ErosBlog

The Sex Blog Of Record
 
 
September 6th, 2012 -- by Bacchus

Dan Savage, Memetic Engineer

I wonder if there are genius grants for memetic engineers? Because Dan Savage deserves one. His ability to distill an important concept down into a phrase and then inject it into our collective consciousness like — no, on second thought, let’s eschew simile here — astonishes me every time I see him do it. From redefining “Santorum” years ago to blowing up twitter with #MyUnrealMarriage a few nights ago, he just never seems to stop.

Latest sighting: his “Good, Giving, and Game” mnemonic being used to explain, and even inspire, serious sexual research, as reported in Psychology Today:

GGG is a term coined by sex columnist Dan Savage to represent the qualities that he thinks makes a good sexual partner. GGG stands for ‘good, giving, and game.’ Think ‘good in bed,’ ‘giving of equal time and equal pleasure,’ and ‘game for anything–within reason.'” We know from previous research that people who are more motivated to respond to their partner’s needs (high in communal strength) report higher relationship satisfaction and feel more intrinsic joy after making a sacrifice for their partner. But, do the benefits of being ‘giving’ and ‘game’ translate to the sexual domain of a relationship as Dan Savage would suggest?

In a recent study, myself and my colleagues explored whether being motivated to meet your partner’s sexual needs is good for yourself…

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
September 4th, 2012 -- by Bacchus

Panda Panties Are Awesome

panda panties

The Nymph would totally buy/wear these panties, oh yes she would.

Via Kinky Delight.

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
September 3rd, 2012 -- by Bacchus

A Complaint For The Management

 
September 2nd, 2012 -- by Bacchus

Her Cameraman Hates Her

You really need to treat your team better, lady:

a cunt, the cameraman thinks

Update: A correspondent writes in that “it is from KOKI-TV in TUlsa, OK. BTW — Tulsa is in Tulsa County (where the “A C UNT”) in the shot comes from. See article (link below) from KOKI’s site with embedded clip. This shot appears approx. 27 seconds from the END of the clip — see http://www.fox23.com/news/local/story/Third-Rib-Crib-suspect-waives-right-to-trial/zqpxQRmDM0Ki13TZ9oON3w.cspx

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
August 31st, 2012 -- by Bacchus

The Movies In Our Minds

From Spanking Blog, on internal narratives:

Doesn’t this look like (one of) the movies that would be playing quietly in your mind if you met a taxi driver with such epic breasts and that possibly-flirtatious smile?

riding crop spanking for breasts of bbw

Or maybe that’s just me. Ooopsie!

From Red Stripe Films.

The true skill — the skill too many men don’t cultivate sufficiently — lies in letting the movies play without the images bleeding through and becoming visible on your face. (There’s a school of philosophy arguing that one shouldn’t allow the movies to play at all. But I, in my hedonism, do not hew to it.)

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
August 30th, 2012 -- by Bacchus

Swabbing It Out After Sex: Ouch

From this article about the history of the condom, some pre-condom efforts at venereal disease prevention that I hadn’t heard about before:

In 1905, in an effort to combat common infections like gonorrhea and syphilis, the Navy implemented the first trial system of chemical prophylaxis dispensed by staff doctors. Though the treatment was strictly post-intercourse, its results impressed Navy brass enough that the procedure became standard on all ships by 1909. However, one of the system’s major flaws was its dependence on self-reporting to a doctor, so the following year prophylactic kits or “pro-kits,” were distributed to soldiers for self administration. This was highly preferred to an exam, and though still painful, the pro-kits protected many recruits from being court martialed for contracting VD.

post-sex prophylactic goop

During World War I, American soldiers weren’t issued condoms; instead they were given a “Dough Boy Prophylactic Kit.” The idea behind these kits was that soldiers who “went out on a weekend furlough and had sexual contact would then clean themselves up afterwards with antiseptics and urethral syringes and so forth.” Edmonson points out that this method was like “closing the gate after the horse is out of the barn; not very effective.”

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
August 29th, 2012 -- by Bacchus

Avoidance Of “Pinkish Chemical Ooze”

Sex toy reviewing here at ErosBlog has followed a curious arc. In the early days of the blog, when traffic was bigger and sex blogs were more rare (this was before Fleshbot, mostly) I got a lot of unsolicited sex toys in the mail. I typically reviewed only the favorites, and I was always clear with folks that stuff would have to impress me a lot (code for “be expensive, nifty, and useful”) in order for me to stir my lazy ass enough to write a review.

Then sex blogging took off and got commercial. Potential places to get reviews became numerous. And sex toy sellers figured out that guaranteed reviews from smaller blogs were more valuable than potential reviews at ErosBlog that might or might not happen. The no-strings-attached stuff in the mail trickled off, but the offers with strings exploded. I don’t play those games; I’m not going to promise a review, return your toys after review (yuck), promise your preferred anchor text in my review links, none of it. Mostly I ignore those emails as spam; sometimes, if the offer is about a toy I’d actually like to see, I’ll respond with my “send it if you want, no promises” disclaimer. Sometimes this leads to amusing exchanges with huffy and offended sex toy purveyors who think I should be drooling to get free toys; less often, it leads to stuff in the mail. A surprising number of times it results in promises to send stuff that never arrives; apparently, too many sex toy companies have drop shippers that can’t handle shipping to post office boxes or discrete packaging and labeling. What with one thing and another, it’s been years since ErosBlog got stuff in the mail that was nifty enough to try out and quality enough to actually review. That’s just how it goes.

However, reviewers for more prominent outlets apparently got (still get?) a lot more, and more amazing, stuff. Here’s Gram Ponante:

I would review sex toys, often securing the assistance of willing female friends to give their honest impressions of non-organic objects I would scientifically insert into their bodies.

“Don’t worry, Baby,” I would say. “It’s for a blog.”

Each month I’d get boxes and boxes of dildos and vibrators — some of them heavy and elegant pieces of practical art — that would disappear into the purses and vaginas of various friends. And that’s great because I didn’t need them back.

But then came the male-oriented sex toys: the masturbation sleeves, the disembodied molded vaginas and anuses of people like Carmen Luvana, Joanna Angel, Jada Fire, and others, made of phthalate-rich rubbery material with names like “Cyberskin” and “TrueFlesh.” It was very difficult to give this stuff away. When April Flores’ “Realistic Pussy & Ass” arrived, we had great fun just slapping it around the office; it did feel like the ass of a delighted BBW vixen, but I couldn’t find anyone to fuck it, ditto the rubberized moneymakers of any of the other porn stars.

What’s more, when I would place April Flores’ Realistic Pussy & Ass on a co-worker’s chair as a joke, I was mortified to find it left residue. Were April Flores herself to sit her naked pussy and ass on an office chair, the next tenant would only sense that something wonderful had happened there, not be unnerved by some pinkish chemical ooze.

Just so, just so. That chair, you could probably sell on eBay. Meanwhile, I’m pleased to report nobody ever tried to mail me any disembodied phthalate-oozing pussies or asses.

The rest of Gram’s article is worth reading for his take on male-oriented sex toys (mostly not worth the added complexity “unless the toy is for a part of your person you just can’t get at, like the prostate”) and for good lines like this: “The lapsed Catholic in me was fine with spilling my seed non-procreatively, but not on the ground; it had to be on a living face.”

Similar Sex Blogging:

 
 
cupid