine for the half-second nippleshow made headlines back in 2004, and has had network TV busily bowdlerizing ever since. Only guess what? The fine has been overturned:

A panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that the FCC “acted arbitrarily and capriciously” in issuing the fine for the fleeting image of nudity.

…

The court said the FCC deviated from its nearly 30-year practice of fining indecent broadcast programming only when it was so “pervasive as to amount to ‘shock treatment’ for the audience.”

Satyrs and Fauns (to the extent they are distinguishable) are of course notorious for their drunken sexual frolics. Here’s an interesting drawing by Marcantoine Raimondi from the 1500s showing that, in the artistic imagination of that time, those frolics included sexual spanking:

I find ancient (no scholarly quibbles please, I’m using ancient here to mean simply “centuries old”) depictions of sexual practices interesting because so much of the modern war against sex is based on repressive notions of what “proper” sex consists of. Examples from history and art demonstrate that “modern perversions” are anything but modern, which strikes at the core of the conservative delusion that proper “old-fashioned” sex consists solely of the missionary position, between spouses, in the dark.

With regard to this specific piece, it’s interesting because in many of the older depictions of BDSM-ish activities, the erotic context is only implied. In this piece, the spanking faun’s urgent erection leaves no room for trying to explain away the sexual nature of the spanking.

Thanks to Spanking Blog for the image.

Similar Sex Blogging:

• Satyr Sex
• Spanking Nun From Two Centuries Ago
• Church Marriage Enhancement Program

Thanks to Violet Blue (who provides more context) I can link you to the Ten Commandments Of Smut, which is after being some excellent basic erotica-writing advice by M. Christian. Just one commandment for flavor:

II. Thou Shalt Not Own a Thesaurus

An exaggeration, of course (to get that vicious Roget off my case). The need to change a descriptive word after every sentence or paragraph is the clear sign of an amateur. Example: ‘cock’ in the first paragraph of the sex scene, becomes ‘rod’ in the second, ‘staff’ in the third, ‘pole’ in the forth … and you get my gist. The same goes for the silly need to be ‘polite’ in describing either a sex scene or various body parts. Unless you’re writing a Victorian homage (or pastiche), women don’t have a ‘sex’ between their legs, and a ‘member’ doesn’t live in a man’s trousers. If you can’t write ‘penis’, ‘clit’, ‘cock’, ‘cunt’, or the rest of the words you can’t say on television then find another job – or just write for television.

Wouldn’t you like to go swimming with Sophie, and maybe on a picnic with her, after?

No? Are you sure? Because she looks hungry:

From ALS Scan.