ErosBlog

The Sex Blog Of Record
 
 
January 31st, 2013 -- by Bacchus

Busty Blonde Indian Aficionado

When I first encountered this picture it made me think of my father (no longer with us). He’d have appreciated… well, there are the usual things about this picture he’d have appreciated, but in addition he’d have appreciated the advertising sign for the 1934 Indian motorcyle, just to the right of model Natally Gold’s head:

big-breasted blonde

Found here.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
January 30th, 2013 -- by Bacchus

A Gift For Your Sweetie: Double Penetration!

A while back I had a conversation somewhere on social media (I’m getting old enough for “can’t remember shit” disease to have set in, so I have no idea where or precisely with whom) with a woman who said she didn’t understand why dildo harnesses weren’t more popular with men. Being the (comedic) straight man that I am, I asked “Ah, durr, what for?” Her answer was, essentially, so they could do this:

harness for fucking her in both holes at one time

That’s the Double Penetration Harness and Dildo Set. It caught my eye because I was looking at Valentines Day sex toy sales at the time and reflecting on how “sex toys as romantic gifts” is a tricky thing to get right. It’s no fun if the buyer won’t enjoy it, but you don’t want to be that guy who springs a new and possibly-unwelcome fetish play request on his partner in the guise of buying the necessary gear “for her” with a heavy side of “so now we have to play with it”. The trick, of course, is to buy gear for a fantasy she’s already expressed an interest in.

So, this may not be your situation. But imagine that she’s said on several occasions some variation of: “Gosh, I’d love to be double-penetrated like those girls in the pornos, but I don’t want another man in my bed so I guess I’ll just have to dream about it…” I’d say the Double Penetration Harness and Dildo Set is your opportunity to go all “I am a MAN, I provide SOLUTIONS by using ENGINEERING!” Once again, MacGyver saves the day.

Hey. Maybe that’s not your situation. Maybe you’ll do better if you buy her the Anal Rosebud Suction Cylinder (I am totally not making this up). I dunno. The point is, romantic sex toy gifts work better if you’ve been listening to your partner and get a gift that enables one of their sexual fetishes or fantasies, rather than just your own. Yeah, that’s so basic, but people (especially guys) get it wrong all the time.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
January 29th, 2013 -- by Bacchus

Anti-Fascist Penis Propaganda: Foutre!

The few places this art appears on the web label it “Nazi propaganda” but the language is French and the style seems to suggest French anti-Nazi propaganda to me:

Hitler astride the giant penis artillery as it moves forward in conquest; a small naked woman stands in the way

Even if you click for the slightly-bigger version, the resolution isn’t good enough to read the smaller text except that I can make out the word “petit” at the end of the first line. Google tells me that the repeated “Foutre!” in the upper caption is a vulgar French word that can be translated a number of ways but which, etymologically anyway, basically means “Fuck!”

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
January 26th, 2013 -- by Bacchus

The Life Of The Orgy

“Those two? They get invited to all the best orgies in this town.”

popular orgy guests

Via Kinky Delight.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
January 25th, 2013 -- by Bacchus

Why Steve Writes Smut

I do not write smut. Instead, I write about smut — a subtle but very real distinction. Still, like everybody who does not write a particular thing but who sees a lot of it and fancies themselves an educated consumer of it, I flatter myself that I could write that stuff, and maybe I even might do it one day soon, who knows? (Breath: never hold it in this situation, you will turn blue. Pro tip.)

Still, I thought Steve Almond’s Why I Write Smut: A Manifesto sounded relevant to my interests. And sure enough, it’s a fast and worthy read. My personal favorite of his fifteen reasons is #7:

Because President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky did have sexual relations, and while I could care less about the big phony scandal that story became, I am interested in the sweet and deranged version of love that passed between them. Aren’t you?

On the other hand, I wish I could change Steve Almond’s mind about #13 by challenging all his wrong-headed assumptions about pornography that are buried in this densely misguided paragraph:

Because, though I watch pornography, and am terrifically involved with it for about two and a half minutes, I am most often made sad by pornography. Not simply because it involves the self-exploitation of people who probably have suffered a good deal of misfortune, and not simply because porn stars can perform in manners that often seem like physiological, geometrical, and even gravitational impossibilities (and thus make me feel like the abject sexual nebbish I surely am) but because porn stars are actors being paid, most often, to simulate pleasure. They drain sex of its single most intimate aspect: the vulnerabilities that bring us to the act in the first place, the drama of our imperfect bodies as we seek to make a communion of our desires.

But I can’t change his mind — and it would take a whole long ranty blog post just to try — so I’ll content myself with observing that accusing porn stars of “self-exploitation” is condescending and dismissive of their agency, which is not something that nice people do, even in the privacy of their own heads and sure as hell not out loud as part of an otherwise-intriguing literary manifesto.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
January 23rd, 2013 -- by Bacchus

Licking His Balls

 
January 22nd, 2013 -- by Bacchus

Classical Three-Way

Neither my Latin nor Google Translate’s is up to providing a good unambiguous translation of the caption on this classical bit of sex art:

three-way sex engraving with latin inscription

The caption reads:

Hic fedet, illa cubat: fit opus, quod proxima cernens
Artifici futuit fe bona nympha manu.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
 
cupid